It does the heart good to see some of these folks getting hauled before the courts.
Utterly bonkers defense from this lad
Anyone know of others?
Threadbans
Tonesjones
brenbrady
Hahahaha, play stupid games win stupid prizes.
Anti-vax conspiracy theorists, who claim the Covid-19 vaccine is a “bioweapon” inserting “nanochips” into recipients, are to be hit with a legal bill for tens of thousands of euro by a High Court judge to discourage them from continuing their “unmeritorious and scandalous” lawsuit against the State.
Among the “baseless allegations” made in the lawsuit taken by Sharon Browne, David Egan and Emmanual Lavery are that the HSE was responsible for “mass killing” comparable to Nazi Germany and that the vaccine was “part of a plan by Bill Gates to depopulate the world”.
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
That.is.AWESOME hahaha
Unbelievably it gets worse, these 3 muppets want to have bodies exhumed, and not just a few LMAO
The applicants also sought orders seeking the mass disinterment of the bodies of all vaccinated persons under 80 years of age who died suddenly in the last two and a half years so that they could undergo a specific type of autopsy.
Its more concerning what the feck those loopers have taken rather than any vaccine.
Ghoul sued
THE MOTHER OF a Cavan teenager who died by suicide is suing former journalist and anti-vaccine campaigner Gemma O’Doherty for the “unauthorised and misappropriate use” of her son’s image in an article trying to link sudden deaths to Covid-19 vaccines.
hopefully o'doherty is cleaned out, what an absolutely disgusting and shameful thing for her to do.
she should be ashamed of herself, but you know she won't be at all even though she should, most definitely be.
Ontario doctor struck off for ivermectin and other anti vax nonsense
Looks like all the money Tracey O'Mahoney raised to take a court case isn't anywhere to be seen.
180k raised on a gofundme and nothing
Money. Let's be honest a lot of this was just pure grifting.
Any chance of the people directly responsible for the failed covid policies that have resulted in excess deaths in this country pretty much every month for over a year facing consequences?
Our media is obsessed with BoJo and Co. in the UK but not a peep about our Government's response and actions oddly enough. Terms of reference for an inquiry here have yet to be even agreed.
All governments had to take decisions during the pandemic, not sure we did anything dramatically different that warrants prosecution.
I'd settle for consequences of those decisions, doesn't necessarily need to be prosecution. You know, like not being able to swan off into a cushy private sector job, leaving a trail of destruction behind them.
There were imminent scientists and medical people who did warn of the impact covid restrictions would have, and they were roundly ridiculed or hounded out of there jobs, so government can't just conveniently pretend there were no counter arguments to the polices that were put in place.
Okay, what is an example of a decision that warrants consequences?
the government never stated or argued that there weren't counter arguments, it's that the counter arguments to the vital public health measures just didn't cut the mustard when examined thurily, and would have failed to allow the aims to be met.
Moving vulnerable, elderly patients out of hospitals and into nursing homes without any testing or disease control measures, curtailing screenings for other diseases and having some of the longest school closures in all of Europe.
How does it relate to the the thread topic though
For the first point it could be argued that hospitals were under pressure
For the second point, we were only slightly above the OECD average in terms of school closures
It's easy with hindsight to pick anything apart, but in terms of punitive actions against individuals during the pandemic, we didn't do anything dramatically different from other countries.
Well part of the title of the thread is anti-science folks facing consequences and I'd consider a lot of the decisions taken by health authorities to be anti-scientific. Sure didn't Tony Holohan allegedly say that they'd "do the science later".
Don't know why people on this thread are so concerned about minnows facing consequences whilst seemingly ignoring those either directly or indirectly responsible for thousands of excess deaths.
You are making statements of facts about responsibility for excess deaths on the basis of absolutely zero evidence. And you talk of "anti science" ???
There's already a thread here for the proposed inquiry you mentioned earlier, which also debunks some of the misinformation and dubious claims made about excess deaths.
https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058266294/reflection-on-the-pandemic-questions-about-the-authorities-response#latest
What’s an imminent scientist? One who’s coming whether you’re ready or not?
This looks like conspiracy nonsense.
Here in the UK, the government handed billions to their cronies, did dirty deals on PPE, ignored the science and danced while tens of thousands of people were dying. They'll never, ever be held accountable for what they did.
If you're looking at anti science decisions then I would suggest the most serious one was made by multiple governments where they denied that masks were necessary just because they couldn't supply them to the public.
I don't mind so much making a bad decision in hindsight but blatantly lying for political purposes does annoy me.
Excellent point!
Enlighten us so for the reasons for excess deaths. Because last year it was because of a couple of weeks of hot weather. And yet excess deaths continued. Then it was because of cold weather. And still excess deaths have continued. Are we back to warm weather again?
Or is it the HSE cyber attack delaying reports of deaths? Except other countries that followed similar covid policies are experiencing excess deaths also. Maybe those countries are using the HSE's marvelous IT systems too?
Already enlightened ie discussed in detail on the correct thread, where your misinformation is already debunked:
Please take discussion of the Government's reactions/non-reactions to the relevant thread:
They aren't necessary - masks are nonsense and in no way beneficial. The evidence is perfectly clear.
Show the evidence please.
Everyone got Covid.
So to support a claim made without evidence (which contradicts the scientific consensus) ... you make another claim without evidence, which even if true ( and there is no reason to believe it is) wouldnt prove the original claim.
Come back to us when you have some evidence or logic.
Look at your immediate circle, I bet nearly everyone had covid. And if they don't have a documented infection they likely 'had it' without knowing. There was a seroprevalence study done in UCC, they had half the people with a documented infection and half without, who didn't think they had had it and I think the seroprevalence was >90%
So masks didn't make a blind bit of difference, everyone was exposed multiple times, regardless.
Masks were known to not make a difference for respiratory bugs before covid. They only came in for the government to be seen to do something, to provide a visual aid and to satisfy the fear nuts.
Logical enough?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/62877c35768f143f69acd7bb6cd43f3c.svg)
