FileNotFound wrote: » But we don't count 1 dose as vaccinated. Whats the data after 2 doses? Serious question.
Turtwig wrote: » Explain
Turtwig wrote: » Tony is correct. Back in January 4 weeks after your first dose of Pfizer or AZ the vaccines reduced your risk of infection by 90%. Transmission was reduced by about 50%. With Delta four weeks after your first dose the risk of infection is reduced by less than 50%. Why are people retconning this? The vaccines still prevent severe disease. That doesn't mean we haven't lost significant ground - we have. The vaccines prevented infection against the original wildtype and alpha. This is no longer the case with Delta, at least in the same timeframe. Suggesting we haven't lost ground is bizarre.
TonyMaloney wrote: » If you recall, the UK changed their entire vaccine rollout plan, prioritising more of the population getting a first dose quickly rather than getting people fully vaxed. Such was the strength of the efficacy against alpha after one dose
hmmm wrote: » The point is that previous calculations for when it was safe to reopen were based in large part on single doses lowering spread considerably. Those figures don't look to be as good with Delta, so the maths have changed. Some countries (e.g. the UK) went for a first-dose strategy which was working very well against the earlier variants. It's not the end of the world, it's changed circumstances and as far as I'm concerned only a timing issue - the vaccines (when fully vaccinated) are providing excellent protection.
robinph wrote: » People who have been vaccinated are in the vast, vast majority not ending up in hospitals, not getting ill with covid and hopefully also not being sources of further infections if they do happen to pick it up from someone else. Most cases are in the younger unvaccinated population, they are not ending up in hospital in the same rate that older ages would, they are not dying from covid.
Turtwig wrote: » I showed how the vaccines response is different after one dose. Tony is getting ridiculed for his claim is that there's ground lost. We can no longer get the exceptional results we were getting after one dose and two doses. Back in January a single dosing strategy was 90% effective after four weeks Two weeks after two doses of AZ is about 60% effective at preventing infection. (Down from 70%+) Two weeks after two doses of PB is about 80% effective at preventing infection. (Down from 90%+) Ground has been lost.
B.A._Baracus wrote: » Only my opinion, for what it's worth (which is nothing ) But I see another lockdown over the horizon. Probably September.
Micky 32 wrote: » Something to remind ourselves of before clicking on clickbait articles from rags or if you’re thinking of hiding under the bed: “There has been no recommendation from NPHET to roll back on any of the Covid-19 restrictions which have been eased so far, Dr Holohan said. He said the recommendation to limit indoor dining to those who are vaccinated when they reopen allows for the "further opening of society, albeit focused on people who are vaccinated". Dr Holohan said it was "probably not" likely that new restrictions would be introduced later in the year to combat the Delta variant of Covid-19, but didn't rule it out.“”
Turtwig wrote: » What has this to do with the fact that the vaccines are less effective at preventing delta infection compared the original virus and alpha? I fully acknowledge they're still effective at preventing hospitalisation and death. I've even made posts telling people who were annoyed they got AZ before anyone else was vaccinated that they still got excellent vaccine that prevented severe illness from delta after the first dose All of this does not change the fact that the vaccines are now less effective at preventing infections. We have lost ground and that makes things harder than they would otherwise have been. The ridicule Tony got was disproportionate and unwarranted.
jakiah wrote: » Wait, what? NPHET are predicting 2000 deaths in three months as their worst case, how would we not need restrictions then? Or does that mean the 'worst case' wont happen? Why publish it then?
Turtwig wrote: » I showed how the vaccines response is different after one dose. Tony is getting ridiculed for his claim is that there's ground lost. We can no longer get the exceptional results we were getting after one dose and two doses. Back in January a single dosing strategy was 90% effective after four weeksTwo weeks after two doses of AZ is about 60% effective at preventing infection. (Down from 70%+) Two weeks after two doses of PB is about 80% effective at preventing infection. (Down from 90%+) Ground has been lost.
robinph wrote: » So 96% and 92% effective against the Delta variant isn't good enough for you?
AdamD wrote: » These figures aren't correct though?
TefalBrain wrote: » Little or no increase in UK hospitalizations since this variant started.https://www.statista.com/statistics/1190335/covid-19-daily-hospitalizations-in-the-uk/ Delta is a wet fart
stephenjmcd wrote: » "But they did significantly reduce transmission, and we based a lot of our plans around that fact. That advantage has been lost to delta"
Turtwig wrote: » If you had a vaccine that prevents infection . Then it's much harder for the virus to transmit onwards. The virus is unlikely to replicate within the vaccinated individual for long. The covid vaccines provided this protection against the wildtype and alpha after one dose. Now, after both one and two doses the vaccines have lost ground in preventing symptomatic infection from delta. The virus can replicate within someone for much longer. That impacts transmissibility. The vaccines, especially two doses, should still reduce transmissibility. Just not as effectively as before. In particular one dose that was really effective against onwards transmission should now be considerably weaker. Two doses, less so.Given delta is still "new" to the UK it'll be a few weeks before transmissibility reduction by vaccines can be quantified.