Stheno wrote: » Sever infection may not need hospitalisation?
KrustyUCC wrote: » Funny Bouchar-Hayes, Claire Byrne and George Lee all mentioned the California Variant yesterday
D.Q wrote: » If the rats on the titanic figured they could spread bull**** about variants to try save themselves they probably would too. Same with the rats mentioned above. All the above hacks have chosen one last shot at relevance over the integrity their profession is meant to be all about.
Del Griffith wrote: » Anyone know if the Irish governments flimsy attempt at a vaccine rollout forecast (June, September, end of the year) takes into account the possibility of the J&J vaccine? It looks very likely to be approved now, days in the USA and apparently about 2 weeks for the EU. Could this speed things up for Ireland?
hynesie08 wrote: » Can we swap them? 10 AZ for a pfizer?
lbj666 wrote: » https://twitter.com/sailorrooscout/status/1364375627953020937?s=20 Will we just turn this thread to a feed of whoever this is.
lucernarian wrote: » Given that some of the criteria for severe infection necessarily require being in a hospital. I guess "death" and "systemic organ failure" doesn't need to involve a hospital but out of 20k+ people in a study, the difference between 100% and 85% could do with further clarification.
harr wrote: » So after multiple good news story’s yesterday about vaccines and how successful they can be even against variants.. a lot of the Irish media still solely focused on a non story about a variation coming from the US .. Simply because it was the only negative narrative they found yesterday. RTÉ journalists in particular yesterday sounded even disappointed about the good news on the vaccine front. I think a lot of them are realising now that once covid starts to drop out of the headlines they won’t be in a job and are pushing as much doom on us as they can.
Akabusi wrote: » I agree with you on the overly negative reporting that is going on, but you are wrong to think that these journalists will not have their jobs once this is over. They had them long before the Covid and will keep them after it is gone.
Le Bruise wrote: » Not sure if discussed previously, but Luke O'Neill was on Newstalk earlier, bigging up the vaccine from French company Valneva. Apparently it'll work well against any variant due to the technology used, so no seasonal tweaking needed. In phase II trials now, hoping for Q3 approval.
marno21 wrote: » Itll be the first inactivated virus vaccine approved in much of the western world (the Chinese vaccines are of this type) Given that it includes the whole virus it would confer immunity to more than just the spike protein, so wouldn’t be affected by the spike protein mutations.
The U.K. has signed a deal to secure 40 million extra doses of Valneva's coronavirus vaccine candidate, in addition to the 60 million it had already agreed to buy, the government and the French biotech announced Monday. The new deal follows a multi-million-pound joint investment in Valneva's facility in Livingston, West Lothian, by the U.K. in 2020 as part of an in-principle agreement to secure early access.
ceegee wrote: » Monday update
irishlad. wrote: » Not the best start to our 100k target this week. Hopefully we can catch up
marno21 wrote: » The document doesn’t tell us when the doses are being delivered or distributed so it may be best to withhold judgment on the weekly target until the end of the week
seamus wrote: » If you compare the reports day-by-day, you can see figures constantly being backfilled. So whatever is reported today as being done on Monday isn't the final figure, only what has been reported as of today. I expect as numbers ramp up, priority will be given by doctors to the actual vaccinations rather than reporting the numbers, so we'll always be 5-7 days behind.
marno21 wrote: » Indeed. I was thinking that the move to daily reporting would just lead to criticism of the rollout due to incomplete data/variance of day to day totals etc. It’s the weekly figures that tell the real story And of course, shots into arms is a far more important use of resources than accurate reporting
tfeldi wrote: » Solid and on time HSE internal reporting is crucial to plan resources and identify issues. And when you have a solid internal reporting process you can then easily share summary Numbers externally. Keep in mind that it is not medical personnel preparing the reporting.