Alrigghtythen wrote: » Open the windows
Boggles wrote: » You need to contact the department with this new information.
Yosef Stocky Backspace wrote: » And if there aren't any?
Jim_Hodge wrote: » Windows will be provided.
Yosef Stocky Backspace wrote: » That will take some creative reconfiguration! Around 12 rooms with no windows in my last school.
Alrigghtythen wrote: » Open the door
Yosef Stocky Backspace wrote: » Sure. Sounds like perfectly adequate ventilation. Unfortunately two of those rooms, the door just opens into another classroom. Would that be increasing or decreasing risks?
caveat emptor wrote: » You seem to think of it as being binary. Nobody is saying you can't get it if someone spits in your face intentionally or unintentionally. Spending all day in a room with 30 kids and no windows open increases the likelihood massively of AIRBORNE transmission. That is you can sanitise your hands all you want. Keep your distance etc. You can still get infected. If that is not even a given at this stage then good luck everyone. See you back here for the post mortem. Don't take my word for it take the WHO's => "It's airborne"https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1279765631680892929?s=20
Alrigghtythen wrote: » Following a 2.5-hour choir practice attended by 61 persons, including a symptomatic index patient, 32 confirmed and 20 probable secondary COVID-19 cases occurred (attack rate = 53.3% to 86.7%); three patients were hospitalized, and two died. Transmission was likely facilitated by close proximity (within 6 feet) during practice and augmented by the act of singing. The 2.5-hour singing practice provided several opportunities for droplet and fomite transmission, including members sitting close to one another, sharing snacks, and stacking chairs at the end of the practice. The act of singing, itself, might have contributed to transmission through emission of aerosols, which is affected by loudness of vocalization One member had symptoms and came the next week Questionable hand hygiene, eating oranges and stacking chairs Median age 65 In marchhttps://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6919e6.htm The dept. Aren't asking teachers to have 61 over 65s singing in the corner of the classroom
Flow physics plays a key role in nearly every facet of the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes the generation and aerosolization of virus-laden respiratory droplets from a host, its airborne dispersion and deposition on surfaces, as well as the subsequent inhalation of these bioaerosols by unsuspecting recipients. Fluid dynamics is also key to preventative measures such as the use of face masks, hand washing, ventilation of indoor environments and even social distancing. This article summarizes what we know and, more importantly, what we need to learn about the science underlying these issues so that we are better prepared to tackle the next outbreak of COVID-19 or a similar disease. ........ Our hope is that not only will this article serve as a call-to-arms to fluid dynamicists, it will also provide a starting point for the researcher who is motivated to tackle the science of COVID-19, and other similar diseases that are sure to appear in the not-too-distant future.
xhomelezz wrote: » Or break the wall
caveat emptor wrote: » I'd have to say increase bob. Remember when you were in school and some undesirable little so and so had too many beans for breakfast...... You see where I'm going with this. That gives you a good proxy for aerosols. We were always breathing in each others noxious fumes whether we liked it or not. You don't have to be an aerosol scientist.
Yosef Stocky Backspace wrote: » But they're completely internal rooms. The walls just lead to another room.
Deleted User wrote: » An good proxy for understanding transmission risk Is if you can smell their breath you are in range of infection, as explained by Dr Eanna Falvey, chief medical officer of world rugby who is well versed in infection control, and you know a professional, rather than a random poster talking about farts. Why does hydrogen sulphide spread further than SARS-2 CoV. Because it’s orders of magnitude smaller
Alrigghtythen wrote: » They've given the answers in road map. • Regular and good hand hygiene; • Good respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette; • Enhanced cleaning regimes; and • Maintaining physical distancing in the classroom and within schools; Teachers role is to identify where these occur in the class room and take steps to reduce the risk. Are they not capable of assessing thier classrooms for A) placement of sanitizer B)Spacing & Moving desks to maximise distance C) Encouraging hygiene through routines D) identify common touch items for enhanced cleaning E) with thier colleagues identifying isolation area and a strategy deal with a suspected case F) work with thier colleagues to establish staggered break times ?
caveat emptor wrote: » Convection my friend. Convection. Tinnier tiny particles get carried by the invisible wind that is all around us. We are but in a state of flux. If only you could see. I may be random. But I'm not wrong.
caveat emptor wrote: » Here's a picture which paints a thousand words.https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1280903785703976961?s=20
[Deleted User] wrote: » It’s not just the presence of particles that cause infection, but also the numbers
the corpo wrote: » I'm quite worried that they are ignorant of the science. Page 24 of the document categorically states that covid is not airborne and physical separation (which they can't even promise) is enough to halt any spread. The science disputes this.
Deleted User wrote: » It’s not just the presence of particles that cause infection, but also the numbers
Smacruairi wrote: » Just a quick one. You clearly have your mind set, that's fine, there is no way of swaying you. But if, if, it turns out that the infections rise, and what we say comes true, what will be your response. Will you go after the govt or who with as much tenacity as you have shown in debating here? What would it take for you to change your mind and consider what the teachers are saying? This isn't a gotcha, just genuinely asking.
[Deleted User] wrote: » How many of these teachers have actually gone in to the schools and measured the classrooms and attempted to see how many desks can fit in with all the extra furniture removed? Or how many are just saying, room 10 is very small, no way we can fit first year English in there. And masks are also recommended when as a last resort and 1m is not possible
glack wrote: » I did. If I remove ALL of the storage (sure who needs supplies like paper or maths equipment or the luxury of books?) and push my desk against the top wall, I can fit 18 students. This involves some children’s desk also touching the front wall and they will be unable to see the whiteboard or interactive panel. I will also need to stay glued to the front of the room as if I even take one step away from the wall I’m no longer the required distance away from students. I’m also at a loss as to what I’m supposed to do with the approximately 10 students (don’t have final numbers yet) and SNA who don’t fit?
Peter Flynt wrote: » Schools will fully reopen and close again within 4-6 weeks because of the lack of observation of Social Distancing. I hope I'm proved wrong but Dept of Education are reckless with public health and safety in returning 1 million students full time. We won't open pubs now yet we expect to make that much progress in 4 weeks? Total madness. The solution should have been to bring students back 50% of time and 50% with online or home study until the October mid term break and, if successful, everyone full time from November onwards. Instead we want the lot NOW.