salmocab wrote: » There could be a major issue with people just not wanting AZ. Nothing can get this much press and not lose people’s faith. Even if research says it’s fine and unrelated people are going to be very suspicious of it.
Strawberry Milkshake wrote: » That’s all housebound people who were to be vaccinated by the ambulance service in limbo now. I was just waiting for the call from HSE to say they’d be calling on X date to vaccinate my 82 year old dad
newuser99999 wrote: » What happens if you have already had one shot of AZ?
Cork2021 wrote: » Ah stop will you! EMA already said it’s nothing out the ordinary in terms of incidence of blood clots within a population!
Cork2021 wrote: » For fûck sake!!! Suspending AZ here now as well!
CWF wrote: » Anyone know what will happen for people booked in for AZ vaccine tomorrow?
Leftwaffe wrote: » How many doses of AZ have been administered world wide so far? There’s been about 10 cases of clotting and 10s of millions of doses given out? Surely this is a non-story. Has to be investigated I know but when the WHO and EMA say to plough on, surely it’s safe to do so.
Dressoutlet wrote: » Every 47 seconds (or thereabouts) a person in the western world dies from a blood clot. This is ridiculous. So unless all the usual and extra are dying from clots there's no link. And the media won't ****ing make a big song and dance when it's back to being used in 2 weeks..
Morries Wigs wrote: » gonna put off loads from taking it -would ya blame them
malinheader wrote: » Over reaction maybe, but only going to make it harder to convince people to get the vaccine.
LuckyLloyd wrote: » I’m sorry now, but each of these blood clot reports need to be examined and ruled out as being caused directly by the vaccine. To not do so would be negligent.
Cork2021 wrote: » The EMA and WHO have said to continue using it! Over reaction more like!
Morries Wigs wrote: » NIAC is to recommend suspension of AZ vaccine following further blood clot reports
LuckyLloyd wrote: » It’s the right decision. This is how the process is supposed to work. Oversight and caution.
is_that_so wrote: » "Poster disputes article content so makes inane comment about it shocker!" Why don't you provide the evidence which allowed you to reach this genius insight, so?