plodder wrote: » Risk is also based on occupation. A teacher standing in front of 30 kids is at a lot more risk than a worker working from home.
IRISHSPORTSGUY wrote: » ...
[Deleted User] wrote: » Horsesh*t
is_that_so wrote: » If they've dealt with that risk to date and continue to do so, what's the problem? We're all at risk from this and we follow appropriate guidelines.
plodder wrote: » My daughter is a teacher, has asthma, and hasn't had the bug. I work from home, have no underlying conditions, had the bug, but I'm getting the vaccine now before she does. Everyone keeps citing Denmark with their "digital identifier" as a reason why they are doing so well. I don't think it should be controversial to say if we had better IT systems linked to PPS numbers we would be able to filter out the people who need the vaccine soonest.@conor_mc. Yes, I agree with your example. Someone who is known to the health system as clinically obese, then yes they should get it sooner as well.
noplacehere wrote: » Today is the day.... will the AstraZeneca arrive? Any word yet?
Godot. wrote: » I'd say April/May by the EMA approval is possible. Their clinical trials seem very long because they want to incorporate x amount of new varients. There's talk of the EMA possibly giving it emergency authorisation rather than conditional.
3mom4 wrote: » Totally, totally gutted again, rang my GP as cohort 4. They are still saying that they have not been asked about cohort 4. GPs are on annual leave this week. (Guessing this rules them out of the opt in programme anyway). Refused to put me on any list as a list for referral doesn't exist. I just do not know where to turn anymore and have lost every shred of hope.
is_that_so wrote: » I thought it eventually became over the next week? The AZ guy here is talking up the " exciting coming weeks".https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/astrazeneca-executive-exciting-weeks-ahead-as-state-to-get-large-deliveries-1.4521286
ACitizenErased wrote: » Have you seen a consultant? Hospitals are leading this, not GPs. It's opt-in for GPs.
Wolf359f wrote: » Anything better than the past 2 weeks would be exciting. Deliveries averaged like 10k over the past 2 weeks.
3mom4 wrote: » I have no consultant.
seansouth36 wrote: » The idea that potential vaccinators would need to show their Leaving Cert results is at once totally insane and completely unsurprising. Why in God's name would that be relevant?
noplacehere wrote: » I thought if they missed the 31st then they miss the Q1 amount
Apogee wrote: » Sunday: 2,635. Mon-Sun: 123,501. They've updated the infographic to include breakdown of Dose 1 and 2 again for each Cohort.
josip wrote: » You know what day tomorrow is?
seamus wrote: » Public Sector recruitment! "We compiled a large list of boxes to be ticked, and absolutely everyone must tick all of them otherwise it would be unfair to the other people who did tick them all". If you apply for a senior position in the public sector that requires degrees and decades of experience, they will still ask for your Leaving Cert results and won't process your application until they have them or a satisfactory reason why they can't be supplied.
namloc1980 wrote: » Just heard an updated HSE ad on Newstalk. Saying 3 million doses will be administered by the end of May with 6 million by the end of June! 3 million alone in June?
josip wrote: » They would also be undermining all those parents in the history of the state who encouraged their children to get the best Leaving Cert they could so that they might get a job in the Civil Service.