stephenjmcd wrote: » MM hasn't said 850k anywhere. The IT article was updated to reflect his views on Q1 hence the article time. I've a subscription to the IT(sometimes worth it sometimes not) and read an article at 6.30 this morning and at that time it already included the 850k. They've copied it into the one you linked. Reid later said 1.1 million, which the Independent, RTE & others are reporting. His comments came after the initial IT report. Here is the original report from the early hours of this morning referencing 850khttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/less-than-half-of-expected-vaccines-to-be-delivered-in-first-quarter-1.4504737?mode=amp#.YEdRm8S4nR4.twitter
Johnson & Johnson has told the European Union it is facing supply issues that may complicate plans to deliver 55 million doses of its Covid-19 vaccine to the bloc in the second quarter of the year, an EU official has said.
trellheim wrote: » IT still havent wound in their article so currently both numbers are out there. Let's see who's right as we go along. Happy to be proved wrong when it all comes out.
is_that_so wrote: » Looks like J&J might have potential delivery issues to the EU as well. There's already a projected shortfall for March in the US so they are giving a cautious heads up well in advance.https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0309/1202910-europe-covid19/
eoinbn wrote: » The difference is the US government has already put a plan in place to get them back on track. The EU commission will just point at the contract and demand 55m by June (which is half of what the US expects by the end of May). 30% more people, 45% less doses and delivered later. At least we got it for a few quid less.
Wolf359f wrote: » Maybe read the link and then comment on it? The EU are looking to help J&J solve the issue. Similar to Pfizer and then being able to reduce the plant shutdown from 4 weeks to 1 week in order to upscale. AZ waited until a week before the delivery date to say the order will be massively reduced. Very little the EU could do at that stage.
eoinbn wrote: » They have been talking about trying to move more fill and finish to the EU for more than a month now. That is a month wasted. No doubt we will get another Q3 solution to a Q2 problem.
timsey tiger wrote: » They could have slapped export bans in place including on ingredients. You know hard ball.
irishgeo wrote: » What your solution rather than moan about it.
Water John wrote: » Sounds great, what happens when India and China who supply some of the ingredients, take your advice?
lucernarian wrote: » If you looked at the rte article and the categorization you posted, you would see that not all CF sufferers are regarded as severe cases.
quartz1 wrote: » Reuters published an article a few weeks ago that J&J were planning to export vaccine manufactured in the EU to the US to be bottled.
political analyst wrote: » How can any CF sufferer not be regarded as a severe case?
quartz1 wrote: » Reuters published an article a few weeks ago that J&J were planning to export vaccine manufactured in the EU to the US to be bottled. It just seems that the EU have been asleep at the wheel with this process. The Irish Government need to at least make an effort to source vaccine outside of the EU deal. Tonight's RTE News showing pallets of Sputnik been delivered to Hungary and the Czech Republic. It wouldn't be my first choice but based on the expert opinion I would happily take my chances with it .
CruelSummer wrote: » Would Ireland have any influence with the US and pharma groups here? We seriously need to get more aggressive about this. We’ve a small population compared to other countries.
stephenjmcd wrote: » Pharma production here is mainly medical devices. It just wouldn't be possible in a short time frame to switch production to vaccine production. Its highly specialised. As for get more aggressive, with whom & do what ?
theoneeyedman wrote: » Pharma and Medical Devices are 2 completely different industries.