trellheim wrote: » umm yeah but no but If you read the frustration in Donnellys speech to the Dail on Thursday they are getting messed around tremendously on vaccine deliveries. We are now into month 3 of q1 and the messing shows no signs of stopping ( and the minister gave no hint that it would stop, only falling back on this "oh q2 may be better" ) Handwaving severe supply issues into Q2 is wrong needs fixing NOW, we have aeroplanes (lots of them sitting idle) to go and get deliveries
stephenjmcd wrote: » It really wasn't, all along April, May and June have been mentioned for an large increase in supply. It was well flagged that the first few months would be difficult and Q1 supplies would be limited.
celt262 wrote: » It's promised deliveries arriving and shortage of syringes that i would be worried about.
ixoy wrote: » Is it though? If it was easy to ramp up production, for one of them even, they'd do it. Why wouldn't they - they'd be ahead of their competitors as everyone rushed to buy their product. That'd be a massive win. So it's not then something easy to switch over - clearly a complex system that few of us can truly appreciate. It being an emergency, doesn't change certain certain time constraints once they know their product works and is wanted. Switching over existing facilities will take time (and potentially lead to medicine shortages elsewhere). Switching over in advance of having the results and approval wouldn't have made sense either, given the potential losses and disruption to other medicines. It's obviously frustrating to all, but there's no conspiracy here and it's not really head scratching. It's something that seven billion people want and that's not an easy task.
is_that_so wrote: » That was mostly Donnelly being excitable! Pfizer have said as much about ramping up in April, we'll also have J&J and the HSE are talking about 1m+ doses a month from April in promised deliveries.
Sweet.Science wrote: » I'll hold my breath with the Q2 is when it really ramps up talk . The same was said for March in January
is_that_so wrote: » The demand is in the billions and the process is very specialised to get up and running, so it's not really. Q2 is where that starts but as the CMO says we're not there yet!
jackryan34 wrote: » Its head scratching what's going on, if it continues much longer, as in April onwards questions need to be asked re supply
jackryan34 wrote: » If this was a product in any other industry it would be called an artificial demand tactic Its head scratching what's going on, if it continues much longer, as in April onwards questions need to be asked re supply
ixoy wrote: » Impossible. Only Jokeshop Ireland has a supply issue! Maybe this sort of thing, and Canada's issues, will drive home the supply issue is a worldwide thing that's impacting many first world countries and that the US and UK are outliers because it's still not fully understood.
SusanC10 wrote: » My Mum is 80+ and sister Group 4. Rang GP Friday and they couldn't say when either of them would get Vaccine. They are not finished 85+.
is_that_so wrote: » A lack of vaccine supply and a shortage of specialty syringes.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Did anyone at all from Cohort 4 hear anything? I saw one person on twitter got a call but didn't see anything else.
Deleted User wrote: » Did anyone at all from Cohort 4 hear anything? I saw one person on twitter got a call but didn't see anything else.
Sanjuro wrote: » Surprised at Japan. Would have thought they'd be on the same course as the EU and the US. What would be their delay?
is_that_so wrote: » BBC article on the challenges to Asian countries of vaccinating with a disappointing graphic of when it all might be done.https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-56150755
Pablo Escobar wrote: » If they are under 80 and not in a home, that is why. Their segment of cohort 3 starts next week, I think.
expectationlost wrote: » my parents are over 75 and haveî heard nothing, so over over 70s are not being done currently.