sheepsh4gger wrote: How packed is the Luas and Dart? I'm going back to work next week. Will be wearing a painting respirator, the normies can fly a kite.
sheepsh4gger wrote: » How packed is the Luas and Dart? I'm going back to work next week. Will be wearing a painting respirator, the normies can fly a kite. I wonder how they want everyone to go back to work and still have trains running half empty. (I don't say 'half full', bite me) They would need to set things up so ppl work at night, have varied working hours. But I bet everyone will just pile up on the 8:40 bus.
ShyMets wrote: » What exactly are normies
Wombatman wrote: » In Galway City yesterday. Would say less than 5% wearing masks.
Wombatman wrote: In Galway City yesterday. Would say less than 5% wearing masks.
McGiver wrote: » Lahinch, holiday resort on the Atlantic Way, in Co Clare. Full of people, almost business as usual. Americans, Spanish, Irish young people. Pubs regulate number of people inside but I can't see how that achieves anything. We were sitting in a tiny café with 12 other people. No masks anyone including the staff, they just have glass shield at the counter, that's all.
Tork wrote: » That isn't the point that McGiver was making and you know it. What good is him staying at home going to do if there is a significant minority of the population which has thrown all the guidelines out the window.
ginoginelli wrote: » What is with alot of people in retail wearing visors instead of masks? Visors look to be a excellent additional layer of protection to the wearer, when worn with a mask, but from what I have read if just the visor is used, they do not protect from possible infection - via aerosolization. They are definitely better than nothing, and I think they are ideal for children or people with medical issues, but they should not be instead of a mask, but rather used in conjunction.
is_that_so wrote: » And my point is that you have no control over what others do, just over your own behaviour and choices.
Tork wrote: » Other people are making choices that could affect us all. Do you want another lockdown?
Tork wrote: » In this case I was talking about people going to cafes and not practicing social distancing.Mask wearers are just cranks who look ridiculous, right?
polesheep wrote: » Nope. Mask wearers are people who have decided that mask wearing is necessary. I have no problem with them wearing a mask.
Living Off The Splash wrote: » Saw an elderly couple walking through Stillorgan Shopping Centre yesterday. She was wearing a mask. He was walking along beside her with no mask. I am trying to figure out the logic of this?
seamus wrote: » She was wearing a mask because she wanted to. He refused to wear a mask because he's stubborn. At the start of all this, my Ma had to argue with my Da about wearing gloves and distancing. Eventually he agreed to wear gloves while pumping petrol. He wore one glove, and pumped the petrol with his ungloved hand. He did cop on a lot more though as it became clear this was a pandemic and not just another virus scare.Many aulfellas are just stubborn aul feckers who will refuse to do something specifically because someone told them they had to.
iPaddyM wrote: No. Because I believe the whole thing is a scam.
ShooterSF wrote: Visors mean customers who rely on lip reading can still user the shop. It's more accessibility friendly imo.
McGiver wrote: » That's not the point. The point is that they're useless.
mike_ie wrote: » Mod: You wear a face shield - great. Let's move on, shall we?
