Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Gender issues in After Hours - Your feedback requested.

1…34689…17

Comments

  • #252
    mackg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭mackg


    K-9 wrote: »
    Completely agreed, if you dish it it, be prepared to take it back! I do post in socer and GAA ;) Hugely important in AH as well.





    Ach, I'm a bit lost now, I just don't tend to read between lines anymore.

    Put is this way, mods have to go on examples. WE all know of sexist posts against women.

    A few examples of posts agains men would be very helpful.

    I don't have any problem with posts like this but given what has been said in the thread already I imagine this is what he is talking about

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=80043127&postcount=5489


  • #253
    WindSock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Millicent wrote: »
    Cody, I just read your previous post. Are you serious in thinking this is all part of some feminist conspiracy? :confused:

    I would say its obviously a topic this poster is passionate about. But to constantly re reg to make long rambling flaming posts is more of an obsession. A slightly scarey one imo.
    If he just kept to the topic without the pure malice toward everyone who doesnt agree with him, it might have made an interesting debate.
    This poster also seems concerned with who and how many people thank posts. Perhaps he is 'trying' to achieve some legendary status on boards himself. I daresay this reregging thing may go on for sometime...


  • #254
    WindSock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    Reregging to get around bans to constantly repeat yourself is what I am posting about. I don't give a hoot about new or other rereggers. Or their gender. And to say it appears to be an obsession is not a personal attack, its an observation based on behaviour.


  • #255
    WindSock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    I dunno, we feminaz...feminist....clowder of cats like to keep you men on your feet.

    And it's Ms. WindSock.


  • #256
    4zn76tysfajdxp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 27,944 ✭✭✭✭4zn76tysfajdxp


    Cody, I'm not go into a back and forth with you about this since all of your posts are hundreds of words long and... ugh. No thanks. But I am glad you used the Eliminati name in reference to this mythical hooded cartel of women who run After Hours behind the scenes. I hope it sticks.


  • #257
    Beruthiel
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 42,362 Mod ✭✭✭✭Beruthiel


    LLCoolJ - clearly a rereg.
    Sitebanned.


  • #258
    Wibbs
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Millicent wrote: »
    Questioning the parentage of somebody's baby? How is that not offensive? Or implying that she's sleeping with the boss? Why would that even count as humour?
    Ok but...
    mackg wrote: »
    I don't have any problem with posts like this but given what has been said in the thread already I imagine this is what he is talking about

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=80043127&postcount=5489
    You thanked this post M. Would you thank a similar one aimed at women? I dunno... Don't get me wrong M if I'd seen that post I'd have likely thanked it too. My personal take is that there are too many first world problems bedwetters out there of both genders who need to grow a pair of testes/ovaries[delete as applicable]. Would I post/thank that in PI? Nope, but I would in AH, or at least not freak out if I saw it there. Horses for courses.
    Boombastic wrote: »
    If the above quote by me is sexist, I think that the level of modding some posters want in after hours would be over bearing and really stifle the lightheartness and discussion on the forum threads.
    I agree B, though I would underline "some" posters. As Frada pointed out earlier in the thread you have a two way race between "feminist liberal conspiracy" versus "I'm a sensitive soul/AH adds to the rape culture". Both hyped up nonsense IMHO. The middle ground is where it's at, it's where I'd bet the farm the vast majority of the posters, mods and admins think it's at too. That middle ground needs tweaking and the extreme views here are merely a distraction.
    LLCoolJ wrote:
    Saying someone is obsessed, in the neagitive way you did, is of course a personal attack. You could have said I was determined, persistent, steadfast, assiduous, hawt, unflagging, resolute, tireless .. even stubborn I would have settled for, but "obsessed" - makes me feel mocked and now I'm beginning to think you don't like me all that much.
    Good god man, change the bloody record. Obsession and daftness pretty much sums it up. Beating the same dead horse, regregging to do so, thereby increasingly threatening your ability to actually post in the forum you seem so intent in defending is obsessional and yep, daft.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • #259
    dr.bollocko
    Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Another feedback thread successfully ruined by an agenda poster.

    Oh well.

    We shall persevere.


  • #260
    Gummy Panda
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,919 ✭✭✭✭Gummy Panda


    Millicent wrote: »
    .

    As has been said many times already, those aren't the posts that are problematic, it's the "get your tits out", "spread your legs", the doubting of rape victims, the malicious posts that are problematic.

