hmmm wrote: » I think it was Macron yesterday who suggested we immediately give 5% of our vaccine supply to poorer countries. I fully agree. Aside from any moral arguments, these countries have far fewer healthcare staff to start with and it is in our interest to suppress infection levels in other countries and reduce the chance of new variants emerging. The moral argument is strong too.
Gael23 wrote: » Is there some sarcasm here? Not making sense to me
Water John wrote: » It's this simple, vaccine stops you getting seriously ill. Secondly, you are unlikely to give Covid to another person. It's the second point we had been waiting for data on and it's now arrived.
titan18 wrote: » How much overseas aid comes from the richer countries to poorer? Considering tax take is through the floor in a lot of the richer countries cos of covid, strong argument that more of them will die if we can't get our economies going again to provide that aid. 32 EU countries, many of them smaller, have had more deaths than Zimbabwe (country in that article), so why should we not prioritise ourselves when it's having a larger effect here
funnydoggy wrote: » Holy moly with the good news. This *surely* means things will be better a lot sooner
AdamD wrote: » Quite surprised the idea of pushing out second shots of Pfizer doesn't seem to have been mentioned at all in Ireland?
Le Bruise wrote: » It should mean that alright! Can someone who knows more than me (not too hard) tell us if this transmission news means we can reach critical mass for herd immunity at a lower percentage of the population vaccinated then previously thought? Makes sense in my head, but I may not be factoring something in.
Deleted User wrote: » The point of the article is the moral, economic and practical argument for vaccinating healthcare workers in poor countries. And it argues it well. Much of the aid provided was aimed at making these healthcare systems a little bit better and more resilient. Covid is now putting this progress at risk. Makes sense to try and use vaccines to preserve the progress made. It'll cost more in the long run if you don't.
is_that_so wrote: » We're at 4 weeks on those two vaccines, the limit from testing. AZ is the only one out at 12 weeks.
Deleted User wrote: » Limit from testing was actually 6 weeks.
lbj666 wrote: » Lot of fuss over misuse of spares in the Combe if you recall, even before that news broke the policy was already in place to keep a short notice reserve list of 100 names (of priority ) Very likely something similar will be in place for the GPs, kind of easier just ring anyone who's due in the following week invite them in earlier.
is_that_so wrote: » For which one? That 4 week on the first two was stated by the HSE/NIAC. A link would be great here.
foozzybear61 wrote: » Got both my shots on a short notice reserve list ..given 40 minutes notice to attend a nursing home from the organization I work for .. Had to wait there until 5 others turned up so they could open the last remaining bottle . I would gladly have turned up at 4 am in the morning if that's what it took
stephenjmcd wrote: » Just on expected supply up to the end of Q1 I've just spotted Slovakia publishing their expected supply broken down week by week, their population is a little less than Ireland and they expect 816,698 vaccines before end of March. Would tie in with the expectation here of 898,218 PFIZER 22.2.2021-56160 dose 1.3.2021-51480 dose 8.3.2021-51480 dose 15.3.2021-51480 dose 22.3.2021-51480 dose 29.3.2021-51480 dose MODERNA 22.2.2021-22800 dose 15.3.2021-75600 dose ASTRAZENECA 22.2.2021-45600 dose 1.3.2021-70842 dose 3.3.2021-43832 dose 10.3.2021-16055 dose 15.3.2021-44061 dose 22.3.2021-107044 dose 29.3.2021-116959 dose
Icantthinkof1 wrote: » My 84 yr old dad just got a call from his gp today to say they had a vaccine left over and invited him up for his. Mum said she’d never seen him move so fast, he literally ran up the road to the drs surgery. Delighted with himself We’re delighted and so relieved!
ACitizenErased wrote: » Does anyone fancy working out how this schedule works with priority groups
josip wrote: » If it's 900,000 vaccines by the end of Q1, that's 450,000 people. Which would have us about two thirds through Group 3 I think. 1.1m vaccines would have us finished all of Groups 1,2,3. (Not all Group 3 will have their 2nd dose, but some Group 4 etc, will have 1st dose)
Deleted User wrote: » Remember group 3 are not getting AZ
josip wrote: » If it's 900,000 vaccines by the end of Q1, that's 450,000 people. Which would have us about two thirds through Group 3 I think. 1.1m vaccines would have us finished all of Groups 1,2,3. If we only get 350,000 Pfizer before the end of Q1, that will mean that Group 3 is only 50% done.All of Group 4 would be done with the 400,000+ AZs and almost all of Group 5.
ACitizenErased wrote: » I swear I heard Colm Henry saying yesterday that AZ will not be used for over 65s but open to correction