Deleted User wrote: » You're using different vocabulary to what the quoted piece used, with obviously different connotations. It emerged in China, which is obvious. The post you quoted referred to where it originated.
gozunda wrote: » But nooooo - it couldn't possibly have escaped from the lab or anything similar.
At this stage any evidence of where this virus actually came from is well and truely buried. We may as well demand that proof of God be presented.
DaSilva wrote: » Unintentional, I don't want to get into a debate on semantics where these things probably have very specific technical meanings. What I was trying to say is that I think the first case of sars-cov-2 human infection in the world most likely happened in China.
Deleted User wrote: » You introduced a different word and led with that different meaning as a basis for your whole post. I wouldn't consider that unintentional, and the differences in meaning are hardly technical. I honestly don't know where the first case happened. There are many claims of covid happening outside before it 'emerged' in Wuhan. I suspect it could easily have happened in India, or any number of nearby countries and been transmitted across borders into China. Or it did, indeed, start in China. I simply don't know, and I haven't seen any definitive evidence to prove it, one way or another. And I see no value in assuming that it did. It's being used as a stick to beat China with, and I see serious implications arising as a result of that. Personally, I don't consider it sensible to play the blame game on this.
DaSilva wrote: » It wasn't intentional, I am not trying to play semantics, I tried to clarify what I meant to end that discussion, but again you insist on having some argument when there needn't be any. If you want, you can define all the words and their meanings and I can tell you which one I intended to use if my previous clarification wasn't enough. .
[Deleted User] wrote: » Who said it was impossible? i certainly didn't. However, I did say that you have zero evidence (beyond opinion pieces) to support your oft repeated idea that it did. Hence it remains in the conspiracy theory category,..Well, that's convenient, since it allows you to make dramatic statements to your hearts content. The origin of most viruses were determined after the fact. After the spread, and the effects. There will be ways to determine where it came from.. but it will likely take decades for that to happen, just as it did with other viruses. You want to take the easiest option, and jump to conclusions.
[Deleted User] wrote: » ... I simply don't know, and I haven't seen any definitive evidence to prove it, one way or another. And I see no value in assuming that it did. It's being used as a stick to beat China with, and I see serious implications arising as a result of that. Personally, I don't consider it sensible to play the blame game on this.
Deleted User wrote: » ...I suspect it could easily have happened in India, or any number of nearby countries and been transmitted across borders into China. Or it did, indeed, start in China. I simply don't know, and I haven't seen any definitive evidence to prove it, ....
The virus was first confirmed to have spread to Italy on 31 January 2020, when two Chinese tourists in Rome tested positive for the virus.[1] One week later an Italian man repatriated back to Italy from the city of Wuhan, China, was hospitalised and confirmed as the third case in Italy
The first cases of COVID-19 in India were reported in the towns of Thrissur, Alappuzha and Kasargod, all in the state of Kerala, among three Indian medical students who had returned from Wuhan.
On January 19, 2020, a 35-year-old man presented to an urgent care clinic in Snohomish County, Washington, with a 4-day history of cough and subjective fever. On checking into the clinic, the patient put on a mask in the waiting room. After waiting approximately 20 minutes, he was taken into an examination room and underwent evaluation by a provider. He disclosed that he had returned to Washington State on January 15 after traveling to visit family in Wuhan, China.
gozunda wrote: » My "oft repeated idea it did" I think you mixing me up with all the other posters here who have been pointing out the nativity of that type of POV over the last few pages
And indeed there's certaintly more than one scientist/ expert and who have pointed to the likleyhood of the Cov-2 virus originating in Wuhan as highly likley and why. But I digress sure personal bias outweighs all that and them are just "opinion pieces" ...
And it remains leaving aside the fact that any proof has been well and truely buried does not negate the fact that the The Wuhan Institute of Virology was working on these very viruses just prior to this outbreak in Wuhan
Or that the Chinese have absolutely no interest in bioweapon development or similar? Or the chances of the rest of the world been told the truth is practically nil? What we do know is that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Unfortunately China have no interest in admiting to anything. If they did - that would be a first.
Flinty997 wrote: » Just coincidence probably. It most likely spontaneously occurred somewhere like the US, traveled across half the world to Wuhan without infecting anyone, and then was just Chinese diligence that caused it to be identified there and missed by every other country..., or frozen salmon.
It would be useful to know, the source, to prevent it re-occurring again. But we will never know. China's fine anyway. No need to worry.
gozunda wrote: » Did you mean that the underlined bit to come across as a threat from China? And that will be retaliation or worse where such ideas are expressed? Very interesting if so - Whatever SARs-CoV-2 is - its not a game. Not to the rest of the world anyway.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Remember the public reaction to Chinese people living in Western countries regarding covid. The hostility that was directed against them. Not China. Individuals that have no control or involvement over how China behaves as a nation. That's what I mean by a threat. The virus itself is not a game. The blaming of others is most definitely a game, and one that is being used to push attention away from the ineptitude of western governments , and focus it elsewhere.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Considering the range of airtravel and the lack of testing of passengers at the time, it's possible. I don't know how likely it is.. although, I imagine my original suggestion that it crossed China's border from another neighboring country is more likely. .....
gozunda wrote: » There is no "blaming" of ordinary Chinese people being advocated here.
