Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Which Camera? **Please read OP first**

1…89111314…36

Comments

  • #502
    Issac
    Registered Users Posts: 508 ✭✭✭Issac


    Issac wrote: »
    Hi everyone.

    I'm new to photography and need a bit of advice. Basically I'm looking for a camera that is small (easily portable) and has a high IQ. My search has led me to discount P&S due to image quality and dslr due to their size, so I have settled on a mirrorless camera and the nex line seems like the most attractive to me. This is where I get stuck...which one of the nex cameras is right for me in terms of value and future-proofing.

    I've narrowed it down to the:

    Nex 6 - with its EVF, advanced hybrid AF system and new 16-50mm power zoom lens. This comes bundles with a memory card and bag for around €929 and is really pushing the boat out budget wise.

    Then there's the 5r with touch screen and the same advanced hybrid AF system but lacks the EVF and comes with the old (bulky) 18-55mm lens. It also includes a bag, memory card and a half days worth of classes for use. I can pick this up for €730 (after Sony cash-back offer)

    Finally the F3 which appears to use an older (CDAF) AF system again lacks the EVF and comes with the 18-55mm lens, memory card, bag and half days tuition for €440 (after cash back).

    If I buy the 5r or F3 I could also get the sigma 30mm prime to make the system more pocketable but I can't afford that if I go with the nex 6. The tuition day would also be be valuable as I haven't used a camera like this before.

    Any advice on what to do? At the moment I'm thinking of picking up the F3 as well as the prime lens and if I get by the photography bug go and upgrade the body to the nex 6 (or whatever) next year. Thanks in advance.

    Bump!


  • #503
    doddly
    Registered Users Posts: 100 ✭✭doddly


    There's a 650d with lens on simply electronics for 579 is that a good price


  • #504
    Issac
    Registered Users Posts: 508 ✭✭✭Issac


    doddly wrote: »
    There's a 650d with lens on simply electronics for 579 is that a good price
    That is a very good price but dslr are just too bulky to carry around for me. With the mirror less cameras I can pop on a pancake lens and they become ultra-portable.
    Having a look at them in conns and the camera centre today.

    Edit: simply electronics appear to have quite a bad rep as a supplier. I'd think twice before dealing with them.


  • #505
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Are you sure you want to spend so much money on a camera if you're only getting into it?
    It sounds like you're somewhat enthralled with some of the technical propaganda.

    You could get a decent workhorse like a Canon G12 or a Nikon P7100 (or their older variants) for around €300ish.


  • #506
    cnocbui
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,109 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Issac wrote: »
    That is a very good price but dslr are just too bulky to carry around for me. With the mirror less cameras I can pop on a pancake lens and they become ultra-portable.
    Having a look at them in conns and the camera centre today.

    Edit: simply electronics appear to have quite a bad rep as a supplier. I'd think twice before dealing with them.

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/offer-listing/B0057LZHBE/ref=sr_1_1_olp?ie=UTF8&qid=1354377179&sr=8-1&condition=new

    +

    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Olympus-M-ZUIKO-DIGITAL-45mm-Lens/dp/B0058G40O8/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1354377254&sr=1-1

    and have fun.


  • #507
    123 LC
    Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭123 LC


    I'm going to buy a camera and my budget is €300. I am looking for one that takes sharp high resolution photos, can anyone lead me in the right direction? Thanks!


  • #508
    Bluefoam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    123 LC wrote: »
    I'm going to buy a camera and my budget is €300. I am looking for one that takes sharp high resolution photos, can anyone lead me in the right direction? Thanks!

    what do you mean by super high resoluton. more megapixels doesnt necessarily mean better quality... but bigger print size. what are your requirements?


  • #509
    123 LC
    Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭123 LC


    Bluefoam wrote: »
    what do you mean by super high resoluton. more megapixels doesnt necessarily mean better quality... but bigger print size. what are your requirements?

    i think i said sharp and high resolution. I'm not an expert with cameras so i don't really understand the difference, but i want the photos to be able to be uploaded to a computer whilst still being sharp and clear.


