Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Luas Cross City (Line BX/D) [now open]

1…2526283031…99

Comments

  • #1352
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Just wondering when BXD is finished will it be physically possible for a tram from Tallaght to join onto the green line where they cross over ? If so are there any plans to run this type of service or is it seen as unnecessary, with commuters changing trams at Abbey St being the preferred option ?


  • #1353
    Sam Russell
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Just wondering when BXD is finished will it be physically possible for a tram from Tallaght to join onto the green line where they cross over ? If so are there any plans to run this type of service or is it seen as unnecessary, with commuters changing trams at Abbey St being the preferred option ?

    No the links are not suitable for service, only transfer of trams. The one from Tallaght to the Point has to reverse to go towards SSG. SSG to Tallaght is possible.


  • #1354
    Five Lamps
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Five Lamps


    Sam Russell wrote: »
    No the links are not suitable for service, only transfer of trams. The one from Tallaght to the Point has to reverse to go towards SSG. SSG to Tallaght is possible.

    Though it is possible for a northbound tram to do a loop of the city centre and return south to Sandyford. Might be an option on the time table.

    A Sandyford tram could go towards Heuston but there is no practical return path so it will only be run as separate lines.


  • #1355
    Cinephille1888
    Registered Users Posts: 33 ✭Cinephille1888


    Five Lamps wrote: »
    Though it is possible for a northbound tram to do a loop of the city centre and return south to Sandyford. Might be an option on the time table.

    A Sandyford tram could go towards Heuston but there is no practical return path so it will only be run as separate lines.

    Trams from The Point may also head south before abbey street onto Marlborough.

    This may be useful for events.

    However it is a tight turn, and although it is in the plans, it may not be as necessary for stock transfer.


  • #1356
    Five Lamps
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Five Lamps


    Cinephille1888 wrote: »
    Trams from The Point may also head south before abbey street onto Marlborough.

    This may be useful for events.

    However it is a tight turn, and although it is in the plans, it may not be as necessary for stock transfer.

    Sure? http://www.dublinluasbroombridge.ie/Downloads/PlanofProposedWorks/02-STRUCTURES/08_BXD_ST_29_B-C2.pdf

    Looks like the spur joins the east bound track (to The Point/Connolly) and not the eastbound one i.e from The Point. Unless it can make use of the crossover further east? RPA describe the connection as only being used for stock transfer.

    It would cause confusion for Point users. Far simpler for the operators to get people to change and the usual interchanges.


  • Advertisement
  • #1357
    Cinephille1888
    Registered Users Posts: 33 ✭Cinephille1888


    I see that now actually.

    But the arrow and the letters are "Southbound" coming from the point.

    LRT I'm guessing means left running traffic?

    But it does connect to the Eastbound track, which confuses matters.

    Such a manoeuvre would be too complicated for an event tram with other waiting behind. Better to switch trams or take shuttle buses to the green line loop.


  • #1358
    cgcsb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    LRT = Light Rail Transit


  • #1359
    Muahahaha
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,688 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Do people see the inability of the new line design to not make tram transfers from green to red and vice versa as potentially limiting, either now or in the future? I guess the RPA have done their research and found that demand for a (for example) Tallaght to Broombridge service just isn't there. Fair enough. But could it not be a mistake to at least install tracks to make it possible, even if the tracks were rarely used?

    I'm just thinking too for further down the line when we might see a third line installed and as the network grows so too does the combinations of starting and finishing points for trams. If for example a Blanch to Rathfarmham line were built and it has the tracks for the tram to switch line then that opens up the possibility of Blanch to IFSC or onto the Green line out to Sandyford. Does anyone know do the operators tend to make a decision on preferring customers to transfer at line interchanges or if the above is ever a possibility in the future?


  • #1360
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    It's better to have fewer lines and for people to transfer than to have multiple routes sharing the same tracks.


  • #1361
    GerardKeating
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,711 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Aard wrote: »
    It's better to have fewer lines and for people to transfer than to have multiple routes sharing the same tracks.

    I think every Metro/LRT/Underground map I have every seen would disagree with this.


  • Advertisement
  • #1362
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Do people see the inability of the new line design to not make tram transfers from green to red and vice versa as potentially limiting, either now or in the future? I guess the RPA have done their research and found that demand for a (for example) Tallaght to Broombridge service just isn't there. Fair enough. But could it not be a mistake to at least install tracks to make it possible, even if the tracks were rarely used?

    I'm just thinking too for further down the line when we might see a third line installed and as the network grows so too does the combinations of starting and finishing points for trams. If for example a Blanch to Rathfarmham line were built and it has the tracks for the tram to switch line then that opens up the possibility of Blanch to IFSC or onto the Green line out to Sandyford. Does anyone know do the operators tend to make a decision on preferring customers to transfer at line interchanges or if the above is ever a possibility in the future?

