stephenjmcd wrote: » At lasthttps://twitter.com/fraguarascio/status/1374808675861327877?s=19
11521323 wrote: » Can someone explain to me exactly how some nations in the EU are way ahead of us currently and in their timelines when we should all be getting the same supply per capita?
[Deleted User] wrote: » Malta appear to have done side deals, Denmark purchased vaccines other EU countries turned down, Hungary are using Sputnik and Sinopharm.
11521323 wrote: » Okay so when people support the Government by parroting the narrative that there's nothing more they could do, it's completely false. Ireland are the middle of the road in the EU for the rollout despite us being one of the most wealthy, I cannot understand it and nobody has been able to adequately explain it to me.
User142 wrote: » The Irish gov assumed that the EU rollout would be the best in the world and at a minimum as good as the US and UK rollouts so no need for additional supplies. They never saw us being so slow compared to either.
[Deleted User] wrote: » For the eu to have had a rollout like the uk would have required more than 50% of doses produced worldwide so far to have ended up in the eu. Realistic? The eu have in fact already administered more than double their fair share and will accelerate next month. We only look bad in comparison to the very top. By July there will be f all between eu, uk and us, with the subtle difference that eu plants have been suppling some other countries equally in need rather than engaging in rampant me feinism.
IRISHSPORTSGUY wrote: » https://twitter.com/MaryERegan/status/1374751646627037184
Dressoutlet wrote: » Does anyone have info on walk in test centres?
Godot. wrote: » Big day tomorrow because of Biden's meeting with the EU. Vaccines are said to be a hot topic. Will he do anything to help speed things up?
yankinlk wrote: » I don't know anyone in the US that hasn't had at least one shot. In Ireland I only know 1 person at 83 that has had one shot. What is going on why are we so slow to roll out?
Deleted User wrote: » The US blocked all exports of vaccines from plants in the us until the past week when they sent a few that they weren’t using anyway to Canada and Mexico. The EU have allowed exports to 33 countries of 40million doses from plants within the EU. If the eu had banned exports they would have administered nearly as many as the US overall and more than the uk per capita as they have been the biggest importer from the eu. Its a bit c*ntish to vaccinate young people in your own country while hcw or the very old can’t get it in countries with continuing large outbreaks. Due to the uproar the eu is now considering going down the c*ntish route, but looks like maybe only towards those countries that have already vaccinated the vulnerable, until the eu get their own vulnerable vaccinated.
Danzy wrote: » Other countries took the creation of vaccines very seriously. The Brits and yanks in the western world threw a wall of money and State support and pressure to create them. The Russians and China did likewise. Even Cuba developed it's own vaccine. The EU took a relaxed approach to it, talked about solidarity a lot and did sweet f all in relation to the gravity of the crisis. The attitude to Covid is often relaxed in much of Europe, the belief in vaccines not universal by any means. That is the real reason that a economic block with a 17 trillion Euro economy and about half the top 20 pharmaceutical companies in the world headquartered in it, can't vaccinate itself or others and is reduced to going on ad nauseam about Astra Zeneca. If the EU had made a serious effort it could have developed several other vaccines. Regarding the AZ vaccines that go now to the EU. They should only go to countries that will give them out or have bothered to put capacity to roll out volume. A big reduction in recipients from that.
NeuralNetwork wrote: » This is what’s worrying me about some of the continental rollouts - massive anti vax stuff may well result in it never reaching herd immunity. That level of scepticism is repeated in several countries.https://twitter.com/siobhandowling/status/1374782316220911627?s=2 Ireland is in many ways very lucky not to be quite so far down that rabbit hole. There’s a fair risk of this just rolling on and on and on...
New Home wrote: » Hi, I've to travel via Amsterdam on Friday morning. The Dutch website says: "Option 1 You have to show 1 test result:a negative COVID-19 NAAT (PCR) test result that was taken within 24 hours before boarding your flight to the Netherlands. Option 2 You have to show 2 test results:a negative COVID-19 NAAT (PCR) test result that was taken within 72 hours before your arrival in the Netherlands.a negative COVID-19 rapid test result that was taken within 24 hours before boarding your flight to the Netherlands. If you have a transfer in Amsterdam, you only need 1 NAAT (PCR) test result that's issued within 72 hours before arrival in Amsterdam." Randox are providing a so-called RT-PCR test, aka an express PCR rest. Is that the same as a NAAT PCR test? I can't find a definite answer on the web. Also, the PCR test is a molecular test, isn't it? Or is it an antigen one (I don't think so, but I thought I'd better double-check)? Thanks.