Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Jeffrey Epstein arrested on sex trafficking charges

Options
1525354555658»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,875 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    no way she gives up her favourite child

    Lizzie won't be around for ever.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Treppen


    People are thinking it'll be the trial of the century with all the Elites implicated and publicly shamed.

    In actuality it'll all hinge on one person's word against another. Case closed, problem solved, tie it up in legal (yet again).

    That's why she didn't need to abscond. She waited it out , got all the ducks in a row, gave assurances to those that wanted them and got prepped by her legal team.

    It'll all be a damp squib for the public gallery, with just some salacious headlines for the tabloids.

    I mean, if there's one person you want to control how a story plays out, Robert Maxwell's daughter is about as good as you'll ever get.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,239 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Treppen wrote: »
    People are thinking it'll be the trial of the century with all the Elites implicated and publicly shamed.

    Anyone that's thinking this is absolutely deluded.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,653 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Zebra3 wrote: »
    Lizzie won't be around for ever.


    yeah had wondered about this, good chance the queen dies in the next couple of years and Andrew might not get the same favourable treatment off a new King Charles as he does off his mother.

    For brothers the two of them are complete opposites with Charles being the old fogey conservationist and Andrew the party playboy. I doubt they even get on and AFAIK its been a long long time since the two of them were even photographed together as brothers. Id imagine in private Charles is actual fuming with Andrew for dragging the royal family through the mud like this. He is the successor to the crown so he will be ultimately inheriting this mess.


  • Registered Users Posts: 86,346 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1


    no way she gives up her favourite child

    Her dog :D


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Treppen


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    yeah had wondered about this, good chance the queen dies in the next couple of years and Andrew might not get the same favourable treatment off a new King Charles as he does off his mother.

    For brothers the two of them are complete opposites with Charles being the old fogey conservationist and Andrew the party playboy. I doubt they even get on and AFAIK its been a long long time since the two of them were even photographed together as brothers. Id imagine in private Charles is actual fuming with Andrew for dragging the royal family through the mud like this. He is the successor to the crown so he will be ultimately inheriting this mess.

    Although there is the association between Charles and Jimmy Saville and Peter Ball and his favourite uncle Mountbatten. That was all kept fairly under wraps.

    For Andy I think it was the Shady dealings he undertook in his diplomatic role that will save his ass . Epstein was a master of hiding money for individuals and organisations and I've no doubt Andy was party to it. Stephen Hoffenburg, Epstein's first big business partner, did an interview last week on a Spotify podcast. Their sexual misdeeds are actually helping all of them because it distracts from the other shady dealings.

    Talk of a secret dead man's switch is funny in a way because it's right in front of all our eyes for the last 2 years... The flight logs and Epstein's black book. Nobody on it has been quizzed about their connections.


  • Registered Users Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko


    A federal judge on Thursday agreed with Ghislaine Maxwell’s request to keep certain details in the criminal case against her secret — finding that information would be too “sensational and impure” to reveal to the public.

    US District Judge Alison J. Nathan issued a ruling on redactions that Maxwell had asked for regarding transcripts the government filed under seal last month.

    “Those portions of the transcript, which were redacted in the civil matter, concern privacy interests and their disclosure would merely serve to cater to a ‘craving for that which is sensational and impure,’” Nathan wrote in the order.

    https://nypost.com/2021/03/18/judge-says-ghislaine-maxwell-case-details-too-sensational-and-impure-for-public/


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    biko wrote: »

    What insane logic is this? Transparency will somehow lead us away from the truth?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,601 ✭✭✭Treppen


    After watching the college admission scandal documentary on Netflix I wonder about all Epstein's dealings with universities and money. The guy has his paws in colleges/academics and philanthropic donations flowed through him like a running tap.

    Himself, Andy and Gislane's pervy tendancies are really serving them well to throw up mud.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,095 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    Tell me you’ve been to Epstein’s Island without telling you’ve been to Epstein’s Island

    https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/1800698597488435711

    edit can't make it a hyperlink for some reason.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement