Femme_Fatale wrote: » Giving cash is grand - it's what I always give. I think people are just objecting to the notion that a person is a freeloader or tight if they don't give a certain amount, when it's often simply the case that they can't afford it. And this should not be an issue to any bride/groom, seeing as guests should ideally be people they want to have there, rather than bodies to reimburse the costs of the wedding - which the bride/groom choose to have. I have no doubt that most people would like to be as generous as they can afford to be, and that is plenty.
WikiHow wrote: » P....they have to pay for it some way i dont think the hotel would accept 40 George foremans or 20 kettles and 19 ironing boards as payment, at the end of the day we have to be practical about it...
April O Neill II wrote: » Well no, couples tend to pay for the party they are hosting and inviting people to with money. Can't afford it without gifts? Don't do it. As said earlier, it costs 150 euro to get married in this country. That's all. Anything else is an extra.
WikiHow wrote: » The priest down my way charges 300 for the sermon alone.
WikiHow wrote: » That is fair enough but it would be better to buy a gift for 10 euro as a present than put 10 euro in cash into the envelope, we all know people don't have weddings to run a profit but it is nice to appreciate an invite and give as generous as one can.
WikiHow wrote: » People are taking this away too serious altogether, there will be a difference in opinions on how much cash is appropriate or should a gift be a better solution or a George foreman, ur being invited to a wedding it is costing the hosts over 50 euro per head, they have to pay for it some way i dont think the hotel would accept 40 George foremans or 20 kettles and 19 ironing boards as payment, at the end of the day we have to be practical about it.
Electric Sheep wrote: » In the old days (the80s) engaged couples usually saved for a deposit on a house, and the price of the wedding. They didn't get married until they had saved enough. Cash gifts were unusual. Weddings as a result were a lot smaller and simpler. That of course was before Generation Selfie had to be the center of a whole wedding weekend, not to mention stag and hen weekends.:rolleyes:
ulinbac wrote: » This crap of inviting 200+ just for money or one-upmanship like "I invited more people to my wedding than you, "I received more money than you" or "I gave a bigger present than you" is quite sad and not representative of the day.
awec wrote: » Yea, and there are plenty of couples who try and put on this amazing wedding because they want it to be one that everyone remembers - as if they're trying to outdo everyone else. Of course, everyone forgets because it turns out to be little different from virtually every other irish wedding.
pedanticpat wrote: » Well, the flat rate for registration is €200, so you're already way off.
awec wrote: » The "cover the cost of the meal" thing is pretty funny too. If you expect your guests to cover the cost of their meal then you may as well just charge them as they come in the door. The price of the meal and the value of the gift should not be linked in any way. Pay for whatever meal you can afford, and guests bring whatever gift they deem they can afford. There should be no expectation that guests cover their own costs.
krudler wrote: » One of my cousins is a hotel manager so she's been part of the planning of literally hundreds of weddings over the years and she said the same, they're nearly all identical.
Chanel Bald Sortie wrote: » Wasn't the father of the bride paying for the wedding the way it was done back in the day!
Slaygal wrote: » I'm utter shocked. I perhaps naively thought that when a couple get married they invite their family and friends along to share their wedding day. I didn't realize it was a way to make money.
Chanel Bald Sortie wrote: » You are not inviting them for the money but there is no point in pretending you aren't going to get it. It's not like wedding is the only place you make an assumption. For instance I always get some money presents around Christmas from some relatives and my birthday is a few weeks after Christmas and again I always get some money from people. Therefore in general I spend more money around Christmas and new year than I could ordinarily afford as I know I will be getting some in presents.
tomboylady wrote: » I haven't had any weddings this year thankfully. I went to two last year. I gave a £100 voucher for a homewares store to the first couple as they were just in the process of moving into a house they had bought. For the second wedding I gave €100 and a small gift (€30-ish). I went by myself so didn't feel like I needed to give more. Plus, I couldn't have afforded more at that very time. Where do we stand on gifts if you've been invited but are not attending the wedding?