What is being referred to is the general idea that the Chinese state authorities must be believed without question.
We've already seen how the WHO went along with that idea and initially refused to accept any other version than the Chinese state one that there was no P2P transmission of SARs-CoV-2. That and whilst China locked itself down internally with gulag like efficiency insisting that there was absolutely no need to restrictions on international flights from China. And we know how that went.
And no it's not a competition of which western country is most 'inept' - its standing up and at least acknowledging from what is known the probability is high that the virus likley originated in China. Unfortunately that's unlikely ever to happen. Why? Because even on the most basic level Chinese authorities simply don't like losing face ...
[Deleted User] wrote: » Nope. I tend to remember posters on a thread. Now, I could be wrong, but I'm pretty certain that you've popped into the thread a variety of times to post the Wuhan lab conspiracy theory.
[Deleted User] wrote: » They're opinion pieces because they have no evidence to back up their statements. I've seen the articles referenced by posters both on this thread, and other threads which talked about China being directly responsible for the virus.
[Deleted User] wrote: » But sure, provide the thread with some concrete evidence (nope, not a reason to dump a pile of opinions from "experts"). I'd love to see it. Otherwise, you're still promoting a conspiracy theory. Two facts mentioned, neither of which are facts. They're assumptions based on... more opinion pieces, that haven't been proven to be true. I'm sure that they are interested in such research.. since the US remains the biggest producer and stockpile of such weapons in the world, and China will interest itself in such things, either for defensive or offensive purposes.As for being told the truth, it's possible that they have. Just as it's possible they haven't. The simple truth is that these assumptions are based on past behavior by China, as opposed to actual evidence to prove it. Is China untrustworthy? Definitely. Is that proof, in itself? Nope. Except they have admitted blame on a range of issues in the past.. when it suited their purposes to do so. I'm not suggesting they're angels. Nothing in any of my posts seeks to make such a claim. At the same time though, I find a lot of the attitudes displayed online regarding China, stem more about a belief that they're lying, than any actual evidence that they are.
Flinty997 wrote: » It's obviously western propaganda to create outbreaks across the entire globe, all four corners and make it look like they all came from China. Certainly not impossible. Especially probably that all China's neighbour did this, simultaneously.
gozunda wrote: » Do you Go? Really Go check the thread before throwing accusations there boyo.
Even the most cursory search will give detailed analysis of scientists and experts as to why Wuhan is the likley site for the origin of this virus. Look it up if you're not happy with the 'articles' others have posted. You may just learn something.
That you dismiss everything as verisimilitude and continously defend Chinas stance that apparently everyone else is to blame eg "the ineptitude of western governments" without any backup or rationale is frankly downright odd at best ..
Ah yes "eveything" is a conspiracy theory and likly to smear the good name of China. :rolleyes:
It doesn't wash ...
[Deleted User] wrote: » Okay. My mistake. Can you ever forgive me?
[Deleted User] wrote: » As I said, opinion pieces by experts. Are still opinion pieces. No solid evidence. Hardly. I asked for evidence as opposed to opinion pieces. That's hardly unreasonable. We live in a world driven by agendas, and bias is extremely common throughout the world... so, yeah, I'd prefer some solid evidence. As for defending China's stance... where have I done that? The reference to western ineptitude is not a "one or the other" scenario. Both can be an issue. China's behavior was abysmal, and western nations were inept. And that's part of the problem really. Those who want to condemn China, tend to want to ignore or dismiss the mistakes done by western governments. Better to focus entirely on one target. Deflection.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Meh. You're not paying attention to what I've written about China.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Fine. It doesn't wash. Neither does your posting either. You're annoyed that I made a mistake in claiming that you'd posted about the conspiracy theory... grand. My mistake. However, you've since decided to go running around throwing crap all over the place, making your own inaccurate statements about what I supposedly believe. You believe the possibility of something being true is enough to warrant complete acceptance. I don't.
[Deleted User] wrote: » I honestly don't care. Until I see some evidence that covid originated in China, or was created in China... I will continue to simply believe it was first detected there. That's it. Detection.
gozunda wrote: » ...Nope. You strangely just keep repeating the same stuff. Experts provide expert opinions. Strange that you just dismiss them out of hand so. No? ....
gozunda wrote: » My posting is in reply to your claims which simply dont stand up to scrutiny imho.
I think we can leave it there.
[Deleted User] wrote: » ...And that's part of the problem really. Those who want to condemn China, tend to want to ignore or dismiss the mistakes done by western governments. Better to focus entirely on one target. Deflection. ..
Flinty997 wrote: » The subject of the thread is China. Not anything else. Wanted to focus on that is not deflection. However wanting to talk about anything other than the topic title certainly is.
Deleted User wrote: » The focus is on how China is getting on, and what interacts with China has relevance. But sure, I'll stop mentioning other countries, if you do the same.
DaSilva wrote: » Some of America's top virologists have published an open letter in Science recommending further investigation of the origins of the virus and to take the lab leak hypothesis seriouslyhttps://science.sciencemag.org/content/372/6543/694.1