  • #510
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    123 LC wrote: »
    i think i said sharp and high resolution. I'm not an expert with cameras so i don't really understand the difference, but i want the photos to be able to be uploaded to a computer whilst still being sharp and clear.

    You're not really making much sense here.
    Any modern digital camera can take high resolution images.
    Any modern digital camera can upload image files to a computer.
    Any modern digital camera can take sharp images... in most situations.

    It's that old chestnut of people asking for recommendations for a camera, specifically a 'good' one. :rolleyes:

    Any camera above ten million pixels will have sufficient resolution. The problem is noise. Very high resolution cameras have small photosites and capture less light per unit area. This can make images look fuzzy. Coupled with low light in an environment like a pud you're going to get blurry, fuzzy images as the camera tries to balance noise and exposure.

    So what do you want the camera for? Is for nights out, or walks in bright daylight?


  • Advertisement
  • #511
    Bluefoam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    123 LC wrote: »
    i think i said sharp and high resolution. I'm not an expert with cameras so i don't really understand the difference, but i want the photos to be able to be uploaded to a computer whilst still being sharp and clear.

    BTW computer screens show images in low resolution...


  • #512
    123 LC
    Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭123 LC


    5uspect wrote: »
    You're not really making much sense here.
    Any modern digital camera can take high resolution images.
    Any modern digital camera can upload image files to a computer.
    Any modern digital camera can take sharp images... in most situations.

    It's that old chestnut of people asking for recommendations for a camera, specifically a 'good' one. :rolleyes:

    Any camera above ten million pixels will have sufficient resolution. The problem is noise. Very high resolution cameras have small photosites and capture less light per unit area. This can make images look fuzzy. Coupled with low light in an environment like a pud you're going to get blurry, fuzzy images as the camera tries to balance noise and exposure.

    So what do you want the camera for? Is for nights out, or walks in bright daylight?

    -Sorry I don't know what word i'm looking for, it mustn't be high resolution, clear maybe?
    -I meant i need a camera that can upload photos to the computer, while still looking good in a bigger form on the computer screen (nearly as good as on the small camera screen(even though i know it wont look exactly the same))

    I'll be using the camera for everything from landscape photos, animals, close ups, family photos, parties.....general things people take photos of :P when i look at some of the photos of landscape in the photography forum on boards i see fantastic clear photos, full of all small details, there is no way my own camera at the moment could take those photos...so yes, to reiterate, I am looking for a 'good' camera, the best out there for €300 :P (also my camera at the moment doesnt seem to be able to take photos indoors under the lights without using flash, the photos come out orange and blurry)


  • #513
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    123 LC wrote: »
    -Sorry I don't know what word i'm looking for, it mustn't be high resolution, clear maybe?
    -I meant i need a camera that can upload photos to the computer, while still looking good in a bigger form on the computer screen (nearly as good as on the small camera screen(even though i know it wont look exactly the same))

    I'll be using the camera for everything from landscape photos, animals, close ups, family photos, parties.....general things people take photos of :P when i look at some of the photos of landscape in the photography forum on boards i see fantastic clear photos, full of all small details, there is no way my own camera at the moment could take those photos...so yes, to reiterate, I am looking for a 'good' camera, the best out there for €300 :P (also my camera at the moment doesnt seem to be able to take photos indoors under the lights without using flash, the photos come out orange and blurry)

    The image on the camera's screen looks sharper because it is downsampling it. This means your actual images are slightly blurry. This is either due to camera shake, autofocus issues, moving subjects or poor optics. Using a flash is often the only way to avoid a lot of these.

    You have to realise a lot of those amazing landscapes are taken with expensive SLRs (or often more expensive medium formats) and expensive lenses by skilled photographers who have spent a long time learning their craft. A €300 camera isn't coming really to come close to that level of detail, especially since most cheap cameras lack full manual controls. Something like the Canon or the Nikon cameras I mentioned above would offer you the best solution to approach this level. You could get a decent camera second hand...