    There is physically not enough space to have any other connection at Marlborough Street / Abbey Street other than that proposed. That's the reality of the situation.

    I don't think it is beyond the ability of people to switch from one line to another - the stops are around the corner from one another.

    There has been an entire consultation process for the BXD Green Line extension which was heavily publicised - you had an opportunity to review the plans then and make a submission on it, which clearly your didn't.

    The planned weekday service patterns on the Green Line are (I understand) going to be: Parnell to Brides Glen and Sandyford to Broombridge.


  • #1363
    ArmaniJeanss
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Do people see the inability of the new line design to not make tram transfers from green to red and vice versa as potentially limiting, either now or in the future? I guess the RPA have done their research and found that demand for a (for example) Tallaght to Broombridge service just isn't there. Fair enough. But could it not be a mistake to at least install tracks to make it possible, even if the tracks were rarely used?

    I'm just thinking too for further down the line when we might see a third line installed and as the network grows so too does the combinations of starting and finishing points for trams. If for example a Blanch to Rathfarmham line were built and it has the tracks for the tram to switch line then that opens up the possibility of Blanch to IFSC or onto the Green line out to Sandyford. Does anyone know do the operators tend to make a decision on preferring customers to transfer at line interchanges or if the above is ever a possibility in the future?

    I think having to 'make a change' is perfectly reasonable (and standard enough worldwide) so long as the distance isn't extreme. The current planned walk from say Abbey St station to O'Connell St station is probably less than that if you were swapping from Bakerloo to District in a London Tube station and had to walk a long corridor, up two escalators, and down a small stairwell to get to your second platform.


  • #1364
    cgcsb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Do people see the inability of the new line design to not make tram transfers from green to red and vice versa as potentially limiting, either now or in the future? I guess the RPA have done their research and found that demand for a (for example) Tallaght to Broombridge service just isn't there. Fair enough. But could it not be a mistake to at least install tracks to make it possible, even if the tracks were rarely used?

    I'm just thinking too for further down the line when we might see a third line installed and as the network grows so too does the combinations of starting and finishing points for trams. If for example a Blanch to Rathfarmham line were built and it has the tracks for the tram to switch line then that opens up the possibility of Blanch to IFSC or onto the Green line out to Sandyford. Does anyone know do the operators tend to make a decision on preferring customers to transfer at line interchanges or if the above is ever a possibility in the future?

    It would be a waste of space and additional maintenance and construction. At present bothe the red and green line will exceed their capacities anyway so there will be no peak hour available paths on either line anyway. The only way we could have a sandyford tallaght or tallaght broombridge service is by reducing the normal services which would be completely unacceptable, it would mean some tallaght trams missing out on the abbey st stop and rail connections at Connolly, also some sandyfor trams would miss rail connections at broombridge and wouldn't connect well into the northside.

    Also the link between the two routes is only really usefull for people changing between central sections, e.g. Ranelagh-Heuston, Dominick st to the point etc. people aren't going to use it for Tallaght-Sandyford journeys which can be made quicker by bus


  • #1365
    Five Lamps
    Closed Accounts Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Five Lamps


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Do people see the inability of the new line design to not make tram transfers from green to red and vice versa as potentially limiting, either now or in the future? I guess the RPA have done their research and found that demand for a (for example) Tallaght to Broombridge service just isn't there. Fair enough. But could it not be a mistake to at least install tracks to make it possible, even if the tracks were rarely used?

    I'm just thinking too for further down the line when we might see a third line installed and as the network grows so too does the combinations of starting and finishing points for trams. If for example a Blanch to Rathfarmham line were built and it has the tracks for the tram to switch line then that opens up the possibility of Blanch to IFSC or onto the Green line out to Sandyford. Does anyone know do the operators tend to make a decision on preferring customers to transfer at line interchanges or if the above is ever a possibility in the future?

    Not at all. This is how most services are designed - as lines A to B with connecting tracks for engineering purposes.

    Future lines will be designed in the same way - A to B and change to other lines at various stops.


  • #1366
    Sam Russell
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    A sensible link would be to for the red line to go down HighSt and onto College Green and link with the Green line allowing Tallaght to Parnell Sq. and out the BXD.


  • #1367
    GerardKeating
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,711 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Five Lamps wrote: »
    Not at all. This is how most services are designed - as lines A to B with connecting tracks for engineering purposes.

    Future lines will be designed in the same way - A to B and change to other lines at various stops.