    In fairness, if I post that its not gender specific :pac:


  • #261
    Wibbs
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    dr.bollocko wrote: »
    Another feedback thread successfully temporarily ruined made silly by an agenda poster.
    FYP. :D

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Advertisement
  • #262
    sheesh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭sheesh


    filtering through all that stuff

    Are we saying that there should be no sexism in after hours?


  • #263
    4zn76tysfajdxp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 27,944 ✭✭✭✭4zn76tysfajdxp


    sheesh wrote: »
    filtering through all that stuff

    Are we saying that there should be no sexism in after hours?

    In short, yes.


  • #264
    sheesh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭sheesh


    Noah Incalculable Barometer wrote: »
    In short, yes.

    Fair enough.

    Is there a working description of what is a sexist post?


  • #265
    Scioch
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,249 ✭✭✭Scioch


    Why not make a point of highlighting it for a while ?. Sticky in AH saying sexism is the work of the devil and will result in a ban. Ask people to report what they believe to be sexism and see what kind of stuff people are deciding is uncalled for.

    Once you know what people are reporting, what people are posting and how everyone is dealing with it as a forum you will be in a better position to know where to draw the line. Talking about what can be done and what should be done only gets you so far. There is measures in place already to deal with sexism, just tighten them up a bit and see how it goes.


  • #266
    seamus
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    sheesh wrote: »
    Fair enough.

    Is there a working description of what is a sexist post?
    Think about what constitutes a racist post. Then change the subject to a woman (or indeed, a man).

    Presto.


  • #267
    Tombi!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,689 ✭✭✭Tombi!


    sheesh wrote: »
    Fair enough.

    Is there a working description of what is a sexist post?

    We're not sure, yet. Basically so far we've decided the generalizations aren't allowed.

    Other than that, I guess smart comments akin to "yore ma" and so on but about gender are going too.

    Now we're just trying to find the line from what is banter and what is sexism.


  • #268
    Boombastic
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭Boombastic


    This thread got me thinking about another thread in AH


    This post in this thread



    '.............Yet again, the entire onus is being put on the woman which is unfair. If a man wants to prevent himself becoming a father then he also needs to be as informed as the woman.........'


    A poster being offended as they think what is being I am saying in the thread is all responsibility for contraception should be the womans' responsibility. When in fact a few posts above that, I stated
    Oh I definitely agree both partners are as responsible as each other, which raises the question (in general), if the pill is failing so often, why aren't the males also wearing condoms aswell as the girl being on the pill?


    I think there are a lot of cases in after hours where people don't actually read posts and just jump in with the 'offended' line.


    Edit: just to add it's even in this thread
    you are not offended because it doesn't apply to your gender
    , when it actually does


  • #269
    Millicent
    Registered Users Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Ok but...

    You thanked this post M. Would you thank a similar one aimed at women? I dunno... Don't get me wrong M if I'd seen that post I'd have likely thanked it too. My personal take is that there are too many first world problems bedwetters out there of both genders who need to grow a pair of testes/ovaries[delete as applicable]. Would I post/thank that in PI? Nope, but I would in AH, or at least not freak out if I saw it there. Horses for courses.

    You know what -- I probably shouldn't have thanked that. If it was something that caused somebody offence and I had done it, I wouldn't bother trying to defend it, I'd simply say I was sorry and stop posting or thanking anything like that. If the consensus is that that sort of posting is not on, I'll go with that.


  • #270
    Millicent
    Registered Users Posts: 4,559 ✭✭✭Millicent


    Boombastic wrote: »
    This thread got me thinking about another thread in AH


    This post in this thread







    A poster being offended as they think what is being I am saying in the thread is all responsibility for contraception should be the womans' responsibility. When in fact a few posts above that, I stated




    I think there are a lot of cases in after hours where people don't actually read posts and just jump in with the 'offended' line.


    Edit: just to add it's even in this thread , when it actually does

    So you're taking a digging at me, even though I apologised?


  • Advertisement
  • #271
    tigger123
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,521 ✭✭✭tigger123


    I'll completely avoid any threads relating to gender issues in AH. They very quickly descend into nonsense, trolling and people behaving like complete dicks. There was a thread on rape within the last 12 months and I kind of lost a lot of respect for both boards.ie and it's moderators due to the type of stuff which was being tolerated on the thread (I haven't got time to find it right now). I look at the boards.ie and After Hours section much differently now.

    The argument is often made that if you don't like what's being said then don't come here (to After Hours), so I don't really bother with it a whole lot any more.

    And also, as another user pointed out, if you said some of the things said about women about another race or ethnic group you'd be banned, receive warnings or whatever. But apparently saying those things about women is acceptable according to boards.ie and it's moderators. I cannot for the life of me get my head around how this works.


