Scortho wrote: » The mileage on the nct cert is the mileage that was showing on the car when it was tested.
MetzgerMeister wrote: » ^ this is why diesels are more expensive to run that petrols :pac:
Bpmull wrote: » Anything would be cheaper than running this focus anyway. Although we've never had any hassle with any of the other diesels and my parents have had a lot. I'm actually dreading the doe tomorrow and what kind of a list they could hand me tomorrow I can think of about 10 things they could pull it up on so I'll see how strict the new rules are tomorrow. At this stage theres no point in worrying about it until I see the result tomorrow. It really makes the 54mpg just not worth it.
ba_barabus wrote: » Hence I'm looking at a petrol Mazda6 on Saturday.
imtdub wrote: » OK, I was thinking it might give you the genuine mileage of the car as it is plugged in the system.
robbie1977 wrote: » Found a decent van in Kerry.:) Collected it yesterday. I saved a good bit by buying privately so paid the €300 for the aa vehicle inspection and have to say he really was very thorough, l think it was worth it.
Bpmull wrote: » Did you go with a caddy. You'll have to stick up a few pics of it glad you found something decent all the looking pays off.
robbie1977 wrote: » Yea went with the Caddy 2011 1.6 the 102bp
Ardennes1944 wrote: » Aye, future car Ba!
Alanstrainor wrote: » Which engine is the best to go for in a Panda? 1.1, or 1.2? Talking about 04/05 gen cars. And is there anything else I should look out for? Thinking of changing the motor to something more exciting.
Alanstrainor wrote: » Which engine is the best to go for in a Panda? 1.1, or 1.2?.
ba_barabus wrote: » 1.2. It's not a bad bus with that engine.
Gary ITR wrote: » Anybody here handy on the spanners free on Sunday? Free day out in Mondello on offer
Alanstrainor wrote: » Any reason to avoid the 1.1? The 1.2 is the same that was in the Punto for years, which I presume is prone to headgasket failure, which really means that there's something funky with the cooling on them? I don't know if I'm right in saying that just have it in my head for some reason.
Supergurrier wrote: » I know where there will be a fair few spanners on sunday
ba_barabus wrote: » I think HGF is most likely down to poor maintenance on them. They aren't difficult or hard to repair as I understand it. The 1.1 is best avoided as it's simply to underpowered for the car. They're a funny thing to drive. The love to be chucked around the place and revved hard so they feel far more exciting than they are. Lots of space and comfortable too. Easy to drive and generally reliable.
dgt wrote: » Panda 100hp :cool:
Alanstrainor wrote: » That'd be my choice! But as you might have guessed it's not for me! As for the power difference, there's only 5bhp between the 2. But then again I've not driven either so I don't know how they compare. Apart from the engines in these, is there anything else I should keep in mind if I go to look at any?
Alanstrainor wrote: » Apart from the engines in these, is there anything else I should keep in mind if I go to look at any?
ba_barabus wrote: » A friend had one and the only issue he ever mentioned was ECU problems that seemed to cause a misfire. I don't recall it ever being a massive issue or him ever getting to the bottom of it. For what you pay I think they're great value.
YbFocus wrote: » 255-35-19 man Thank you if you can help me out