    Seems a bit DAFT, and the total opposite to how all other Rail/LRT/Tram/Bus networks operate.


  • #1368
    AngryLips
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    GerardKeating wrote: »
    Seems a bit DAFT, and the total opposite to how all other Rail/LRT/Tram/Bus networks operate.

    I think LRTs that run every combination of every route is the exception as oppose to the norm. I don't know of any, in fact.


  • #1369
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    You can have a simple "X" arrangement of lines, like the Red and Green lines will be. Alternatively you can have up to 6 lines taking advantage of each branch. The problem with that is that it complicates the service pattern, the centrepoint of the system sees more conflict with all the turning patterns, and customers will still have to transfer or else wait for the next tram to their destined branch which could be 20 minutes away off peak.


  • #1370
    GerardKeating
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,711 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    AngryLips wrote: »
    I think LRTs that run every combination of every route is the exception as oppose to the norm. I don't know of any, in fact.

    Of course not every possible combination, not enough crayons in the pack for that, but the comment I replied to said there would be no overlapping routes.


  • #1371
    AngryLips
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    GerardKeating wrote: »
    Of course not every possible combination, not enough crayons in the pack for that, but the comment I replied to said there would be no overlapping routes.

    They already exist, Heuston to Connolly overlaps with Tallaght/Saggart to the Point. Stephen's Green to Sandyford overlaps with Stephen's Green to wherever it is beyond that.


  • Advertisement
  • #1372
    Van.Bosch
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    I had originally thought the green loop should go down abbey street so people could change on the same platform but I now think the current setup is preferable. As already stated walking around a corner is no different to London Underground for example. Running services on existing lines just complicates and restricts capacity. In a way the northern line is a good example, if the train is a few minutes late it can get stuck behind a DART and crawl to Malahide. The Luas wouldn't be as extreme but it adds unnecessary bottlenecks into the system.

    The Lucan line sharing with Red in parts could have similar issues?

    Thinking about it again, this may be rubbish, other cities have multiple routes running on central lines in the city.


  • #1373
    The Dark Knight
    Registered Users Posts: 340 ✭✭The Dark Knight


    Just wondering does anybody know the Travel Time for the BXD line.
    For example, what will the time be from Broombridge to Stephens Green?


  • #1374
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The Dark Knight wrote: »
    Just wondering does anybody know the Travel Time for the BXD line.
    For example, what will the time be from Broombridge to Stephens Green?



    21 minutes to travel the 5.6Km from St. Stephen’s Green to Broombridge
    24 minutes to travel the 5.9km from Broombridge to St. Stephen’s Green


  • #1375
    Godge
    Closed Accounts Posts: 21,727 ✭✭✭✭Godge


    Van.Bosch wrote: »
    I had originally thought the green loop should go down abbey street so people could change on the same platform but I now think the current setup is preferable. As already stated walking around a corner is no different to London Underground for example. Running services on existing lines just complicates and restricts capacity. In a way the northern line is a good example, if the train is a few minutes late it can get stuck behind a DART and crawl to Malahide. The Luas wouldn't be as extreme but it adds unnecessary bottlenecks into the system.

    The Lucan line sharing with Red in parts could have similar issues?

    Thinking about it again, this may be rubbish, other cities have multiple routes running on central lines in the city.

    The solution is to have the Red line from Tallaght/CityWest continue down to College Green rather than turning down to Heuston.

    The Lucan line could use the Red line to Heuston from the Point and out the N4.


  • #1376
    GerardKeating
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,711 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Godge wrote: »
    The solution is to have the Red line from Tallaght/CityWest continue down to College Green rather than turning down to Heuston.

    The Lucan line could use the Red line to Heuston from the Point and out the N4.

    If it was my pack of crayons, the City West Junction would be a tri-angular junction, as it was in the origional plans, as would where the Lucan line joins Tallaght line, and then where it splits away again, and also at College Green.

    They would allow Tallaght/Sagart/Lucan trams to go to the city either via the Liberties, or the existing north city Line and a circular service College Green - Liberties - Huestion - Smithfield - College Green.

    Service pattern can be change quickly with a Bus, but Rails are less flexible, so needs to be built in.


  • #1377
    Jamie2k9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    Quick question, will the roads and footpaths be redone again once the line is more less in place. The place looks a bit messy with patches or tar thrown everywhere. Around College Green area. They done the works on O'Connell st area much better not all the patchy work like on College Green. I know the works needed at College Green are much bigger etc.


  • #1378
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    Short answer - yes. Such projects generally are designed from one building line across to the other, footpaths included.


