Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M7 - Nenagh to Limerick

17810121347

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    The extra land take was also a waste of money. I drew a map of my layout and there was less landtake.

    The truth is, If my plan went ahead, it would work much better. It's not but we have a country run by people who can't run it very well.

    Geeeeeeeeeeeeee


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious



    At the moment the houses are between a National Road and a slip road. When the motorway is built they will be between a a sliproad and a cul de sac. The road will be carrying the same amount of traffic.





    Well that's nice.


    It would be a lot more sense to design and build a bridge east of the interchange where the actual tie in of the C-N scheme and where the old alignment of the R445 goes. But it seems we want to keep the old layout for some strange reason. It is strange because the old layout wasn't a motorway and it tied into the existing layout. This interchange layout was not designed to be a motorway.

    Its just a headache as the effort they put into to keeping this new layout. It's laughable if in a good humour.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭The Word Is Bor


    A full junction to the east would require more land to be CPO'd.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    A full junction to the east would require more land to be CPO'd.

    I love how you put the word "full junction" They are building these interchanges all over the country at present. Nothing unusual may I add.

    to oversize it like. King size. etc.:rolleyes:

    There wouldn't be much extra land its basically right where the old R445 runs pre bypass. I know this area darn well. I've done a design. My bridge isn't fat "overflowing" or "over full" either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,538 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    mysterious wrote: »
    The extra land take was also a waste of money. I drew a map of my layout and there was less landtake.

    The truth is, If my plan went ahead, it would work much better. It's not but we have a country run by people who can't run it very well.

    Geeeeeeeeeeeeee

    You drew a map which, as with every map you ever draw, has no concept of the Z-Axis and was probably unbuildable or would have required insane earth works to construct.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    MYOB wrote: »
    You drew a map which, as with every map you ever draw, has no concept of the Z-Axis and was probably unbuildable or would have required insane earth works to construct.

    Probably this, and probably that.

    If you actually had common sense and looked at the map I provided you would know there would praticaly no earthworks. It's the mere bridge thats it. My alignment is the old N7 running east to west pre Nenagh bypass. The land is Flat. The only dulation and altitude changing is the trenches and verges that were raised as the Nenagh bypass was constructed.

    In fact. The NRA redesign of the junction has phenomenal earth works. Building Slips ways each side, Three roundabouts, Modifications to the existings cul de sac and dig up of the old LILO etc. The WB nenagh R445 slip has to be de trenched now as this is been widened to give two way traffic so it can access the Arch bridge.


    I'm pretty familar with the area. I have made good drawing and took all factors into consideration. I use this road quite regulary.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭The Word Is Bor


    mysterious wrote: »

    If you actually had common sense and looked at the map I provided you would know there would praticaly no earthworks...The land is Flat.

    Hold up here chief. You want to build a full dumb-bell interchnage in are where the land is flat and you think that there will be "practically no earthworks"?

    What about the embankment for the bridge/abutments etc? The embankments for the 4 No. sliproads? Not to mention the associated roundabouts, dealing with the R445.

    If you know the area so well, do you suppose that the local landowners would be in favour of your design given that it would require additional lands to CPO'd? Build a new junction a couple of hundred metres from an existing junction?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Alright some updates:

    Overbridge south of daly's cross

    DSC02583.jpg

    The boggy section is still in trouble

    DSC02580.jpg

    DSC02581.jpg

    A bit further up from it:
    DSC02582.jpg

    View from the overbridge looking south:
    DSC02585.jpg

    Looking north:
    DSC02584.jpg

    Another pic of the overbridge which a few posters wanted to know how it was designed
    DSC02579.jpg

    Approaching the newport interchange which has not been posted up before:
    DSC02587.jpg

    The northbound ramp:
    DSC02586.jpg

    Last but not least there is some wearing course laid on one carriageway below the R504 overbridge:

    DSC02578.jpg

    DSC02577.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,082 ✭✭✭Chris_533976


    Do I see a bulgey carriageway overbridge??? :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    Looks like you were busy yesterday, Tech2! How long in kilometres is that unadvanced part through the bog?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Do I see a bulgey carriageway overbridge???

    Looks like it alright, not as bad as the M8 bit from Cashel - Mitchelstown though!
    Furet wrote: »
    Looks like you were busy yesterday, Tech2! How long in kilometres is that unadvanced part through the bog?

    Indeed I had a bit of spare time to catch up on how the schemes were progressing.

    The mainline stretches along the bog for about 2km. It's not very far. I was going to walk the whole length of it but I was getting some strange looks from workers around there.