    To take photos in low light you need to use fast lenses (wide apertures) and a camera with good noise performance (bigger sensor). So an SLR at a higher ISO with a cheap 50mm f/1.8. The orange colour is due to you setting your white balance incorrectly. See if you camera has a tungsten setting or better yet a custom white balance option.


  • #514
    Issac
    Registered Users Posts: 508 ✭✭✭Issac


    Thanks to all who suggested what camera I go with. I ended up buying the nex-f3 today with the 18-55 and the 16mm lenses, case, memory card, and half days training all in for €490 (after €60 cashback from sony). Delighted with the kit so far.


  • #515
    123 LC
    Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭123 LC


    5uspect wrote: »
    The image on the camera's screen looks sharper because it is downsampling it. This means your actual images are slightly blurry. This is either due to camera shake, autofocus issues, moving subjects or poor optics. Using a flash is often the only way to avoid a lot of these.

    You have to realise a lot of those amazing landscapes are taken with expensive SLRs (or often more expensive medium formats) and expensive lenses by skilled photographers who have spent a long time learning their craft. A €300 camera isn't coming really to come close to that level of detail, especially since most cheap cameras lack full manual controls. Something like the Canon or the Nikon cameras I mentioned above would offer you the best solution to approach this level. You could get a decent camera second hand...

    To take photos in low light you need to use fast lenses (wide apertures) and a camera with good noise performance (bigger sensor). So an SLR at a higher ISO with a cheap 50mm f/1.8. The orange colour is due to you setting your white balance incorrectly. See if you camera has a tungsten setting or better yet a custom white balance option.

    what would your opinion on this camera? http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056820078 it seems to be good value, it was suggested to me.


  • #516
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    123 LC wrote: »

    what would your opinion on this camera? http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056820078 it seems to be good value, it was suggested to me.

    A friend of mine has one. He takes excellent pictures with it. It has a few limitations tho.

    It only has three selectable focus points which can make composing difficult for off center subjects. It doesn't have a focus motor so you have to be careful with lens selection, unless you're happy to manual focus.

    Pair this with Nikon's 35mm prime and you'll have a good low light shooter. The kit lens is okay for general shooting.


  • Advertisement
  • #517
    123 LC
    Registered Users Posts: 670 ✭✭✭123 LC


    I am thinking of buying a bridge camera as the dslr cameras are too dear for me, but i want a better camera than a normal digital camera, which one of these bridge camera's from argos could ye recommened? (under €300)

    http://www.argos.ie/static/Browse/ID72/26695350/c_1/1%7Ccategory_root%7CPhotography%7C14419436/c_2/2%7Ccat_14419436%7CBridge+digital+cameras%7C26695350.htm


  • #518
    B_asil
    Registered Users Posts: 5 ✭B_asil


    @OctovarIan: I have a Canon s95 that I've been thinking of selling for months as I don't use it. I have two DSLR's so rarely get the opportunity to use the s95. It's in excellent condition as I can count the number of times it was used on one hand. I'm not exaggerating. If putting it up for sale on adverts my asking would be €310. If you're interested let me know. It's just over a year old and I have all the original box, etc.


  • #519
    B_asil
    Registered Users Posts: 5 ✭B_asil


    @123 LC: Don't waste your money on a bridge camera like I did a few years ago. Bridge cameras are point and shoots dressed up to look like a DSLR.

    As posted earlier, I'm considering selling a small compact Canon s95. It's small enough to fit into your pocket but has full manual controls which enables you to control things like shutter speed, aperture and light sensitivity (ISO). This is what you get with a DSLR which is much more expensive. Because I'm really into photography, if any of you on this thread purchase this camera before I have to advertise it for sale. I'll happily donate an hour of my time to give the buyer some tuition. Asking price €310.


