stefanovich wrote: » AZ are a private company with multiple contracts with multiple countries. The EU contract is weak. They are not playing by the rules and just trying to cover up their incompetence. This sort of hostile behaviour is reckless.
ACitizenErased wrote: » AstraZeneca can't meet deliveries and decide to send 250k abroad yet the EU is irrational?
ACitizenErased wrote: » https://twitter.com/DarrenEuronews/status/1367497688485363722?s=20
timsey tiger wrote: » It is not a statement it is a question. It turns out thet the UK actually signed their contract the day after the EU not months before as has been widely reported and it was very similar. The UK are also paying more per dose and have stuck their noses in all over so who knows what levers have been pulled.
stefanovich wrote: » The EU are starting to behave very irrationally. von der Leyen is way out of her depth and should quit before she causes more chaos.
D.Q wrote: » bit of a mental statement for a company that developed a vaccine for a novel virus within 12 months of it becoming prevalent. I appreciate people are frustrated but come on. There was always going to be logistical issues after the science side was sorted.
Tippbhoy1 wrote: » AZ are just not a big player when it comes to global production and it’s really showing now. It’s a real pity for Oxford that they had to succumb to the political pressure of Boris and co when they wanted to partner with Merck. It’s worked out well for the UK but not much for anyone else. If the UK hadn’t taken all the original supply from the EU factories as well, I wonder would they be struggling now too. Either way, I’d say we won’t be seeing much more of AZ in Europe in a few months
Sweet.Science wrote: » Still over 60k getting their 1st jab. Thats the way im looking at it . 60k who will no longer be amongst future cases, hospitalisations or deaths .
seamus wrote: » AZ are a mess of a company. One would have to wonder if they decided that their privileged position as the only vaccine to be stored at fridge temps was short-lived, so they're sending supplies to the countries paying the highest prices? Once J&J come out with a single-shot, room-temp vaccine with better results than AZ it seems likely that demand for AZ amongst wealthier countries will collapse.
stephenjmcd wrote: » Pending supply of course, next week 8th to 15th March Long term care Dose 1 - 500 (Pfizer) Dose 2 - 11,000 (Pfizer) FHCW Dose 1 - 25,000 (AZ) Dose 2 - 666 (Pfizer) Over 70s Dose 1 - 37,000 (Pfizer) Cohort 4 as announced earlier today Dose 1 - 10,000 (AZ) Total planned - 84,166
stefanovich wrote: » Well that matters. The wording of the EU contract only required a "best effort" at supply. The UK contract was more strict. Probably why they paid more too. The UK government did a better job than the EU.
is_that_so wrote: » We've long since moved past the contracts into real world supplies. That's not an actual EU purview. I don't think the EU are likely to take up any further options on AZ at this stage.
stefanovich wrote: » https://www.politico.eu/article/the-key-differences-between-the-eu-and-uk-astrazeneca-contracts/ This article suggests the UK just had a better contract than the EU. The UK were not forcing AZ's hand. So it does appear the EU messed up the contract.
average_runner wrote: » Or i believe the GP that I go to. That he got none of his shipment last week, either did any GP in our area.
is_that_so wrote: » There are very few of those, both the US & UK have access to supplies produced in country.
average_runner wrote: » That is not actually true. Down home practices got theirs the first week and wouldn't be that big, actually down home said all over 85's were done in the first week for the county!! The practices here, are very big and easily over a 1000 70 year olds in the clinic. The Doctors in the clinics got their vaccine which was great. HSE is filling you with stories that change again the following week. All the people want is the truth and not make up positive news they can't deliver. That causes more harm to people.
stephenjmcd wrote: » And you need at least 200+ over the age of 70 for in practice delivery. The biggest practices were in the trial run in week 1 of the 85+ rollout