    I was also very tempted to drive from Daly's cross to maybe the Birdhill interchange as there is access to the mainline from there. I will definitely drive the whole length of it before it opens.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Just a quick update. I'm not impressed with the contractors of this scheme. I personally think the company should go to hell at this rate.

    Get a bloody move on with this.

    Though on a more positive note (ignoring the top) They have finished the Eastbound Carriegway on the Nenagh bypass. Though two traffic lanes are used to EB and WB movements while the new WB carriegway is getting its final layer. There are a few ganties up also. The HS is shown for most of it's lenght. The Dolla road bridge is ok to me. It's not as narrow as I thought. There is a small margin of HS there so It's acceptable to me.

    The bridge before Dolla (at the hill where the climbling lane use to persist) Is wide enough for a full cross section motorway carriegway underneath, but I don't think they put in a full HS there. I'm not entirely sure.


    The Nenagh bypass end at the Castletown tie in side have works well underway. How are they going to resolve the Arch bridge layout. It seems awfully narrow to me as the curved arch seems dangerously close to a possible 2nd Verge carriegway underneath. How will they treat this bridge? What is been done? Can they lower the Carriegway a metre or two to give more clearance from the arch??


    Btw Traffic on the N7 was notorious.The bypass had a constant stream of traffic more than usual for a wednesday autumn evening.:confused:


    I'm really sick o waiting for this route to finish.


    (I was planting flowers at the N7 road sidetoday):D
    Will be planting more daffodils and some roadside trees also. I'm getting off my arse to do some nature work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    mysterious wrote: »
    Though on a more positive note (ignoring the top) They have finished the Eastbound Carriegway on the Nenagh bypass. Though two traffic lanes are used to EB and WB movements while the new WB carriegway is getting its final layer. There are a few ganties up also. The HS is shown for most of it's lenght. The Dolla road bridge is ok to me. It's not as narrow as I thought. There is a small margin of HS there so It's acceptable to me.

    This is excellent news. December is looking good still IMO.

    I wonder will the Nenagh bypass have motorway restrictions once both carriageways are complete?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭Zoney


    tech2:

    I was under the impression that legally speaking it is motorway already since the first reclassifications.

    Months and months ago I spotted blue countdown markers approaching the new intermediate Thurles Road junction on westbound.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,082 ✭✭✭Chris_533976


    Technically it is a motorway but apparently they're not applying the restrictions, whatever that means legally.

    The way I see it, its a motorway now and L drivers and tractors shouldnt be on it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    It's not a motorway until construction is finished. It's still the N7.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    The way I see it, its a motorway now and L drivers and tractors shouldnt be on it.

    Why? It's still single carriageway, no signs saying motorway ahead, consistent N7 signage, still under construction. :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭The Word Is Bor


    mysterious wrote: »
    Just a quick update. I'm not impressed with the contractors of this scheme. I personally think the company should go to hell at this rate.

    Get a bloody move on with this.

    Which scheme/contractors are you talking about?


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭blackwarrior


    What's going on out at Herbert's pub? The motorway going west seems to stop for 800m from there until the overbridge over the railway. Is this the sinkage problem? Its like they're still doing drainage and foundations.

    Can be seen clearly if you look at it from the M7 overbridge just east of Herberts - I was there yesterday.

    I'm no road engineer, but there looks like months of work to do there.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    As I said here months ago; this road will not be opened before 2010. And I'm usually never wrong :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    What's going on out at Herbert's pub? The motorway going west seems to stop for 800m from there until the overbridge over the railway. Is this the sinkage problem? Its like they're still doing drainage and foundations.

    Can be seen clearly if you look at it from the M7 overbridge just east of Herberts - I was there yesterday.

    I'm no road engineer, but there looks like months of work to do there.

    Where is herberts pub? South of dalys's cross?


  • Registered Users Posts: 203 ✭✭bacon&cabbage


    tech2 wrote: »
    Where is herberts pub? South of dalys's cross?

    Yes between Daly's cross and the Level crossing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Any updates on the Nenagh bypass?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭The Word Is Bor


    I'll take a drive down there tomorrow. They were working on the railway bridge to build the new parapets and thin surface course was going down last week.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    mysterious wrote: »
    (I was planting flowers at the N7 road sidetoday):D
    Will be planting more daffodils and some roadside trees also. I'm getting off my arse to do some nature work.

    Plant larch or maple for some autumn colour; the NRA have given up on that!