  • #520
    dirtyghettokid
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,988 ✭✭✭dirtyghettokid


    B_asil wrote: »
    @OctovarIan: I have a Canon s95 that I've been thinking of selling for months as I don't use it. I have two DSLR's so rarely get the opportunity to use the s95. It's in excellent condition as I can count the number of times it was used on one hand. I'm not exaggerating. If putting it up for sale on adverts my asking would be €310. If you're interested let me know. It's just over a year old and I have all the original box, etc.
    B_asil wrote: »
    @123 LC: Don't waste your money on a bridge camera like I did a few years ago. Bridge cameras are point and shoots dressed up to look like a DSLR.

    As posted earlier, I'm considering selling a small compact Canon s95. It's small enough to fit into your pocket but has full manual controls which enables you to control things like shutter speed, aperture and light sensitivity (ISO). This is what you get with a DSLR which is much more expensive. Because I'm really into photography, if any of you on this thread purchase this camera before I have to advertise it for sale. I'll happily donate an hour of my time to give the buyer some tuition. Asking price €310.


    can i just remind you that this forum is not for selling things. if you would like to sell, please head on over to adverts.ie :)

    thanks.


  • #521
    B_asil
    Registered Users Posts: 5 ✭B_asil


    @dirtyghettokid: Sorry about that mod. I just thought someone here might be interested. It's posted on adverts.ie. Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • #522
    Doc Farrell
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,882 ✭✭✭Doc Farrell


    I'm saving my pennies for the Nikon d5200 which should be out in the next few weeks. Any thoughts, good or bad?

    http://reviews.cnet.com/digital-cameras/nikon-d5200-with-18/4505-6501_7-35534445.html

    My last camera was the original d40 which was great fun, so this one is a big step up.


  • #523
    AMPM
    Registered Users Posts: 33 ✭AMPM


    Hi Everyone; no photography knowledge so all advice is welcome.

    I'm buying a camera for my wife as a Christmas present and having spent the last hour looking at all the threads for advice, I would probably go for a bridge camera except that our kids are involved in sports (gymnastics and Karate). My wife's not into photography so it's really just for everyday use, but if the camera was suitable for taking photos of the kids in their sporting activities she would definately make more use of it (daughter is at a very competitivel level of gymnastics)

    I'm assuming that a second hand SLR would be the best option and have looked at a few on adverts.ie. but don't really know where to begin.

    thanks!


  • #524
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    Indoor events are going to have very poor lighting. Without a very fast lens a basic dSLR isn't going to do too well without a flash. Perhaps a camcorder would be better than a still camera?

    A half decent video would be better than a blurry still.


  • #525
    joemonster
    Registered Users Posts: 2 ✭joemonster


    You can try Nikon 1 J2 - very handy 10 megapixel Compact System Camera, high-speed autofocus, Smart Photo Selector, advanced Full HD movies...Expandable system: NIKKOR interchangeable lenses - you can check http://www.photoworldireland.com/gear/nikon-introduces-the-nikon-1-j2/


  • #526
    TPD
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,814 ✭✭✭TPD


    Christmas bonus in today, desire for a camera burning a hole in my online bank account. The two I'm looking at at the minute are the Pentax K30 and the K5 - I'd mostly be using it for landscapes, long exposures, and the odd gig photoshoot. Is the K5 worth the extra money? 50% extra price for what seems like incremental upgrades, but in all areas...

    Edit: I've taken the plunge on a K30 and WR lens.


  • #527
    TheBazman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭TheBazman


    Anyone use ProCameraShop.co.uk? They have the Olympus XZ-1 a good bit cheaper than elsewhere

    Cheers


  • #528
    pamweld
    Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭pamweld


    Hi all have bridge camera and am looking to upgrade to dslr, found bridge frustrating sometimes as have no manual focus, shutter speed or aperture control. in camera club and hoping to start an online photography course soon so lookinh for camera with full manual settings, seen this on adverts and would love your opinion on it
    http://www.adverts.ie/2443861


  • #529
    sebphoto
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭sebphoto


    TheBazman wrote: »
    Anyone use ProCameraShop.co.uk? They have the Olympus XZ-1 a good bit cheaper than elsewhere

    Cheers

    Unfortunately they don't provide manufacturer warranty, but 'in-house warranty' (see Faulty goods section). I was going to buy some stuff from them, but I had to resign.


