Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Overreacting or the right thing to do.

245

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,389 ✭✭✭NachoBusiness


    OP, it's cases like this one yesterday where a cop was cleared for shooting a kid that was carrying a BB gun that you should focus on.

    There were even witnesses saying cops lied.

    Cops had little or no choice here though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,499 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    ok i missed the flash of yellow on the taser. Did she actually fire it though? she dropped it in less than a second.

    Think she fired it, but it's marginal. Of course some on here will try to tell you she tasered him to within an inch of his life and then shot him in the head at point-blank range


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,904 ✭✭✭daheff


    There is also the real possibility that the guy they know pulled a gun could still try to shoot at them from the ground. I doubt they are trained to take that chance.
    and a chance (albeit small) that he is still capable of firing back.

    there are only 8 seconds between the gun appearing and the last shot being fired.
    Not much of a chance after being tased and shot 8 times (i make it 8 shots by sgt & then a further 3-4 by officer when he hits the ground)
    fullstop wrote: »
    The female officer uses a (yellow) taser first, while the male officer goes straight for his gun.

    the video from the sgt gives a better view of what happened. I think the female officer only started shooting after the sgt did it. Otherwise I think she was using the taser.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭Raging_Ninja


    ok i missed the flash of yellow on the taser. Did she actually fire it though? she dropped it in less than a second.

    She fired it, the guy turned and stumbled and fell, dunno if caused by taser or other officers gunfire.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 4,664 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hyzepher


    The front officer moves cutlery out of the way on a table before the guy passes - good instincts but if he is thinking this then surely they frisk him in the toilet


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭Caliden


    Didn't read any story before watching the video and honestly thought I was going to see a cop get shot/stabbed.

    If it looks like a gun and it's pulled out in a situation like that, how else were they supposed to react?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭Chemical Byrne


    Another interesting experiment showing the difference in police response to open carrying between black and white people.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,402 ✭✭✭nxbyveromdwjpg



    Officer Griffins' after-the-fact shots seem to be a case of contagious shooting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,882 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    She didn't shoot the taser, watch the video a couple of times at 0.25 speed you can see. (The flash of light when she pulls the taser out is the strobing light on the police mans gun / the laser dot he has)

    The man pulled the bb gun, the police man pushes him away while drawing his gun, the female officer draws her taser, the police man is already shooting, she changes to her pistol and shoots him 3 times, the first two times the man is still holding the gun, it's only between the second and third shot that the man rolls over and has released the gun


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,893 ✭✭✭Canis Lupus


    over reaction as per. wouldn't expect anything less from murika and the low standards they have for their police

    And captain 'predictable response' has arrived. This is such a cut and dry case of justified shooting and yet you still can't be happy. It's such a shame the guy wasn't black so you could harp on about that as well :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭KungPao


    Surely if he's a suspect for a crime (and you can never be too careful particularly in a country where every man and his dog have guns) he should have been handcuffed and searched in the bathroom?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    KungPao wrote: »
    Surely if he's a suspect for a crime (and you can never be too careful particularly in a country where every man and his dog have guns) he should have been handcuffed and searched in the bathroom?

    perhaps they didnt want to do it in confined space full of hard surfaces in case he kicks off?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,499 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    And captain 'predictable response' has arrived. This is such a cut and dry case of justified shooting and yet you still can't be happy. It's such a shame the guy wasn't black so you could harp on about that as well :rolleyes:

    He's just taking a break from defending the Egyptian lad


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    osarusan wrote: »
    I'd wonder why he wasn't searched/frisked as soon as possible, but maybe there are good reasons for bringing him outside first, I don't know (get him away from as many people as possible?).
    He was only suspected, they were bringing him outside the restaurant for questioning and a formal arrest, which I'm sure the owners would have prefered. Don't see anything untowards there.
    over reaction as per. wouldn't expect anything less from murika and the low standards they have for their police
    How would you react if someone pointed a gun at you?
    daheff wrote: »
    whatever about him taking out the gun and the officer shooting initially, the part where she fires mutiple shots at somebody on the ground is (to pardon the phrase) overkill.
    People don't die instantly when shot. At any time before he got a fatal shot he could have fired back. You often hear stories of people not even realising they've been shot until they feel the wet of the blood pumping out of them a few minutes later.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Has a post just disappeared from this thread? it was there a second ago?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,862 ✭✭✭✭inforfun


    Kev W wrote: »
    Then you don't get to complain that nobody else did.

    It wasnt a complaint.
    It was an observation and a question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,072 ✭✭✭OU812


    I've watched this a couple of times now. The "victim" raises the gun twice, the first time as he takes it out of his pocket (52 seconds) and goes to hold it in an assault stance (ready to fire). He's then tossed out of the way by the sergeant and as he spins, the gun comes up again (56 seconds). This looks like a totally justified shooting to me.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,847 ✭✭✭Julez


    I've seen some ridiculous videos of american police and this is not one of them. Think if that was your mother/father/wife/son whatever behind the badge, you wouldn't want them taking any chances. If you pull a gun on an armed cop you're getting shot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    ScumLord wrote: »
    He was only suspected, they were bringing him outside the restaurant for questioning and a formal arrest, which I'm sure the owners would have prefered. Don't see anything untowards there.

    Especially as the guy appeared to be quite willing to go with them. There was nothing to suggest that he was going to do anything untoward.


  • Registered Users Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Sierra 117


    It was definitely the right thing to do. The man pulled out a gun. Real gun or no, you don't do that. The police were completely justified in shooting him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    The smart thing for that guy to do was realise he's caught and tell the officers he has the gun on the way out. What exactly did he expect to happen when he pulled his toy gun out?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    'Hey, everybody! Look! We shoot white people, too!'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,866 ✭✭✭hynesie08


    Has anyone trotted out the "why didn't they shoot him in the leg/shoot the gun out of his hand" line yet?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    Has anyone trotted out the "why didn't they shoot him in the leg/shoot the gun out of his hand" line yet?

    surprisingly they havent. Shouldnt be too long now though.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭Chemical Byrne


    3
    2
    1
    .
    He didn't deserve to die for having a bb gun. They could have just shot him leg or shot the gun out of his hand if the were acting purely in self defence. Why didn't the do that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    3
    2
    1
    .
    He didn't deserve to die for having a bb gun. They could have just shot him leg or shot the gun out of his hand if the were acting purely in self defence. Why didn't the do that?

    Also, surely the would have seen that imitation is inscribed on the barrel of the gun in 2mm high type when he whipped out the gun. Total amateurs…


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,495 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    3
    2
    1
    .
    He didn't deserve to die for having a bb gun. They could have just shot him leg or shot the gun out of his hand if the were acting purely in self defence. Why didn't the do that?

    Also, couldn't they see that he wasn't black?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Also, couldn't they see that he wasn't black?

    Total amateurs…


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    inforfun wrote: »
    3 days ago a guy in The Hague dies while being arrested in The Netherlands, rioting going on for days now.
    Not a peep on boards (or Irish media for that matter).

    Idiot thief pulls (fake) gun in The USA and faces the consequences and here we are, another thread to have a go at The USA.
    What is the obsession with The USA?

    (dont come out with: Well, open your own thread about The Hague. I will not.)

    I suspect the answer is that in The Hague, this is almost unheard of, and not neccessarily symptomatic of a wider issue. Whereas in the US, stories like these seem to be every second day, and it alarms people because it shows up a huge culture gap that tends to be rendered otherwise invisible by the prevalence of American TV/culture and the shared language.

    As fair or unfair as it is, we "expect" things like this to go on only far away, and the more different the culture to our own, the more likely we are to accept it as a "them" issue. With the US, we are very prone to seeing the country as more or less like us, just on a bigger scale. We probably get almost as much news from the US as we do from the UK or Ireland depending on how you get your news from day to day. When something like this happens, and it happens far too much lately, we are far more inclined to notice it than somewhere like Mexico or even the Netherlands.


  • Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,750 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    I wouldn't even draw a picture of a gun around US police.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭Buona Fortuna


    kjl wrote: »
    I think the guy is a bit of an idiot, but did he deserve to die? I don't think so.

    The guy is a sad loss to the gene pool.

    Did he deserve to die - of course not, but then who does?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,127 ✭✭✭kjl


    OK I am willing to admit that I could be wrong on this.

    I don't think the guy deserved to die and maybe the real reason I am upset here is because this entire incident happened because American citizens have easy access to handguns. If this happened in Ireland it would have had a different outcome, even if our police were armed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    'Murica
    #Freedom
    #Gunssavelives

    What would the Garda ERU do if you pulled a gun on them? Why dont you try it and see?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,507 ✭✭✭Buona Fortuna


    kjl wrote: »
    OK I am willing to admit that I could be wrong on this.
    I don't think the guy deserved to die and maybe the real reason I am upset here is because this entire incident happened because American citizens have easy access to handguns. If this happened in Ireland it would have had a different outcome, even if our police were armed.

    Not so sure on the last bit tbh.

    Would he have a few less holes in him? I'm sure he would, but I'm pretty sure he'd be just as dead.

    Pull what looks like a gun on armed police and in the dark, its going to end badly for you, no matter the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    kjl wrote: »
    OK I am willing to admit that I could be wrong on this.

    I don't think the guy deserved to die and maybe the real reason I am upset here is because this entire incident happened because American citizens have easy access to handguns. If this happened in Ireland it would have had a different outcome, even if our police were armed.

    the entire incident happened because the guy is an idiot with a deathwish.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    3
    2
    1
    .
    He didn't deserve to die for having a bb gun. They could have just shot him leg or shot the gun out of his hand if the were acting purely in self defence. Why didn't the do that?
    They obviously don't get much round house kick training these days either. Back in the eighties any cop would have used a roundhouse kick to bring a quick and peaceful end to the situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭Raging_Ninja


    kjl wrote: »
    If this happened in Ireland it would have had a different outcome, even if our police were armed.

    Few years ago there was a post office robbery foiled by armed gardai. One raider pointed a (real) gun at the guards and was killed, as was the raider beside him.

    http://m.independent.ie/irish-news/force-used-by-armed-garda-in-foiled-post-office-robbery-proportionate-26783677.html

    Not so different.


  • Registered Users Posts: 643 ✭✭✭scdublin


    Why don't they use taser guns?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    scdublin wrote: »
    Why don't they use taser guns?


    ROFL. Somebody points a gun and you think they should pull out tasers?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,247 ✭✭✭✭Guy:Incognito


    Maybe we should give our soldiers tasers too.:)


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    kjl wrote: »
    Warning content is a little disturbing.
    Yes it's a person being shot until he is dead.

    I don't blame the officers for reacting in this way, but I find this thread interesting because nobody seems to be perturbed at watching a man shot dead.

    Maybe I'm too prudish about such things, or maybe I don't play enough video games, but I couldn't watch someone do that to a dog.

    I fully understand why the police discharged their guns, but it's the humdrum online reaction to seeing a man die in this way that I find most unpleasant of all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Yes it's a person being shot until he is dead.

    I don't blame the officers for reacting in this way, but I find this thread interesting because nobody seems to be perturbed at watching a man shot dead.

    Maybe I'm too prudish about such things, or maybe I don't play enough video games, but I couldn't watch someone do that to a dog.

    I fully understand why the police discharged their guns, but it's the humdrum online reaction to seeing a man die in this way that I find most unpleasant of all.

    well you dont actually see anything do you? no gunshot wounds, no blood, no closeups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,792 ✭✭✭2Mad2BeMad


    well you dont actually see anything do you? no gunshot wounds, no blood, no closeups.

    i saw blood from the wound?
    poor fecker got shot so many times theirs more holes in him then their is "him" left

    idiot to be honest
    real or fake gun, it looked real

    although I don't get why they needed to shoot him nearly 10 times, 2 shots would of been enough to get him on the ground, and possible could of saved his life but they continued to shoot even as he stumbled to the ground, i think maybe 1 more shot while his back was facing them on the ground

    either way

    america is ****ed up in its way of policing but I've heard of such mad crimes over their I can see why their like that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    i think it is interesting that because we have video of what happened the response has been (mostly) reasonable and agrees that the police were justified. I wonder what the response would be if we did not have video. Considerably more condemnation of the police i would imagine. The sooner they all start wearing bodycams the better.


  • Posts: 13,712 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    well you dont actually see anything do you? no gunshot wounds, no blood, no closeups.
    It's not gore, or lack of it, that I reacted to. I just find it disquieting to unexpectedly see a person shot, fall over, and their life evaporate.

    I've no doubt most people consider such a reaction a bit precious; until now, I didn't think it was unusual to react to a fatal shooting of a human in that way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    It's not gore, or lack of it, that I reacted to. I just find it disquieting to unexpectedly see a person shot, fall over, and their life evaporate.
    What else was a video about American cops going to be about? You should have been expecting a shooting really.


  • Registered Users Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Sierra 117


    2Mad2BeMad wrote: »
    although I don't get why they needed to shoot him nearly 10 times, 2 shots would of been enough to get him on the ground, and possible could of saved his life but they continued to shoot even as he stumbled to the ground, i think maybe 1 more shot while his back was facing them on the ground

    Because those two shots you fire might miss. And even if they don't, two shots aren't guaranteed to put someone down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,882 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    I'm sure some james bond type would have been able to shoot the gun directly out of his hand, but in the real world it's bang bang bang bang bang bang bang until the person trying to kill you is no longer a threat. He was holding the gun until the second to last shot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,789 ✭✭✭✭ScumLord


    I'm sure some james bond type would have been able to shoot the gun directly out of his hand,
    Depends on which James Bond shows up. 1960s Bond would have shot the gun out of his hand and spanked a woman's arse. Modern James bond would shot the guy in the head and get airlifted out by a woman flying a helicopter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭Aimead


    Looks justified to me, but I do have one concern though. When they were leading the man through the restaurant one of the cops has an exchange that goes something like this: “You want to know what page we’re on? Get outside! That’s what page we’re on.

    I might have gotten that slightly wrong, and I really don’t intend to re-watch what is, essentially, a snuff video to correct it. Does anyone else find that sort of comment and tone extremely unhelpful in a situation like this? That sort of approach will only lead to escalating the situation rather than de-escalating it.

    I have noticed that there is a world of difference between US cops and the Gardai in terms of attitude. In my experience the actions and behaviours of the Gardai serve to calm the situation, where by contrast US cops tend to inflame situations for no justifiable reason (I’ve had “go back home to Ireland” yelled at me).

    While it could never be argued that the above exchanged caused the shooting to happen, it is something that stood out for me. All that said, in the moment where the ‘gun’ was pulled out the cops were fully justified.
    I wonder what the response would be if we did not have video. Considerably more condemnation of the police i would imagine. The sooner they all start wearing bodycams the better.
    Given some of the videos I have seen I would like to reverse this a little, and ask how many killings were recorded as justified without video?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement