stefanovich wrote: » How is the data misrepresented? I'm genuinely curious. These are all real reports as far I am aware, sourced from a government database.
PhilOssophy wrote: » No - nor are any of them claiming credit for it either.
PhilOssophy wrote: » I know they didn't develop them - but do you know that they weren't involved in peer reviewing the data, efficacy, side effects etc? The vaccine effort has been one which has involved people right across the scientific and academic research community. Who is to say that the people who did develop them didn't review some paper written by one of them as they racked their brains to think what they needed to do? How well do you know their research areas/expertise? Calling them clowns, is ridiculous. Anyway, I'm afraid I might be arguing with.....
Amirani wrote: » Yes, none of the people you listed were involved in this. It's outside the area of their expertise. Not that I agree with calling them clowns...
yourdeadwright wrote: » Fantastic news from Stephen Donnelly just in " we have manged to vaccinate every over the age 100 in Leitrim who is a Tarus "
PhilOssophy wrote: » I know they didn't develop them - but do you know that they weren't involved in peer reviewing the data, efficacy, side effects etc?
dominatinMC wrote: » You can be a scientist without actually contributing to science - namely the vaccines in this respect. Does every engineer take credit for the Concorde?
Deeper Blue wrote: » Those 4 lads had feck all to do with developing the vaccines. Nobody is criticising the people that actually developed and created them. Ridiculous argument.
PhilOssophy wrote: » I think the posters above referring to McConkey, Staines, etc as "clowns" are bang out of order. It is them and their academic colleagues who have spent year studying medicine/epidemiology/pharmacy/etc and in 1 year have developed a vaccine which we were all told would take 2-3-4 years to develop. Without people who are so passionate about minute areas of study in these fields, what would we have done? We'd probably now be looking at far greater collateral damage of elderly and vulnerable cohorts. Maybe that's what some posters on here would have preferred? When my parents walked out of their GP yesterday having got their vaccines, I thank our lucky stars that we have these great minds to put an end to this pandemic.
Deleted User wrote: » So you can also grossly misrepresented our data also?
stefanovich wrote: » Is the adverse effect data publicly accessible in Ireland as it is in the states?https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data
PhoenixParker wrote: » AZ have a factory in the Netherlands which has made a lot of vaccine but wasn't approved to supply the EU. It was stockpiled. The factory was approved last week so the stockpile is now being shipped.
Elessar wrote: » Surely with the 112k AZ that came in last night, they should be adding an extra ~100k to that total for next week?
Gael23 wrote: » Consultants refer them, how challenging can that be?
Apogee wrote: » Cumulative numbers: 819,676 doseshttps://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1377611475074879488
hynesie08 wrote: » https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1377612049753182208?s=20 240k next week, Am I adding it up right?
Apogee wrote: » 650 housebound now done (1,800 was previous estimated total). 10 ambulances in operation - each ambulance can dose 14 per day due to restrictions on vials (presumably mRNA storage requirements?).
ACitizenErased wrote: » 120-125k including 90k over 70s and 30 AZ
irishlad. wrote: » https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1377612049753182208