  • #1379
    Cinephille1888
    Registered Users Posts: 33 ✭Cinephille1888


    Has anyone seen the current site at the Parnell Monument at the entrance to O'Connel Street?

    The sharp curve forces Buses and long streams of taxi's and bikes to spit out at higher speeds right into a pedestrian crossing.


    It's a crossing pedestrians rarely wait for as it is, and it's just become more dangerous.

    Even several meters down at Cathal Brugagh Street the traffic is somewhat notably faster as a result.

    The blind-ish turn is just shooting vehicles out as they accelerate on their way out of the turn.

    It will take an accident for someone to notice.

    Which reminds me, there was an accident today.

    But on Bolton Street.

    I saw Garda and an Ambulance attend to someone put onto a back board at the hole in the ground at the traffic lights at Dominick Street.

    Other people heard a clatter of metal, another a scream. Someone was hurt, either in the hole, or crossing the road.

    They were taken away rather quickly as I could see from the top floor of Bolton street, but still rather serious.


  • #1380
    trellheim
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,964 ✭✭✭trellheim


    I have had a good look and cant find any updates on the Maxol/BXD/Broadstone issue , anyone know whats going on , its a bit "Comical Ali" at this stage , if they were going eminent domain on it you'd have seen the CPO by now I would have thought ?


  • Advertisement
  • #1381
    nowecant
    Registered Users Posts: 332 ✭✭nowecant


    I would keep an eye on the DIT Grangegorman thread where that is a big concern as well and i havent seen a thing about it.

    Last i heard they were going to continue the development of the entrance plaza 'around' the Maxol garage. Madness!!

    I think work was to start on that in early 2015 if memory serves me right


  • #1382
    mrsdewinter
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,162 ✭✭✭mrsdewinter


    I see they've started clearing undergrowth on the old line that runs under Cabra Road. It's not much but it's great to see some progress on the project away from the city centre.


  • #1383
    eminoz
    Registered Users Posts: 34 ✭eminoz


    mrsdewinter wrote: »
    I see they've started clearing undergrowth on the old line that runs under Cabra Road. It's not much but it's great to see some progress on the project away from the city centre.

    Agree! At it a few weeks now.
    There have been drainage problems here for years; what they're doing is laying a foundation for the (eventual) tracks which will also hopefully overcome the swamp-like conditions.


  • #1384
    Jamie2k9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    RPA have finally approved a northbound Dawson St stop.


  • #1385
    AngryLips
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    RPA have finally approved a northbound Dawson St stop.

    Are the plans from it any different from the original plans? Because, if not, then what was all the fuss about in the first place?


  • #1386
    Telchak
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 888 ✭✭✭Telchak


    AngryLips wrote: »
    Are the plans from it any different from the original plans? Because, if not, then what was all the fuss about in the first place?

    Originally the two platforms were at separate parts of the street, now they're directly across from each other.


  • Advertisement
  • #1387
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Jamie2k9 wrote: »
    RPA have finally approved a northbound Dawson St stop.



    Well actually it's An Bord Pleanala that has approved it. The RPA were proposing it.


    More info here:
    https://www.luascrosscity.ie/news/donohoe-welcomes-decision-on-dawson-st-northbound-luas-cross-city-stop/
    Donohoe welcomes decision on Dawson St northbound Luas Cross City stop

    The Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport, Paschal Donohoe TD, has today (Thursday) welcomed the decision by An Bord Pleanála to allow the Railway Procurement Agency (RPA) to develop a northbound stop on Dawson Street as part of Luas Cross City.


    The new Luas line, Luas Cross City, which will run from the Green Line terminus at St. Stephen’s Green through the city centre, Phibsborough and Cabra to Broombridge, is on budget and on time for opening in Q4 2017. Provision has already been made for a southbound stop on Dawson Street.


    The decision of the Board was based on the fact that the proposed development would be in accordance with the proper planning and sustainable development in the area. The RPA, together with the National Transport Authority (NTA), who are funding Luas Cross City, will now include and plan for a northbound stop on Dawson Street.


    Minister Donohoe said: ‘It is very welcome news that An Bord Pleanála has ruled to allow for a northbound stop on Dawson Street to be constructed as part of the new line. Luas Cross City is set to see what is an already extremely successful piece of transport infrastructure grow even further, with an additional 10 million journeys expected each year when it comes on stream.


    “I know that this application had widespread support from key stakeholders in the business community, Dublin City Council, Dublin Bus and the community generally; a fact that has been acknowledged by both the RPA and the NTA. In particular, the business representative groups Dublin Town, Dublin City Business Association and Dublin Chamber of Commerce, together with individual businesses, offered fulsome support.


    “I also know that the Luas Cross City team has been very active on the ground in engaging with local businesses as works have been progressing and that businesses along Dawson Street were particularly keen to have a northbound stop located there. This decision now means that a stop will be positioned half way between the St. Stephen’s Green and Westmoreland Street stops, leaving just 500 metres between stops. This means that access to the National Gallery, Trinity College, the National Library and other tourist attractions will be considerably enhanced. Accessibility for commuters getting around the city centre will also be significantly improved.


    “As provision was already made in the contract for a northbound stop, there will be no additional costs or time added to the project on the back of this decision.”


  • #1388
    AngryLips
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Luas Cross City is set to see what is an already extremely successful piece of transport infrastructure grow even further, with an additional 10 million journeys expected each year when it comes on stream.

    I have a feeling usage figures will be much higher than this.


  • #1389
    grimbergen
    Registered Users Posts: 312 ✭✭grimbergen


    AngryLips wrote: »
    I have a feeling usage figures will be much higher than this.

    So do I. Don't know if its a sign of an improving economy but the green line these days is mobbed in the peak hours, much more so than say 2-3 years ago.

    I wonder when the new line is open whether there'll be the possibility of increasing the frequency in those hours, seeing as the trams won't have to be dwelling at the stephen's green stop?


  • #1390
    Schadenfreudia
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    grimbergen wrote: »
    So do I. Don't know if its a sign of an improving economy but the green line these days is mobbed in the peak hours, much more so than say 2-3 years ago.

    Indeed. Including the extension to Cherrywood which I recall was slated here for being "developer led" and going through "empty countryside"!


    Now they'd need those Japanese passenger-pushers to get the people into the trams by the time they reach Glencairn between 7.30 and 9am.


  • #1391
    AngryLips
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Just thinking about how packed the luas gets already: shouldn't there be a turnback facility on the green line somewhere in the south city centre to compliment the loop on the north city to facilitate higher frequencies between North and South City centre? Similar to Heuston-Connolly services on the red line.


  • Advertisement
  • #1392
    Schadenfreudia
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    I think northbound trams can turn right at the top of O'Connell St and head back south again; so the could have a Sandyford - Parnell Sq route for the most packed section.

    And a less frequent Broombridge to Brides Glen? (Don't know how busy they expect Broombridge to Parnell to be)


  • #1393
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    The plan is to operate from Brides Glen to Parnell and Sandyford to Broombridge.


  • #1394
    cgcsb
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,753 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    I don't see why the turn back at Stephen's green would be removed in case of disruption, say a protest on college green.


  • #1395
    Schadenfreudia
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    lxflyer wrote: »
    The plan is to operate from Brides Glen to Parnell and Sandyford to Broombridge.

    That means those Northsiders will have to change to get to my nearest stop (Ballyogan)! Some good news ;)

    Regarding the turn back at Stephens Green - surely the'll just leave it in place?


  • #1396
    Jamie2k9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    cgcsb wrote: »
    I don't see why the turn back at Stephen's green would be removed in case of disruption, say a protest on college green.

    Are they really removing it, seems completely pointless.


  • #1397
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Schadenfreudia wrote: »
    That means those Northsiders will have to change to get to my nearest stop (Ballyogan)! Some good news ;)

    Regarding the turn back at Stephens Green - surely the'll just leave it in place?

    I never said anything about the turnback at St Stephen's Green, but rather posted what the intended operating pattern was.

    There will be a turnback siding on St Stephen's Green North for trams coming from Brides Glen/Sandyford for use when required.

    It will not be accessible to/from Dawson Street.


  • #1398
    Schadenfreudia
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,995 ✭✭✭Schadenfreudia


    I was replying to the csgb post regarding the turn-back. Trying to economise on the use of posts...sorry for any confusion.


  • #1399
    stop
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭stop


    cgcsb wrote: »
    I don't see why the turn back at Stephen's green would be removed in case of disruption, say a protest on college green.

    Last I looked at the plans, there was a turn back (siding?) marked in on Stephen's Green North, adjacent to where the Christmas market is.
    It is seperate to the main lines, and can hold a tram without blocking the points.


  • #1400
    LXFlyer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,917 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    stop wrote: »
    Last I looked at the plans, there was a turn back (siding?) marked in on Stephen's Green North, adjacent to where the Christmas market is.
    It is seperate to the main lines, and can hold a tram without blocking the points.

    As I posted 2 posts previous to yours!


  • #1401
    Aard
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    I think what people are suggesting (and I might have picked it up wrong) is that there should be a turnback to allow, say, Broombridge<>Dominick services in cases where the city centre is at a standstill. The same way that the Red line often ends up terminating at Smithfield when there is a problem in town.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement