Michael D Not Higgins wrote: » But "ready for Norwich" could mean starting on the bench to be rested for the CL game, which is worse as he might only get one point for being brought on for the last 10 minutes.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » true.. as I said wenger is usually very clear in his press conferences so we should have plenty of notice. If he is going for a scan there must be some concern.
Dempsey wrote: » When you spend the sort of money Arsenal did, you take every precaution with your investment. Wenger played that mind game with RVP before, I havent forgotten that one!
L.A.D wrote: » Anyone think Nani ios worth a punt with a decent run of games coming up?
roryc wrote: » Scratch that, seems like they will have pretty much a full strength squad - http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/437197/Arsenal-given-TRIPLE-boost-with-Mesut-Ozil-Santi-Cazorla-and-Wojciech-Szczesny?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+daily-express-football-news+%28Daily+Express+%3A%3A+Football+Feed%29
Swiper the fox wrote: » What situation will we be looking at when Wenger has a full deck to pick from, will we see rotation or do ye think he's going to freeze a few out, Ozil and one of Arteta and Flamini(possibly both) are certainties, there's 3 jerseys to go between lets say Arteta, Walcott, Wilshere, Santi, Ramsey and Podolski all of whom(except Ramsey) have a world cup next year, that's ignoring Ox and Rosicky, sorry about the confusing nature of this post, I'm interested in other opinions.
Thatsfootball wrote: » Is there any sort of a "template" team at the minute? I'm doing Wildcard and wondering who are best options long term, in any position?
Lemlin wrote: » The other midfielder I looked at was Michu but, believe it or not, I don't overly rate Swansea. They over achieved last season and they've alot of ordinary players IMO. I got laughed at when I said the same about Newcastle two years ago but I feel justified in that opinion now. The Swans also seem to be struggling with UEFA and league football which hits alot of teams. The new signings like Bony haven't hit the ground running either.
FutureGuy wrote: » Chico is nailed on to start every game (unlike Davies) and seems to be one of the main benefactors from the new BPS system. Swansea have very good fixtures and I think the chances of clean sheets (and bonus for Chico) are higher than a defender getting some attacking returns. So I'm not looking for Chico to score attacking points but I do expect him to get in the bonus if the Swans keep a cleanie. That's my own preference though. I can't take risks with players that may not play (I have spent 3 transfers in the last 2 weeks getting rid of non-starting players). Go with whatever player to feel is best for your team. I really like Davies, and if I could get a guarantee that he would start every game, I'd take him. However, Davies is a doubt for Sunday and Taylor is in contention for a place too.
roryc wrote: » Good points, I hadn't considered Swansea for defensive points but with £5.9m to spend on a defender I might go for one of them over Mertesacker. I'm wary of my entire team consisting of players from Top 6 teams and Swans have a good run. They've been terrible at home this year though, normally they pick up more clean sheets at home. Why do you rate Chico so much? No attacking points and only 1 BP so far. And only 3 BP's last season! Surely Rangel is a better shout if you can afford him?
roryc wrote: » Do it.
FHFC wrote: » Aw man, the kids started watching a new show on netflix this evening..... Had mind made up for Michu but can a man seriously ignore omens like that!!?
alchemist33 wrote: » Yeah, but Oasis's fixtures are terrible...