hynesie08 wrote: » 66 over 85's. Over 8000 jabs though...
Van.Bosch wrote: » He is getting flak on Twitter but we are getting data today as at 15th, so that is the lag. The data in it should be good, i highly doubt we only did 66 vaccines on Monday?
[Deleted User] wrote: » .
Apogee wrote: » Here is the source for infographic on Fergal Bowers tweet:https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/news/newsfeatures/covid19-updates/integrated-information-service-vaccination-programme-dashboard.html
Please note the following: 1. There will be a two-day lag in publication.2. The number recorded as having been delivered will always be modestly below the number actually delivered. This will be due to a lag in a small number of cases between the actual administration of the vaccination and the subsequent recording of details on the system.
Van.Bosch wrote: » The daily stats seem to be released later than usual today. I look for these daily now with more joy than the evening cases numbers. Maybe as vaccines are now due for Monday which was day 1 of GPS, it takes longer to collate.
Deleted User wrote: » On my work VPN which is routed through the UK the first result is:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/18/south-african-covid-variant-may-cut-pfizer-vaccine-protection-by-two-thirds On my personal device the top result is:https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0218/1197841-coronavirus-global/
ACitizenErased wrote: » Funny how when you search Pfizer on Google the only news website that appears at the top with the SA story is.... RTE. Shock.
ACitizenErased wrote: » RTE trying to freak the **** out of old people is what's going on
timsey tiger wrote: » Seems likely that there won't be a need. Remember that a bit less than fantastic is still very good. AZ may be a different story, but we are awaiting further updates.
Level 42 wrote: » A few days ago phfizer announced it was great against SA variant now its gone opposite what's going on
Gile_na_gile wrote: » It depends on whether or WHEN a new booster can be introduced to halt the spread of the SA and Bristol variants (all of which feature the same E484K mutation, I read) as vaccination against vanilla Covid and B.1.1.7 makes an impact. We don't know yet how the mRNAs stack against it in the population but we'll see soon. The Novavax trial might be a good proxy since it had a similarly high original efficacy, and that was 49.4% efficacy against the SA variant in Phase 2b trials. Perhaps the better vaccines might block some transmission and thus bring R below 1 for that as well.
Deleted User wrote: » And it still produces a significant antibody response. Just less than the massive response against original variant. Would class this as good news
landofthetree wrote: » Pretty much the same as in Israel.
ACitizenErased wrote: » https://twitter.com/sailorrooscout/status/1362180674761986049?s=20
leahyl wrote: » Did anybody hear/read this, this morning - from RTE website: "As the roll-out of GP vaccinations of the over 85s gathers pace, the protection given by even one dose of vaccine may already be impacting on the official data. 102,000 vaccine doses were given to residents and staff in nursing homes by Sunday last. The disease incidence among the over-85s fell 57% last week alone - by far the highest reduction for any age group. 166,000 vaccine doses were also given to healthcare workers and by the end of last week they were accounting for 5% of weekly cases, down from 13% three weeks earlier." Good news
stephenjmcd wrote: » If your going to come in with a line like that at least provide some background. Anyway I went off and did a little Google search and got the below. UTMB professor and study co-author Pei-Yong Shi said he believes the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine will likely protect against the variant. “We don’t know what the minimum neutralising number is. We don’t have that cutoff line,” he said, adding that he suspects the immune response observed is likely to be significantly above where it needs to be to provide protection. That is because in clinical trials, both the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and a similar shot from Moderna Inc conferred some protection after a single dose with an antibody response lower than the reduced levels caused by the South African variant in the laboratory study. Not to mention this also on the account linked by hmm [Url] https://twitter.com/sailorrooscout/status/1362180674761986049?s=19 [\url][/url]
hynesie08 wrote: » Not really
Gael23 wrote: » Concerning news from Pfizer regarding the SA variant
hmmm wrote: » My new favourite person on Twitter (who works for Moderna) posts lots of interesting stuff about variants and vaccines that is both very technical, very accessible and really helps to set the mind at ease.https://twitter.com/sailorrooscout/status/1360921398512914442