Be right back wrote: » Got these in Dunnes, 5 for a fiver.
ExMachina1000 wrote: » Who is enforcing the wearing of masks on public transport?
na1 wrote: » bus drivershttps://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/french-bus-driver-dies-after-attack-by-passengers-who-refused-to-wear-masks-1.4302590
Hurrache wrote: » Obligatory post in case you missed all the others, Sinn Fein are in agreement with the decision.
sp00k wrote: » Is the mask requirement in shops now in immediate effect?
Kopparberg Strawberry and Lime wrote: » No we're not. .... I am in my hole going to be telling people to wear a mask.
stephenjmcd wrote: » No, legislation required
ShyMets wrote: » Mandatory from Monday. But legislation is not place yet
(a) the person cannot put on, wear or remove a face covering – (i) because of any physical or mental illness, impairment, or disability, or (ii) without severe distress,
Under the regulations, where a passenger is not wearing a face covering, a “relevant person” – including public transport staff such as bus and train drivers, as well as National Transport Authority officials – may request the passenger to wear a face covering, refuse the passenger entry to the public transport vehicle, or may request the passenger to alight from the vehicle. In a statement, gardaí said: “In circumstances where a non-compliant passenger, without reasonable excuse, fails to accept the refusal or comply with a ‘relevant person’s’ request, members of An Garda Síochána may be called to assist.” While the National Bus and Rail Union has welcomed the move towards mandatory mask-wearing, the union’s general secretary, Dermot O’Leary, said his members would not be policing the regulations. He said if a dispute arose over the non-wearing of masks, transport staff would contact the control centre to call gardaí to the scene.
Deleted User wrote: » Spend 5 minutes or less in a shop socially distanced, you gotta wear a mask. Can sit in a restaurant for 105 minutes and not be expected to wear one for practical reason such as eating. Makes complete sense to me :rolleyes:
stephenjmcd wrote: » No its not. "The new regulation has not yet been drafted and could take a matter of “days or weeks” to be signed off on, said government sources."
na1 wrote: » I wonder, are we allowed to wear the face cover and full eye protection when entering banks and An Post offices? For the sake of Holy COVID?
Seanergy wrote: » https://twitter.com/jeremyphoward/status/1283505175206916096
timetogo1 wrote: » Nah. Most people are not idiots.
timmy_mallet wrote: » What I took from that was that masks are a placebo. There is extremely limited evidence they work, but the paradox that wearing them encourages greater compliance with social distancing seems likely the greatest contributor to their efficacy, how odd.
Tork wrote: » I clicked through to Jeremy Howard's Twitter account to see what he was talking about. He is very pro-mask.
moonage wrote: » All the masked crusaders on here are being hoodwinked. Mandatory mask wearing has more to do with superstition and optics than public health. It's all a load of balls and will make shag-all difference.
khalessi wrote: » Yes indeed, which is why HCW have worn masks for years on wards to hoodwink the public, the illumanati are involved, something to do with golden ratio and aliens but not prevention of infection, never prevention of the spread of Covid19.
na1 wrote: » good deal for them!))) 50x Microfibre Car Cleaning Cloths 30 x 30 cm £10.99https://www.ebay.ie/itm/50x-Microfibre-Car-Cleaning-Cloths-Large-Detailing-Towel-Soft-Cloth-Wash-Towels/392789177989 you can make at least 2 masks of one towel