  • #272
    Boombastic
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭Boombastic


    Millicent wrote: »
    So you're taking a digging at me, even though I apologised?

    No I'm not having a dig at you. I'm just using it as an example. I see it a lot in AH. The other example I gave was from a different poster.


  • #273
    El Guapo!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,438 ✭✭✭✭El Guapo!


    I don't think there's any need to get into the nitty gritty of what constitutes a sexist remark/post/thread.
    Surely it should be at the mods discretion?
    Could the charter not be updated with a strict warning that sexism aimed at either gender will not be tolerated and that way everyone is given fair warning and must use their own cop on not to post anything which may be construed as sexist.
    If a mod sees a post that they feel is overly sexist/offensive then they swoop in and give a short ban from AH. (maybe a couple of days?) And the poster could of course appeal it if they wish. And maybe bring in a 3 strikes rule? If a poster gets 3 short bans for sexist/offensive remarks they get forum banned for 6 months or 12 months or whatever the admins feel is appropriate. That would weed out the regular offenders.


  • #274
    Wibbs
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Millicent wrote: »
    You know what -- I probably shouldn't have thanked that. If it was something that caused somebody offence and I had done it, I wouldn't bother trying to defend it, I'd simply say I was sorry and stop posting or thanking anything like that. If the consensus is that that sort of posting is not on, I'll go with that.
    Jesus I wouldn't. Take stuff like that out of AH and turn it into fry shíte central*. I say have the courage of your convictions. You liked/agreed with the content of the post and you agreed with it.






    *That's probably just me though. I generally don't like inoffensive people. I don't mean I like dickheads, but give me an interesting firebrand over some beige inoffensive type any day.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • #275
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 50,630 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Wibbs wrote: »
    The middle ground is where it's at, it's where I'd bet the farm the vast majority of the posters, mods and admins think it's at too. That middle ground needs tweaking and the extreme views here are merely a distraction.

    This sums it up really.

    I'm going to be completely honest here and say I that I am genuinely concerned that the fun is going to be taken completely out of AH. I really am. I have found myself, since the beginning of this thread, afraid to post the way I normally do. I understand things need to be addressed, there are some things, as per my previous post, that I'm unhappy with too. I just really really hope that it doesn't cross the line to the point where people are afraid of having banter for fear of being banned. offending someone.


  • #276
    mackg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭mackg


    tigger123 wrote: »
    I'll completely avoid any threads relating to gender issues in AH. They very quickly descend into nonsense, trolling and people behaving like complete dicks. There was a thread on rape within the last 12 months and I kind of lost a lot of respect for both boards.ie and it's moderators due to the type of stuff which was being tolerated on the thread (I haven't got time to find it right now). I look at the boards.ie and After Hours section much differently now.

    The argument is often made that if you don't like what's being said then don't come here (to After Hours), so I don't really bother with it a whole lot any more.

    And also, as another user pointed out, if you said some of the things said about women about another race or ethnic group you'd be banned, receive warnings or whatever. But apparently saying those things about women is acceptable according to boards.ie and it's moderators. I cannot for the life of me get my head around how this works.

    Did you PM one of the mods to ask why all the posts you reported weren't actioned?

    EDIT: Is this the way feedback threads usually go?


  • Advertisement
  • #277
    Yitzhak Rabin
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    Lad, give it a rest. You're seriously coming across as a complete nutbag with all the re-regging.

    Edit: Nevermind, post was deleted.


  • #278
    oscarBravo
    Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 28,820 Mod ✭✭✭✭oscarBravo


    yekahS wrote: »
    Lad, give it a rest. You're seriously coming across as a complete nutbag with all the re-regging.
    Just ignore him. His posts will just be deleted, which leaves you looking like you're talking to yourself. :)


  • #279
    Yitzhak Rabin
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,225 ✭✭✭Yitzhak Rabin


    oscarBravo wrote: »
    Just ignore him. His posts will just be deleted, which leaves you looking like you're talking to yourself. :)

    Dammit, now I look like a nutbag.


  • #280
    Boombastic
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭Boombastic


    yekahS wrote: »
    Dammit, now I look like a nutbag.

    Is the word 'nutbag' sexist towards men? I can't decide.


  • #281
    tigger123
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,521 ✭✭✭tigger123


    mackg wrote: »
    Did you PM one of the mods to ask why all the posts you reported weren't actioned?

    EDIT: Is this the way feedback threads usually go?

