timsey tiger wrote: » Benefits - ? Negatives - addiction, lung cancer, mental health issues, ...
Niner leprauchan wrote: » Ok, first off, let's get the myth out of the way. Legalising won't impact the drink industry. If people want to drink, they drink. If people want to smoke, they already do. Legalising will not remove it from criminals. Importing, licensing, taxing and regulating costs money. The Criminals won't worry about that so will stay in business. Cigarettes and alcohol are still smuggled and sold illegally. It will be the same. Legalising will save Garda and customs time and effort. Well no. Licensing and regulation takes both money and time. It may become more cost neutral but it won't reduce it. Crimes will still exist as well. If anything I would suggest Gardai and customs would spend more time on the issue. Now that's out of the way. You won't stop people smoking. Even in countries with very strict drug laws and pretty easy laws overall, drugs are big business. At least if we give people a legal option, it's safer for them to not interact with Criminals and the product may well prove healthier. May not as well but I suspect it will. The one caveat would be that being in possession of unlicensed weed carried penalties. I think society as a whole needs to be met halfway on this one. It's ridiculous how many excuses you hear from smokers that buy on Moore street. Those sellers aren't saints people. They are Criminals who work for bigger and far nastier people as well.
snotboogie wrote: » If it was legal it would not be imported, it would be grown locally. You'd be cutting out 90% of the supply chain costs and the cost of seizures. Unless there was incredible taxes put on it would most likely be cheaper when legal.
Jet Black wrote: » It's not addictive* It doesn't cause lung cancer (doesn't have to be smoked) Mental health benefits? *Anything can be addictive. It's nowhere near addictive as the other legal drugs.
timsey tiger wrote: » * incoherent thoughts, must be weed induced reasoning. Mental health benefits, just like the benefits of radium I'd say. Those arguments about the economic benefits of weed production are the exact same as for tobacco, I think the rest of society will tell the weed industry to f**k off when the true costs become apparent in 20 years. It also smells.
Jet Black wrote: It's not addictive* It doesn't cause lung cancer (doesn't have to be smoked) Mental health benefits?
timsey tiger wrote: » It also smells.
Gradius wrote: » Well the other bloke disappeared. My point is that the opinion of a person who's number one priority is getting stoned should not be trusted when they start bleating about all these supposed benefits for others. All these things like getting rid of criminality associated with drugs...its not exactly stopping them now, is it? It's not their priority now, is it? They don't care. It would be nice for them to have a guilt-free drug, but when it comes to the shove, it doesn't matter to them anyway. Talking out of their hole, in other words.
TuringBot47 wrote: » And how many doped out potheads are a positive influence on society? Does it help them to work and contribute to society, or does it just mean they can be lazy nobodies drugged out on their sofa? Of course it's a gateway drug. They get their weed from drug dealers, you don't think they try upselling? I'd a brother-in-law... never harmed a soul, but loved his weed. Out of employment more than he was in it. Got a call he was found dead on his sofa. I still remember the roars of his mother as his body was brought into their sitting room before the funeral. These days, alcohol would be considered a drug and banned. But too ingrained in society. Decriminalising drugs only helps the useless losers that use them, certainly does absolutely no good for the decent people who contribute to society.
maccored wrote: Better than alcohol and not as harmful.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Tis is me bollocks
ladystardust wrote: » Only if its smoked. And even then, cigarette smoke smells horrific also. Society hasnt told big tobacco to eff off just yet. Marijuana is Just another choice of mood altering substance. Like tobacco, alcohol, coffee, caffeine. And to be fair THC is fairly benign compared to tobacco and alcohol
snotboogie wrote: » Tax Revenue, freeing up Garda and customs time to work on actual crimes, an alternative less dangerous legal drug than alcohol, freeing up jails and courts by not prosecuting non violent criminals, giving young men who would otherwise have a criminal record a proper chance in life by not prosecuting them for a harmless crime.
CrabRevolution wrote: » While I'm indifferent to legalisation, nobody is in jail for smoking cannabis so this is nonsense.
Gooey Looey wrote: » Care to back that up with some dangers! 3 people a day die from alcohol in this country
Wanderer78 wrote: » yup, ive seen it used as a gateway drug, i know people that have a weed addiction, including family members, and their mental state is not good, long term unemployment, paranoid ideation and other complex behavioral problems, more than likely induced from a lifetime use of weed and other drugs, but particularly weed. it really does a lot of harm, maybe as harmful as alcohol
[Deleted User] wrote: » We have enough people off their heads already on alcohol and heaven knows what else. As a nation we have more than our share of mental illness, addiction issues, we have too many vulnerabilities. I know for a start cannabis does not suit me personally, had very bad reaction to the stuff and never took the stuff again. And I’d be more than worried about people who are so anxious and eager to gain access to cannabis or anything mind altering-they are probably the ones who need to avoid them. I don’t want to encounter any more people off their heads particularly whilst driving a vehicle.
Gooey Looey wrote: » If their mental state is poor they shouldn't be self medicating with cannabis, alcohol or any other drug. I know plenty of precessionals who partake from time to time who live normal healthy professional working lives.
CrankyHaus wrote: » Excellent point. Prohibition may have made sense decades ago, when the drug was not available everywhere. But that time is long passed. IME alcohol is far more of a gateway drug. People are far more likely to make stupid choices and try another drug after a rake of pints than they are after smoking a joint. Cannabis is far from harmless, and the OTT advocates of it as a miracle solution for everything are eejits, but the most sensible way to manage its harm is legalisation.
kowloonkev wrote: » Never understand the people saying that alcohol is as bad so cannabis should be legal. Surely the logical thinking would be the banning of alcohol. But ultimately the potheads want their alcohol too. They're fooling nobody except themselves.
CrankyHaus wrote: » Banning alcohol has been tried before. It was a disaster. The logical thing would be making public policy based on realism rather than childish absolutism.