Knex* wrote: » That wouldn't inspire you with great confidence.
stephenjmcd wrote: » 65 small practices according to HSE with a total over 85 population of 800 are proving difficult. 20-25 practices impacted impacted by supply issues this week be it no supply or less supply than expected and these are currently being worked through for delivery in the coming days. NAS now involved in the house bound vaccinations for all over 70s so that is being dealt with. Vast majority of over 85s completed this week bar some of the above mentioned. It's pretty much on schedule they say. To be fair to them the issues seem to be getting ironed out
stefanovich wrote: » How are countries that ordered early, paid more and ordered excess faring with supply?
Elessar wrote: » They are an absolute joke. The 25k not delivered last week which were due to be delivered by this weekend are now again pushed out to the end of March. Expect another number of "rebalancing" (read: delay) in supplies next week, and on and on.
stephenjmcd wrote: » NAS now involved in the house bound vaccinations for all over 70s so that is being dealt with.
Manach wrote: » NAS = National Ambulance Service? Thanks for the info. I've not been able to find actionable information for the situation for those housebound, as while the HSE have been saying that plans are in place for that group, they do reveal exactly what those are.
stephenjmcd wrote: » And you need at least 200+ over the age of 70 for in practice delivery. The biggest practices were in the trial run in week 1 of the 85+ rollout
average_runner wrote: » That is not actually true. Down home practices got theirs the first week and wouldn't be that big, actually down home said all over 85's were done in the first week for the county!! The practices here, are very big and easily over a 1000 70 year olds in the clinic. The Doctors in the clinics got their vaccine which was great. HSE is filling you with stories that change again the following week. All the people want is the truth and not make up positive news they can't deliver. That causes more harm to people.
is_that_so wrote: » There are very few of those, both the US & UK have access to supplies produced in country.
average_runner wrote: » Or i believe the GP that I go to. That he got none of his shipment last week, either did any GP in our area.
stefanovich wrote: » https://www.politico.eu/article/the-key-differences-between-the-eu-and-uk-astrazeneca-contracts/ This article suggests the UK just had a better contract than the EU. The UK were not forcing AZ's hand. So it does appear the EU messed up the contract.
is_that_so wrote: » We've long since moved past the contracts into real world supplies. That's not an actual EU purview. I don't think the EU are likely to take up any further options on AZ at this stage.
stefanovich wrote: » Well that matters. The wording of the EU contract only required a "best effort" at supply. The UK contract was more strict. Probably why they paid more too. The UK government did a better job than the EU.
stephenjmcd wrote: » Pending supply of course, next week 8th to 15th March Long term care Dose 1 - 500 (Pfizer) Dose 2 - 11,000 (Pfizer) FHCW Dose 1 - 25,000 (AZ) Dose 2 - 666 (Pfizer) Over 70s Dose 1 - 37,000 (Pfizer) Cohort 4 as announced earlier today Dose 1 - 10,000 (AZ) Total planned - 84,166
seamus wrote: » AZ are a mess of a company. One would have to wonder if they decided that their privileged position as the only vaccine to be stored at fridge temps was short-lived, so they're sending supplies to the countries paying the highest prices? Once J&J come out with a single-shot, room-temp vaccine with better results than AZ it seems likely that demand for AZ amongst wealthier countries will collapse.
Sweet.Science wrote: » Still over 60k getting their 1st jab. Thats the way im looking at it . 60k who will no longer be amongst future cases, hospitalisations or deaths .
ACitizenErased wrote: » https://twitter.com/DarrenEuronews/status/1367497688485363722?s=20
Tippbhoy1 wrote: » AZ are just not a big player when it comes to global production and it’s really showing now. It’s a real pity for Oxford that they had to succumb to the political pressure of Boris and co when they wanted to partner with Merck. It’s worked out well for the UK but not much for anyone else. If the UK hadn’t taken all the original supply from the EU factories as well, I wonder would they be struggling now too. Either way, I’d say we won’t be seeing much more of AZ in Europe in a few months
D.Q wrote: » bit of a mental statement for a company that developed a vaccine for a novel virus within 12 months of it becoming prevalent. I appreciate people are frustrated but come on. There was always going to be logistical issues after the science side was sorted.