xhomelezz wrote: » Do you see it on pics? I can't. But looking at them on the phone.
dobman88 wrote: » I'm also looking on a phone and can see it. Picture 6, zoom in towards the wheel and its plainly obvious. Also, in the ad he says it will be a classic in 3 and a half years. Not sure why he would bother mentioning it. Tbh, I just don't like the ad, cant quite put my finger on why, but I wouldn't even bother with it because I dont like it.
dobman88 wrote: » Also, in the ad he says it will be a classic in 3 and a half years. Not sure why he would bother mentioning it.
Turbolounge wrote: » Cheap(er) insurance as it's 20 years old
dobman88 wrote: » Yeah, I understand that. If it was 20 this year, I'd see the relevance. Just don't get why you'd mention it when its 3 years away from being valid. Trying too hard to sell it which makes me think that there are issues.
bazz26 wrote: » It's no Chevy Cruze or SsangYong Rexton for sure.
johndaman66 wrote: » I'd agree that them Mondeo's were far from the worst cars on the road at the time. No doubt there was better than them but they were far from the worst. If you want to look at the same class alone, the P12 Primera, Laguna II or Vectra C wouldn't have being a patch on it.
AMKC wrote: » I would have the Chevrolet Cruze over a Mondeo MK3 anyday. Your right the Laguna II made the MK III mondeo look old. The Laguna II not only looked better but was technacly far more advanced than that Mondeo as well and a much nicer place to be inside than the Mondeo. Yes ok the Laguna II could have done with been built better but there is still a few around I think half of ye Mondeo Lovers in here must be farmers because that Mondeo really was a farm car.
RandomViewer wrote: » The Mondeo 3 brought back the people who had owned Sierras and mk5 Cortinas, square design, decent ground clearance, bumpers that could take a bump without cracking like an egg,
bazz26 wrote: » Ah would you stop.
AMKC wrote: » I would have the Chevrolet Cruze over a Mondeo MK3 anyday.
DARK-KNIGHT wrote: » Anyone see a decent Laguna between 08 and 11 for sale?
CoBo55 wrote: » He'd give an Aspro a headache:mad:
yamaha4life wrote: » I don't know about that but i owned a 02 1.8 petrol one for a while, i bought it off its first owner a mechanic that worked at abernathys. It had 92,000 miles. Was just after getting new piston rings according to the service history. The swirl flaps were removed by the previous owner because of a known fault. it was nice to drive surprisingly economical but my god it continually fell apart, sticky brake calipers, bushings, fuel pump, alarm + immobiliser issues. List goes on but when the timing chain started to rattle that was it got rid. The diesel version much better performance wise but id struggle to buy one even as a stop gap!
TommyGun2017 wrote: » Despite what I've read about them reliability wise, I cant help like this 407 priced at €975 New NCT until 5/22 More reliable 2.0hdi Cheap tax at €400 Heated leather, cruise. Think these high spec UK ones came with sat nav and xenons too. Boot looks like its had a knock? Anyway, a nice yoke to cruise along at 120km/hhttps://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/peugeot-407/27985976?campaign=14
siblers wrote: » I drove two different 2litre 407s, lovely to drive and fairly rapid but as reliable as an Insignia.Engine died on one and the other had emissions issues and couldn't pass the NCT. Its a pity they weren't a bit more reliable as they're a lovely car I never took to the 508s, quite ugly compared to the 407
DARK-KNIGHT wrote: » Are the 508s reliable though?
Midnight_EG wrote: » They are as long as you don't drive them
AMKC wrote: » Yes very. Bulls-hit. They are a very reliable well built car.
KevRossi wrote: » A pair of big Volvo estates. Both diesel. , just far away.
26000 Elephants wrote: » Ones petrol. The blue one would be the pick of them, if you dont mind the tax. Just make sure it wasnt towing a horse box, Volvo autos are work shy. More of an issue on later XC models, but worth a check all the same. Otherwise a fantastic car for the money.