  • Registered Users Posts: 122 ✭✭nordisk celt83


    Keep up the good work mysterious. It's great to see there's till some civic-minded and proud people in our country!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Looking at the M9 section a Mullivat, I was astonished how quickly the interchange has transformed over the last few weeks. The section only stretches a few kilometres and was covered in puddles and mud only last month.

    The boggy part of the M7 near Daly's cross is similar in distance and I reckon when the major concrete works are complete this will be done as quickly as seen on the Mullivat interchange. The rest of the M7 will probably be lined and studded before any blacktop goes on this section.


  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭csd


    Here are some pics of progress on the Nenagh bypass section, taken yesterday. Full-size versions are in the SABRE gallery.

    1. Heading west, approaching the bypass.
    normal_01_Approaching_Nenagh_BP.JPG

    2. Start of the bypass, the original GSJ is now having west-facing slips added.
    normal_02_Nenagh_BP_north_jcn.JPG

    3. Just after the previous picture, approaching the works.
    normal_03_Start_Nenagh_BP.JPG

    4. Start of the new D2 section.
    normal_04_Start_dual_section.JPG

    5. Approaching the new junction with the R498
    normal_05_intermediate_junction.JPG

    6. Under one of the original structures
    normal_06_bridge.JPG

    7. End of the original WS2 bypass.
    normal_07_end_junction.JPG

    8. Heading back eastbound, a close-up of the hard shoulder under the bridge from 6 above.
    normal_08_under_bridge.JPG

    9. Gantry for the R498 junction is up eastbound.
    normal_09_Gantry.JPG

    /csd


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Great updates csd.

    Are both sides nearly completed?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭csd


    tech2 wrote: »
    Great updates csd.

    Are both sides nearly completed?

    Yeah I'd say both sides are substantially done. The westbound carriageway needs lining, and the tie-in has a bit to go at the western end, but otherwise looks good.

    Does anyone know how the tie-in at the eastern end (Castletown to Nenagh scheme) is supposed to work? There doesn't appear to have been anything done under the eastern GSJ, so I'm wondering will that be left to the C-N scheme to finish.

    /csd


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 254 ✭✭The Word Is Bor


    Barriers need to be completed along with signs/lines/studs on the westbound carriageway. The railway underbridge is still being worked on at the moment. They appear to have removed the facing stone from the old wall, which is still standing. The western section of the bypass still need to be resurfaced but it might depend on how they intend to use the junction on a temporary basis until the entire scheme opens up. The Thurles junction looks to be sustantially complete bar signs and lines but as usual the last 5% of any scheme is the hardest to complete.

    The eastern Nenagh interchange is being constructed as part of the Castletown-Nenagh scheme. The actual tie in point is about 500m or so west of the Nenagh Arch Bridge.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    csd wrote: »
    Does anyone know how the tie-in at the eastern end (Castletown to Nenagh scheme) is supposed to work?
    /csd

    Was there last week and wondered the very same thing. No sign of any work east of the GSJ or along the western end of Castletown-Nenagh. Anyone seen a drawing of the proposed junction?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    csd wrote: »
    Here are some pics of progress on the Nenagh bypass section, taken yesterday. Full-size versions are in the SABRE gallery.

    8. Heading back eastbound, a close-up of the hard shoulder under the bridge from 6 above.
    normal_08_under_bridge.JPG


    /csd

    This bridge can fit a HS through it, why did they went through the hassle of making it narrow here? This is ****ing retarded.


    Now we learn the NRA can't use rulers and measurements.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    mysterious wrote: »
    This is ****ing retarded. Now we learn the NRA can't use rulers and measurements.

    mysterious, I'm probably wasting my time here, but could you please try to cut down on the blustering bad language and insults?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,639 ✭✭✭Zoney


    mysterious, this is just a guess, but maybe, just maybe, that barrier that takes up space and prevents a full width hard shoulder is needed to protect the bridge supports. You know, so that if someone crashes off the hard shoulder they don't bring the whole bridge down?!

    I don't understand this fixation with the hard shoulder under just one tight bridge. Would you really prefer we spent money replacing the whole bridge?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭AlanD


    I don't see why it matters either. If the road is to be motorway then noone can use the hard shoulder anyway. It may not be technically correct according to defined standards, but in the bigger scheme of things I can't see why it really matters.

    Money spent replacing the bridge would have been madness. Giving out about what was designed years ago, doesn't change anything. It is how it is.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    Throughout the UK, Germany and probably the entire known universe motorways which have been widened lose their hard shoulders under bridges. Why is this a problem?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,107 ✭✭✭nordydan


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Throughout the UK, Germany and probably the entire known universe motorways which have been widened lose their hard shoulders under bridges. Why is this a problem?

    Indeed, there is no requirement for HS under a short stretch of bridge IMO. We're not talking about the Mont Blanc tunnel here, only 40-50m max.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Lining has been started on the eastbound carriageway below the R504 overbridge

    DSC02608.jpg

    DSC02609.jpg

    Either blacktop or the final wearing course is being applied here at the tie in with the M7 SRR

    DSC02607.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3 Shama1


    Hey guys, Anyone got an update on when the Nenagh to Limerick section will open to traffic? I thought it was to open Oct/Nov .. so soon maybe ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭ki


    In the Nenagh Guardian



    The National Roads Authority has confirmed that it is about to open the first section of the Nenagh-Limerick stretch of the new M7 motorway.
    In a significant development for the project the NRA is upgrading the existing N7 Nenagh bypass to motorway standard.

    Read More

    http://www.nenaghguardian.ie/news-detail.php?article=QJD4KK


  • Registered Users Posts: 91 ✭✭clon


    mid december is what the word is on this


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    mysterious, any chance you could post a few pictures of surfacing prgress in this thread?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭mysterious


    Zoney wrote: »
    mysterious, this is just a guess, but maybe, just maybe, that barrier that takes up space and prevents a full width hard shoulder is needed to protect the bridge supports. You know, so that if someone crashes off the hard shoulder they don't bring the whole bridge down?!

    I don't understand this fixation with the hard shoulder under just one tight bridge. Would you really prefer we spent money replacing the whole bridge?


    My annoyance was purely the fact that this bridge is wide. It's the widest bridge on the bypass. Its the reason why I can't understand why they didn't just continue the HS rather than just stopping it. This is the bridge on the top of the hill as your coming from Limerick.

    Though onto the recent topic. I can't wait for the Nenagh bypass to open up. The Thurles interchange shall allow more people from Mid Tipp to access the N7 without having to pass through the town. The Thurles - Nenagh road is a busy R road. So this is very welcomed.
    Furet wrote: »
    mysterious, any chance you could post a few pictures of surfacing prgress in this thread?


    I'm really sorry I haven't been doing so Furet. My camera is not working atm. But I do have at least 20 pics on my camera phone but I can't send it. I will pm you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 76 ✭✭ilovegermany


    clon wrote: »
    mid december is what the word is on this


    Is that mid december for all of Limerick to Nenagh or just the Nenagh Bypass bit?


  • Registered Users Posts: 83 ✭✭blackwarrior


    My biggest concern re the Limerick/Nenagh section is still the short piece close to Herbert's pub in Ahane.

    Last time I looked, they were re-doing foundations from scratch. Looks like a big problem to my non technical eyes.
    ki wrote: »
    In the Nenagh Guardian



    The National Roads Authority has confirmed that it is about to open the first section of the Nenagh-Limerick stretch of the new M7 motorway.
    In a significant development for the project the NRA is upgrading the existing N7 Nenagh bypass to motorway standard.

    Read More

    http://www.nenaghguardian.ie/news-detail.php?article=QJD4KK
    I drive this road every day and BOY do I want it to open!

    But I believe a partial opening of a 120km/hr stretch ending in a 60km/hr gate at either end would be really dangerous and not safe.

    I'm prepared to wait a couple of months more to see a safe, complete Limerick-Nenagh motorway open.


  • Registered Users Posts: 91 ✭✭clon


    for the whole scheme to open Limerick to nenagh by mid dec. 2009


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    tech2 wrote: »
    Lining has been started on the eastbound carriageway below the R504 overbridge

    DSC02608.jpg

    Nice rockwork - Looks likes the seating arrangements at Deathrace 2000! :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 25,234 ✭✭✭✭Sponge Bob


    That bog at the Limerick end looks heaved and buckled in the Tech2s photos a few pages back ...like the piles were not down to bedrock :eek: .

    DSC02580.jpg

    Can anyone get near it this weekend ??


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Next time take a little detour :D That looks wide open for a bit of a photo-drive.

    I will, I might go straight on over the rossbrien interchange and take a few snaps of the new road next time :D
    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Nice rockwork - Looks likes the seating arrangements at Deathrace 2000! :D

    Yeah it looks like that, I must say it's impressive but could have been cut a bit better not quite as good as the one on the M8.
    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    That bog at the Limerick end looks heaved and buckled in the Tech2s photos a few pages back ...like the piles were not down to bedrock :eek: .

    Can anyone get near it this weekend ??

    I cant this weekend but it would be good to keep tabs on this part, after all the rest of the scheme will be wrapped up very soon. Maybe Berty might have a look at it?


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement