The Chessplayer wrote: » The new owners appear to be rolling in it so maybe we can take the hit on Carroll. How much do people think Carroll would fetch if we flogged him in the summer?
ilovelamp2000 wrote: » What ? Did you ever see Ian Rush play ?
amiable wrote: » Maybe if he scores a few goals against Chelsea at Anfield Roman might get out the cheque book again
Crazy Horse 6 wrote: » Imo we'll see him back at Newcastle in January never mind the Summer. I'd say we'll get 20m for him. Big loss but imo Kenny has already made his mind up on him. After we sell him back he'll start banging in the goals again for Newcastle it's just the way of things.
willmunny1990 wrote: » Ya never no with ye being our feeder club and all;)
DDC1990 wrote: » Doesn't the "Bigger Club" have to beat the "Feeder Club"? You are just our Elephant graveyard, where we send players who dont have the bottle to be at Liverpool anymore.Benayoun, Meireles, Torres... Some purchases
willmunny1990 wrote: » Benayoun wasn't a bad player, he wasn't given a chance IMO and he suffered that Achilles injury, ye would have Meireles back in a heart beat, he is better than the likes of Spearing, Henderson etc...Il give you the Torres one, thing is we can afford to take the hit if he fails. Elephant graveyard? Joe Cole and Glen Johnson spring to mind;)
GBX wrote: » Yes of course... did you read what I wrote? "He could turn into that style of player" ... not he is that type of player. I meant poacher :rolleyes:
amiable wrote: » In fairness Ian Rush wasn't just a poacher
mixednuts wrote: » He aint going anywhere He is with is less than a year He was bought more as a project than a player No one would pay near £15 never mind £30 million
mixednuts wrote: » No one would pay near £15 never mind £30 million
The Chessplayer wrote: » I think it's fair to say he's staying put. The question is, though, would the owners be prepared to spend big money on another new striker while Andy Carroll is still at the club. And how would it help Carroll (other than taking the spotlight off him)? A new striker would only mean even less chances for Carroll to play.
monkey9 wrote: » http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/dec/11/luis-suarez-liverpool-qpr
th3 s1aught3r wrote: » Id say the owners might take some convincing to part with a large sum to buy a striker. They have an asset they feel is worth 35m. The depreciation on that will be savage at the moment
corcaigh07 wrote: » jaysus first I'm impressed with Gary Neville on Sky and now Neil Warnock about Suarez. What the hell is goin on????!!!
magma69 wrote: » I wouldn't blame the owners for not giving Kenny the funds for another big signing. 3 out of 4 have failed to impress thus far.
ilovelamp2000 wrote: » Feel free to rub my nose in it when Carroll turns into a pacy, instinctive finisher and all round club legend
Kenny Dalglish has reiterated his unwavering belief that Liverpool's strikeforce are on the verge of a goal-fest. The Reds once again created a raft of chances at the weekend but found QPR stopper Radek Cerny in inspired form during the 1-0 victory over Neil Warnock's men. Dalglish was delighted with the overall performance of his charges and is confident they are still moving in the right direction. "We did miss some chances, yes, but the goalkeeper saved a lot of them too," said Dalglish. "Do I feel the need to go out and do something about that? Aye, whichever side comes along here next, we'll ask them to come without a 'keeper. That's the best way to do it, isn't it? "Irrespective of what I say, it's not going to stop speculation we are going out in January to sign Joe Bloggs up front, or whoever. I don't need to say anything. "For us it was a fantastic team performance. We are quite happy. "I trust the players implicitly when it comes to scoring, implicitly. "They continued to get in there on goal, and even with the 'keeper having a good day, they didn't drop their heads. They must be enjoying what they are doing, to continue playing like that, and creating chances like that. "One day, creating chances like that, we are going to get a load...or we are going to be garbage, and win 1-0. And I think that will do us." He added: "I think some of the football we played in the first half was brilliant, and we won't change our beliefs or the way we play. "That's why we brought the players here in the first place, and we will stick to those principles. "Our performance was fantastic, and the only thing missing was the goals that confirm that. "If you look at home performances they have been fantastic, look at points...maybe not. There is not a game we have played here that we couldn't have won, we shouldn't have won. "The goalkeepers that have come here have done very well for their sides...I'm saying that again. Performance wise, we don't have any problem whatsoever, goals - yeah, we'd love more, and we'll get more."
magma69 wrote: » My hatred of him has seriously dwindled since he became a pundit. Neville talks quite a lot of sense. It's a tad disappointing because I really enjoyed hating him.
Chucky the tree wrote: » So because he scored 5 goals in 37 appearances 5 years ago when he was 19 we shouldn't spend money on him now despite him having scored 60 goals in 115 appearances since then?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w1.vanillicon.com/v2/11f397efbb618f280f346771bb290fe0.svg)
