GazzaL wrote: » People do though. That's the point. We need to mitigate risk. We need to maintain good hygiene standards and social distancing.
tom1ie wrote: » Yes. Plus wear masks.
xtal191 wrote: » https://twitter.com/BenatBroderick/status/1284448539783946244
GazzaL wrote: » Supermarkets weren't "flung open", they never closed. Cases dropped because of good hygiene and social distancing, and also because steps were taken to improve conditions in nursing homes. The two things that helped reduce transmission amongst the general public are being lost because of all the people banging on about masks.
polesheep wrote: » You are wasting your time. You are arguing with people who are vulnerable, elderly or very frightened. They want you to exist as they do. Just ignore them.
khalessi wrote: » I just find it bizarre that people wont wear a mask as it not rocket science
Overheal wrote: » Actually most of us are very healthy people who would fall into the low risk categories for death or disability from coronavirus. It’s just that we’re also in the category of intelligent people who are concerned about the vulnerable and the elderly and the frightened. What’s your excuse? Some hard man who thinks he can’t be an asymptomatic carrier, can’t infect your loved ones who aren’t as bullet proof? Are you from Krypton or what else is your secret to that level of self inflated sense of invincibility, tbph?
polesheep wrote: » Why can't you just accept that most people will wear one and that's what counts. Why hound people?
fr336 wrote: » Well you will be existing in a certain way now the law on masks is here I guess the government just ignored you.
khalessi wrote: » My niece in same boat, wears her mask everywhere and when we see here we all wear masks. She has always known the odds of her getting through her 20s,she is 18, but never thought we would have a pandemic. As he says wear a mask to protect him or my niece and they will wear a mask to protect you.
polesheep wrote: » You know nothing about 'most' people and nothing about me, so your post is nonsense.
Overheal wrote: » So you get to be the expert on what type of people are here and nobody else does? Affording yourself even more special standards I see.
polesheep wrote: » I know you get a kick out of seeing people wearing masks against their will, but that's actually very sad.
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I find it bizarre that we weren't advised to wear masks only a few weeks ago but we are now? I saw something in the Irish Times today about a 'snazzy' mask that can be made from your granddad's old pyjamas - sounds very scientific to me and will no doubt stop a deadly virus in its tracks!
Elmer Blooker wrote: » I find it bizarre that we weren't advised to wear masks only a few weeks ago but we are now?
odyssey06 wrote: » Some true colours coming out. This post just drips with contempt for those who are most vulnerable to the coronavirus. By contrast those urging people to wear masks - and in their ranks are the healthy and vulnerable - stress their fraternity and solidarity with all in this crisis.
odyssey06 wrote: » We didnt... we lost well over a thousand people here.
khalessi wrote: » Well originally there were not enough masks to go around and we were also on lockdown. Now we are mixing, the R number is going up qucker than expected and masks are plentiful, so wearing masks is better than lockdown
timmy_mallet wrote: » Well, no, excess mortality was not associated with that quantity.
odyssey06 wrote: » Provide a source or stop posting fake news.
odyssey06 wrote: » Provide a source or stop posting fake news. We lost well over 1000 people here to coronavirus. Waiting for your figures.
timmy_mallet wrote: » Provide a source? For the excess mortality? Has your head been in the sand? It was headline news for days a couple of weeks ago