    I reported two posts and nothing was done, and I received no response either. The reporting process didn't tell me who was supposed to be moderating that thread ... so not sure how I would have followed it up with an e-mail?


  • Advertisement
  • #282
    mackg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,938 ✭✭✭mackg


    tigger123 wrote: »
    I reported two posts and nothing was done, and I received no response either. The reporting process didn't tell me who was supposed to be moderating that thread ... so not sure how I would have followed it up with an e-mail?

    Use the boards private message function. PM any one of the moderators of the forum listed at the bottom right of the main page of the forum. You don't normally receive responses for reported posts.


  • #283
    Micky Dolenz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    Deleted User wrote: »
    This sums it up really.

    I'm going to be completely honest here and say I that I am genuinely concerned that the fun is going to be taken completely out of AH. I really am. I have found myself, since the beginning of this thread, afraid to post the way I normally do. I understand things need to be addressed, there are some things, as per my previous post, that I'm unhappy with too. I just really really hope that it doesn't cross the line to the point where people are afraid of having banter for fear of being banned.


    This won't happen. The change will be subtle and not done over night. In fact its been changing all along. Recently I was reading a 4 year old AH thread on this subject. it's a world apart from where we are now, for the better.

    This is another step on the road to improvement but by no means the final one. We very well will be back here in 6 months but things will be better and itll roll on.

    There won't be ban sprees, it'll be steady as it goes.


  • #284
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 50,630 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    There won't be ban sprees, it'll be steady as it goes.

    Sorry Micky, I didn't mean to imply there would be. I have a lot of respect for the AH mods and have always found them to be fair and, for the mostpart, consistent. It's just down to, as Wibbs put it, finding the right balance.


  • #285
    Micky Dolenz
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,080 ✭✭✭✭Micky Dolenz


    It's a whole lot of grey. The black and white stuff is easy. That's why we are here.

    This is never going to be about mods or admin trying to change a forum, it's about a whole community shifting together. Heh.


  • #286
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 50,630 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    This is never going to be about mods or admin trying to change a forum,

    I'm not sure if that was in reply to my post, but if so, I never for a second implied that it was. Of course it's not, and I don't believe that anyone (maybe with one exception) thinks that's the case. Anyone with a ounce of cop on realises that this whole thread is about the good of the forum, and ultimately boards.ie.


  • #287
    Elmidena
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,570 ✭✭✭Elmidena


    mackg wrote: »
    Quote: Originally Posted by Tigger viewpost.gif
    so she's defo riding then

    good to know

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by davet82 viewpost.gif
    thats what you get for breeding...
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Boombastic
    Is her boss the father of the child

    Stealing these nicely laid out quotes from earlier to give my 2c.

    Tigger.... tongue-in-cheek. Absolutely harmless. If there's any offense whatsoever to be had here, it's at Tigger's expense, painting themselves as desperate or obsessive or excessively randy.... and that's REALLY stopping to think about it. A comment like that doesn't deserve in-depth analyses.

    Davet82: Very unhelpful, and if they were going for humour, very unfunny. I would describe this as trolling myself, or trying so hard it's painfully obvious. Whilst I agree if the OP wanted a serious discussion she should have gone elsewhere, even her citizen's advice office, I do think this is running in, throwing a mudpie, running out and waiting with a grin on your face for anyone throwing a thanks your way. Not a personal attack on my part, that's just what I got from reading it.

    Boombastic: Really? People call this offensive? I despair, I really, really do. It's a joking response but not altogether out of the realms of possibility. The OP can easily respond "none of your business" if they did somehow get offended, but to be quite honest I read it as a funny retort and nothing else. If people want seriousness they can look elsewhere, but if you're digging up holes in posts like this just to have a problem, then there can't really be a problem to begin with. Not worthy of a card at all imo, and hence not worthy of being used as an example.


  • #288
    Alaric Large Earth
    Posts: 0 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Alaric Large Earth


    I like the way the mods are dealing with these posts lately
    it's more visible but we're all still having fun
    good work


  • #289
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 50,630 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    bluewolf wrote: »
    I like the way the mods are dealing with these posts lately
    it's more visible but we're all still having fun
    good work

    Ditto.

    On reflection of my earlier post, I shouldn't have used the words "for fear of being banned" I really meant, for fear of offending someone. I suppose that can be looked at as a good thing to some degree, that I'm considering other posters before I reply. However, yesterday I posted in the olympic thread about Usain Bolt being out til 4 am with three of the swedish handball team. I was about to post "legend" and then in my head I had all the thoughts of the "men are legends, women are slags" thing running through my head, so I changed it. There was another post that I completely changed my mind about and didn't post at all. They're most likely my own problem though and no real need to have altered my posts at all. I have a real issue with offending people though, I hate the thoughts of offending anyone, but I also hate that non offensive things can be taken as such.