  • #530
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    pamweld wrote: »
    Hi all have bridge camera and am looking to upgrade to dslr, found bridge frustrating sometimes as have no manual focus, shutter speed or aperture control. in camera club and hoping to start an online photography course soon so lookinh for camera with full manual settings, seen this on adverts and would love your opinion on it
    http://www.adverts.ie/2443861

    Not a bad camera at all. The kit lens isn't the best, but that is where you'll need to invest in the long term, if you get the bug. Remember to be aware of the number of shutter actuations when buying as this affects the life of the camera.

    You could even get one new somewhere for similar money. Argos have the D3000 for example:
    http://www.argos.ie/static/Product/partNumber/5593189.htm
    and the 1100D:
    http://www.argos.ie/static/Product/partNumber/5594463/Trail/searchtext%3ECANON+SLR.htm


  • #531
    TheBazman
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,462 ✭✭✭TheBazman


    sebphoto wrote: »
    Unfortunately they don't provide manufacturer warranty, but 'in-house warranty' (see Faulty goods section). I was going to buy some stuff from them, but I had to resign.

    Cheers - I've been doing a bit of research and have decided to bite the bullet. Doesnt really bother me that it's grey market - If I was buying something a lot more expensive then it would be a different matter. The camera including postage etc is working out at 270 vs 470 to buy it in Dublin


  • Advertisement
  • #532
    pamweld
    Registered Users Posts: 132 ✭✭pamweld


    5uspect wrote: »
    Remember to be aware of the number of shutter actuations when buying as this affects the life of the camera.

    You could even get one new somewhere for similar money. Argos have the D3000 for example:
    http://www.argos.ie/static/Product/partNumber/5593189.htm
    and the 1100D:
    http://www.argos.ie/static/Product/partNumber/5594463/Trail/searchtext%3ECANON+SLR.htm

    5uspect what would a reasonable shutter count be on a second hand camera, have no idea how many are considered normal or close to end life of camera?
    Have been looking at the Canon 1100D but read somewhere on here that it is very basic with plastic body and you can outgrow it quite quickly! Am edging towards the Canon mainly because majority of the people in my camera club are canon and I think it will be good for me as they can give me tips on using my camera as they are so familiar witht he canon settings


  • #533
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    pamweld wrote: »
    5uspect what would a reasonable shutter count be on a second hand camera, have no idea how many are considered normal or close to end life of camera?
    Have been looking at the Canon 1100D but read somewhere on here that it is very basic with plastic body and you can outgrow it quite quickly! Am edging towards the Canon mainly because majority of the people in my camera club are canon and I think it will be good for me as they can give me tips on using my camera as they are so familiar witht he canon settings

    Have a look here:
    http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/

    So the 450D and the 1100D are quite similar, plastic body included. The xxxD series pre-dates the xxxxD series; the 300D came first followed by the 350D, 450D, 500D, 550D, 600D etc, while the 1000D came out around the same time as the 500D and the 1100D about the same time as the 600D.

    With the xxxxD series and others Canon have forked their camera lineup.
    Before you had just the 400D, 40D, the full frame 5D, and the 1D/1Ds.
    Now it's 1100D, 650D, 60D and 7D and the full frame 5D, 6D and 1Dx.

    So a modern 1100D is as good, if not better than an older xxxD like the 450D.
    (It's probably even much the same camera repackaged)

    As I've already said, the important bit is the lens you use. Bodies depreciate quickly, good lenses hold much of their value. So buy a slightly older solid camera and invest in good glass. If you worried about plastic bodies consider getting a second hand 40D or 30D, and a 50mm f/1.8.


  • #534
    paulusdu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 514 ✭✭✭paulusdu


    Hi Guys,

    has anyone had any real life experience with Nikon D800's and Nikon D600's.
    I'm looking at piking up one of them, at the moment i am tending to the D600 after reading some reviews.
    I am slightly put off by the reports of sensors being over sensitive to dust, but thats about the only drawback i can find for it.
    I'd appreciate any thoughts ?

    Paulusdu


  • #535
    laugh
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,745 ✭✭✭laugh


    Good Value:

    http://www.argos.ie/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Search?storeId=10152&catalogId=14551&langId=111&searchTerms=CANON+650D&authToken=

    ?


  • #536
    5uspect
    Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 10,518 Mod ✭✭✭✭5uspect


    laugh wrote: »
    Good Value:

    http://www.argos.ie/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/Search?storeId=10152&catalogId=14551&langId=111&searchTerms=CANON+650D&authToken=

    ?

    It's pretty good alright. Amazon has been tending towards €650.
    http://uk.camelcamelcamel.com/Canon-EOS-650D-Digital-Camera/product/B0089V4CJC


  • #537
    cocococo
    Registered Users Posts: 27 ✭cocococo


    I am totally new to the Photography game but would love to start up my ambition. What i am looking for is a camera that i can take clear ,sharp landscape and portrait photos with. I know i will need different lenses but i saw these advertised and wonder which one to go for.

    http://www.pixmania.ie/ie/uk/11202773/art/canon/eos-600d-ef-s-18-55-mm-is.html

    http://www.pixmania.ie/ie/uk/9691496/art/nikon/d5100-af-s-vr-dx-18-55-mm.html


  • #538
    Wopp
    Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Wopp


    Hi there, I recently got some photography lessons and want a starter camera...there are sooo many cameras mentioned here and in other forums. I have picked out two possibilities if someone could give them a quick look and let me know what you think?

    Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR -
    http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/compact-digital-cameras/fujifilm-finepix-hs30-exr-review-50007695/

    Canon EOS 1100D -
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-1100D-Digital-Camera-3-5-5-6/dp/B004MPQXZA

    Im leaning towards the Fujifilm as it has a lot of features and seems quite user friendly. However, im afraid of buying because the sensor size is much smaller then the cannon and as far as my research goes that matters (however the cannon model is a few years behind the fuji model so maybe its not a big deal).

    Can anyone let me know if its a big mistake to go with the fuji? or is there a starter model better then both i completely missed!! :)

    Thanks in advance for any advice/help!


  • #539
    Maysa07
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,283 ✭✭✭Maysa07


    I have this amazing camera here that a friend is selling. He gave to me to play around with to see what i think.

    It's in excellent condition and don't think he never used it.

    Its a Sony DSC-F828 8MP Digital Camera, from around 2005 and the picture quality is excellent.

    Can someone advise me if it's worth €150 as I'm new to this technology.

    Cheers

    Pat


  • #540
    Wopp
    Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Wopp


    Dont know if it helps, but this is the site iv been using to compare cameras....i have learned a lot so far!!

    http://snapsort.com/compare/Fujifilm-HS30-EXR-vs-Sony_Cyber-shot_DSC-F828

    Also, I dont think you can go too wrong for 150...sony is one of the better brands!


  • Advertisement
  • #541
    Bluefoam
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    Wopp wrote: »
    Dont know if it helps, but this is the site iv been using to compare cameras....i have learned a lot so far!!

    http://snapsort.com/compare/Fujifilm-HS30-EXR-vs-Sony_Cyber-shot_DSC-F828

    Also, I dont think you can go too wrong for 150...sony is one of the better brands!

    I have had 3 Sony compact cameras, one bought about 6 years ago, which was great. One about 3 years ago which was a waste of money and got sold about a week after purchase and one that i bought a year ago which i abandoned because my phone was more practical and takes better pictures. I will never buy sony again.

    I now have a pentax which is light years ahead of sony. Sonys build quality has become cheap and ****ty and they have cut back on the ergonomic and functional quilities to make more money per camera. Avoid at all costs...


  • #542
    Wopp
    Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Wopp


    Wopp wrote: »
    Hi there, I recently got some photography lessons and want a starter camera...there are sooo many cameras mentioned here and in other forums. I have picked out two possibilities if someone could give them a quick look and let me know what you think?

    Fujifilm FinePix HS30 EXR -
    http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/compact-digital-cameras/fujifilm-finepix-hs30-exr-review-50007695/

    Canon EOS 1100D -
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-1100D-Digital-Camera-3-5-5-6/dp/B004MPQXZA

    Im leaning towards the Fujifilm as it has a lot of features and seems quite user friendly. However, im afraid of buying because the sensor size is much smaller then the cannon and as far as my research goes that matters (however the cannon model is a few years behind the fuji model so maybe its not a big deal).

    Can anyone let me know if its a big mistake to go with the fuji? or is there a starter model better then both i completely missed!! :)

    Thanks in advance for any advice/help!
    Bump :)


  • #543
    Sean Quagmire
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,343 ✭✭✭Sean Quagmire


    Looking at compact system cameras at the minute.

    I have it narrowed to two - Sony NEX 5 and the Olympus EPL3. Online reviews differ greatly on these but they are generally considered excellent cameras. I can get a EPL3 for around €300 but the NEX 5 comes in around €600.

    Aesthetically I prefer the Sony but the performance is too similar between them to justify the price. I think Il go with the Oly - anyone here have experience with it?


  • #544
    shanesheridan
    Registered Users Posts: 31 ✭shanesheridan


    anyone see any good deals for Canon 650d? I've been looking but unsure as to the safety and legitimacy of some sites like DLK etc.

    Guess anything in the 650euro mark would be great value (with lense)


  • #545
    flyingsnail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    shanesheridan wrote: »
    anyone see any good deals for Canon 650d? I've been looking but unsure as to the safety and legitimacy of some sites like DLK etc.

    Guess anything in the 650euro mark would be great value (with lense)

    Amazon have it for £515 sterling with a 18-55 IS lens.
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-EOS-650D-Digital-Camera/dp/B0089V4CJC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360150923&sr=8-1


  • #546
    Loki98
    Registered Users Posts: 677 ✭✭✭Loki98


    Got mine off this crowd in December. Arrived after 4 days by DHL.
    http://www.applelectronic.com/


  • Advertisement
  • #547
    shanesheridan
    Registered Users Posts: 31 ✭shanesheridan


    flyingsnail wrote: »
    Amazon have it for £515 sterling with a 18-55 IS lens.
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-EOS-650D-Digital-Camera/dp/B0089V4CJC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1360150923&sr=8-1


    i can't seem to find it for this price


  • #548
    flyingsnail
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,756 ✭✭✭flyingsnail


    I could have swore it was 515 earlier, must have changed it.:(


  • #549
    shanesheridan
    Registered Users Posts: 31 ✭shanesheridan


    thanks anyways!! :)

    Loki98 how reputable is this crowd??

    Has anyone had issues ordering from ebay before?? Not sure if its worth the risk of dodgy equipment


  • #550
    Loki98
    Registered Users Posts: 677 ✭✭✭Loki98


    I paid €541 for a 650D and 18-55 IS lens just before Christmas. I paid thru PayPal and it arrived 4 days later. I had no problems with them. Have a look at their website and decide for yourself if you want to take the risk, but I would recommend paying thru PayPal.


  • #551
    huitzilopochtli
    Closed Accounts Posts: 39 ✭huitzilopochtli


    Hi everyone. I need some information regarding cameras. In particular I need advice on what camera and what other equipment would be most desirable for wildlife photography.

    Bearing in mind that I am not looking to become a professional photographer (on a scale of 1-10 where 1 is amateur with a really bad camera phone and 10 is photos people pay money for, I'd like to reach about a 7) and the budget I have to work with depends largely on how long I can go without food, I'd really appreciate any suggestions as to what equipment would suit my needs.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement