[Deleted User] wrote: » ...... that they have the ability to eradicate a virus. ...
Flinty997 wrote: » Well if it's possible to eradicate the virus (we were told on this thread it wasn't but now it is) and their controls work, (though you seem to be suggesting they aren't perfect) then there is no problem.
Flinty997 wrote: » Rather the opposite, I'm accepting what people are saying at face value. I'm just pointing out its often contradictory. I'm only going by whats posted in this thread.
Flinty997 wrote: » Only flaw in that, is that they don't consider asymptomatic carriers as positive cases or as infectious, they don't count them in their stats. They are still getting new cases and breakouts. Only now they are (conveniently) only coming from external sources Which shouldn't be possible due the strict border controls and litany of other measures you've listed. So how's China doing. Great.
caoty wrote: » this is the reason why the Chinese, in millions, could move freely over the May holiday season without much fear.
caoty wrote: » .... The other possibility is that domestic residents are infected by contacting personnel and/or goods coming into China. (This actually was indeed the cause of one of the mini outbreaks in China last year) .....
caoty wrote: » Whether asymptomatic carriers are counted as infected cases or not is a matter of statistical standard which does not change the state of the pandemic/infection on the ground a bit! The new cases in China at this stage come from two sources: 1 International travellers who test positive(imported). They are counted towards China's new cases daily. These people are treated if necessary and quarantined. 2. Domestic cases. There are two possibilities. The first is domestic residents who are asymptomatic carriers but have somehow escaped the tracing and testing net. Recovered cases can turn positive too. The existence of asymptomatic carriers are a matter of reality to continue until the pandemic is over. But they are not that much dangerous if correct measures(above) are taken. .....
thebaz wrote: » I'm assuming nothing , I merly asked the question how the virus originated ?? It has not definitvly been proven to have started in a wet market, it could have been an accident - I dont believe the Chinese goverment intentionally caused the pandemic, but I would like some answers on how it started - not going to get that answer here I know.
archer22 wrote: » And I am struggling here with crap 'broadband' to put up these simple short posts, inspite of hundreds of millions of taxpayers money being paid out on some "national broadband scheme" :rolleyes:
"if the mountain won't come to Muhammad, then Muhammad must go to the mountain”
Flinty997 wrote: » China has a long history of such feats. In WWII they built lots of airfields and runways for B29 bombers by hand, or their famous Treasure ships in the 15th? Century.
clever user name wrote: » Hundreds of millions. Everyone and their mom went somewhere during the holiday. I went to Chongqing and it was an absolute s**t show, so many damn people. But aside from the carnage of that many people travelling, as you mentioned, the reason so many people did it was because it is safe to do so. Life is back to normal here, and has been for quite some time now.
snotboogie wrote: » How is life back to normal if the other poster living in China is embarrassed to see foreigners outdoors without masks?
thebaz wrote: » or you could see it as a way of not blaming the Chinese people for accusations of negligense or misinformation, but the CCP have questions to answer, given damage caused to rest of world. How virus originated is a legitimate and important question, since we dont want it to happen again.
Flinty997 wrote: » Do you mean the salmon. If not what specifically...
caoty wrote: » Yes, the "salmon" story is one of them. Contaminated imported goods are one source of infection...
....On 27 February, the first case on the island of Ireland was announced—a woman from Belfast who had travelled from Northern Italy through Dublin Airport.[48] Two days later, on 29 February, the first confirmed case in the Republic of Ireland was announced involving a male student from the east of the country, who had arrived there from Northern Italy....
thebaz wrote: » I'm assuming nothing , I merly asked the question how the virus originated ?? ...
thebaz wrote: » I'm assuming nothing , I merly asked the question how the virus originated ?? It has not definitely been proven to have started in a wet market, it could have been an accident - I dont believe the Chinese goverment intentionally caused the pandemic, but I would like some answers on how it started - not going to get that answer here I know.
caoty wrote: » "The Spanish Flu did not “originate in Spain". It was brought to Europe by the US forces during WWI and ravaged the trenches as the authorities ducked it under the carpet in order to keep the war going. Spain ended up being the first country hit and started tracking diseases. And so the others acted as if the origin were Spain and they were just learning about this thing. It got to Spain from France months after the Americans had brought it to France from their country. The Americans, the French, the British and the Germans all had soldiers falling like flies in silence by the time Spain started to publish honest data. Their press dubbed it “the Spanish Flu", transversally, central powers and allies, putting aside their mutual murder to pretend the flue had just popped up in Spain. And if Spain had kept the lie going, it would have been named after the first country doing honest reporting.Viruses originate by random mutations without care for flags, people, place or anything non-biological. "
DaSilva wrote: » Of course its possible it emerged somewhere else, but given the current evidence it most likely emerged somewhere in China.
[Deleted User] wrote: » You're using different vocabulary to what the quoted piece used, with obviously different connotations. It emerged in China, which is obvious. The post you quoted referred to where it originated.