    Meh, I don't know, I'm just throwing thoughts down at this stage. Probably best if I back out now :)


  • #290
    Tombi!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,689 ✭✭✭Tombi!


    bluewolf wrote: »
    I like the way the mods are dealing with these posts lately
    it's more visible but we're all still having fun
    good work

    Explain? I have no clue what you're talking about but am interested. :o


  • #291
    Alaric Large Earth
    Posts: 0 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Alaric Large Earth


    Brutal Deluxe wrote: »
    Explain? I have no clue what you're talking about but am interested. :o

    the sexist posts in AH
    they're getting pulled up on them more visibly


  • Advertisement
  • #292
    Tombi!
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,689 ✭✭✭Tombi!


    bluewolf wrote: »
    the sexist posts in AH
    they're getting pulled up on them more visibly

    Ooh that, I noticed that myself. Thanks.


  • #293
    WindSock
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,239 ✭✭✭✭WindSock


    yekahS wrote: »
    Dammit, now I look like a nutbag.

    Same :(


    http://garfieldminusgarfield.net/


  • #294
    hatrickpatrick
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    dr.bollocko wrote: »
    Another feedback thread successfully ruined by an agenda poster.

    Oh well.

    We shall persevere.

    I have to say, you know I have my fair share of beefs with the mods of Boards.ie but I have to applaud you in, as you say, persevering.
    I'd have washed my hands of this long ago if I was in your shoes. ;)


  • #295
    hatrickpatrick
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,797 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    It's a whole lot of grey.

    Fifty shades of it, in fact?
    *runs away*


  • #296
    Jesus Shaves
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,959 ✭✭✭Jesus Shaves


    Stop the Culchie bashing threads too, they deeply offend me
    Also ban dole bashing threads, the abuse some people get on them is unreal

    Anyway, if the people of after hours are going to go around getting offended by every little thing that's posted then they shouldn't be in after hours, after hours is after hours and trying to ban people saying things will just ruin the whole "after hours" idea.
    But someone probably said that already

    EDIT: I see it's already been decided, I'm always late to the fuppin party


  • #297
    sheesh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,081 ✭✭✭sheesh


    Can i offer a scenario:

    A person makes a comment about women

    Someone else reports the post as sexist,

    the op says it was not and that they are a woman.


  • #298
    Fr_Dougal
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,166 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    Micky Dolenz wrote: »
    This won't happen.

    It already has IMHO.


  • #299
    Morag
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,427 ✭✭✭Morag


    sheesh wrote: »
    Can i offer a scenario:

    A person makes a comment about women

    Someone else reports the post as sexist,

    the op says it was not and that they are a woman.

    Women can still be sexist towards other women,
    hell women can even be misogynistic.


  • #300
    My name is URL
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,069 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Sharrow wrote: »
    Women can still be sexist towards other women,
    hell women can even be misogynistic.

    That's something that I see more of in AH than outright & definable M vs F sexism. It's hard to interpret what people are saying at times, and even harder to determine if the person saying it is being ingenuous and sincere in sharing a simple opinion.

    I don't envy mods one bit.. how the hell is it possible to make a judgement call on something that could well be an innocuous and harmless opinion?

    In the majority of instances it's better to allow some misguided person to have their opinions openly questioned than it is to delete them and ban the user on sight just for sharing it. The latter doesn't serve either side well.

    I'm still of the opinion that it's not an overly apparent or damaging problem in the forum, and think that AH mods can, and are well capable of dealing with it more efficiently when given room to use their own discretion rather than having some concrete and immovable rule thrust upon them regarding such topics.


  • Advertisement
  • #301
    Wibbs
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    My name is URL wrote: »
    I don't envy mods one bit.. how the hell is it possible to make a judgement call on something that could well be an innocuous and harmless opinion?
    I reckon it's like good art MniU, often hard to objectively define, but you just know it when you see it. Plus it depends on the user. I've seen some just taking the mickey/having a laugh with a comment* that typed on the keyboard of a couple of some others would look like and would be well out of order. The intention would be very different. I've found that the mods and the community who report such posts get that difference right 99.999% of the time. Like I say, you know it when you see it.










    *inc the much berated so called "Feminazis".

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement