nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

mark of the beast

harrylittle

Mod: moved from Christianity june 11 2020

On the late late show last friday it had a guy with a chip in his right hand and I immediatly thought of revelation 13 . This is probably the prelude to the mark of the beast as stated 2000 years ago in the bible that would happen in the end of days.

"The second beast was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that the image could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed. 16 It also forced all people, great and small, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hands or on their foreheads, 17 so that they could not buy or sell unless they had the mark, which is the name of the beast or the number of its name."

"A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: “If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, 10 they, too, will drink the wine of God’s fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. They will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. 11 And the smoke of their torment will rise for ever and ever. There will be no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and its image, or for anyone who receives the mark of its name."

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

pauldla

one world order wrote: »

We have free will to accept God or reject him.

Free will, coupled with geographic determinism

:pac:

Timberrrrrrrr

one world order wrote: »

We have free will to accept God or reject him.

Even people who have never heard of him?

The J Stands for Jay

pearcider wrote: »

There is a very specific claim at stake here. That is the mark of the beast that nobody on the Earth may buy and sell without this mark. There is absolutely no way this could be possible up until quite recently as we had no SWIFT and no smart phones and no satellites. Cut it any way you wish but this is a deeply disturbing fact to a believer such as myself.

SWIFT has been on the go since 1973, satellites since 1957. Where does the mark of the beast come into it?

Hoop66

When the religion loopers and the conspiraloons get together, it's really quite something.

Dohnjoe

Hoop66 wrote: »

When the religion loopers and the conspiraloons get together, it's really quite something.

Interesting how they are so similar, individuals with fringe beliefs they can't support, desperately seeking any form of validation

pearcider

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Interesting how they are so similar, individuals with fringe beliefs they can't support, desperately seeking any form of validation

You’re the only desperate poster in here. Desperately dull I mean.

pearcider

McGaggs wrote: »

SWIFT has been on the go since 1973, satellites since 1957. Where does the mark of the beast come into it?

Another dullard. That is recent history when compared with two thousand years. Are you really that obtuse or were you just desperate to post anything?

pearcider

Hoop66 wrote: »

When the religion loopers and the conspiraloons get together, it's really quite something.

Thanks for that contribution you simpleton.

[Deleted User]

And now, rather than defend the conspiracy, we've entered the phase where the conspiracy theorist just insults people who disagrees with them.

pearcider

King Mob wrote: »

And now, rather than defend the conspiracy, we've entered the phase where the conspiracy theorist just insults people who disagrees with them.

If you can’t take it don’t dish it out.

[Deleted User]

pearcider wrote: »

If you can’t take it don’t dish it out.

No one is insulting you. We're just asking you difficult questions about about your theory that you can't address.

This is understandable frustrating for you. However, rather than lash out, maybe you should consider why you doing so and why you can't address the points made?

Maybe you're wrong?
Is that possible?

pearcider

King Mob wrote: »

No one is insulting you. We're just asking you difficult questions about about your theory that you can't address.

This is understandable frustrating for you. However, rather than lash out, maybe you should consider why you doing so and why you can't address the points made?

Maybe you're wrong?
Is that possible?

How is calling someone a religious looper not an insult?

SuperGrover

Remember when barcodes were the mark of the beast?

Maybe, just maybe, people writing stuff millennia in the past couldn't actually see into the future?

No?

quickbeam

Mod: pearcider taking a little holiday from here.

The J Stands for Jay

pearcider wrote: »

Another dullard. That is recent history when compared with two thousand years. Are you really that obtuse or were you just desperate to post anything?

No, the main point of my post was to ask where do you see the mark of the beast in this? Your posts on this seemed to be coming from the perspective of changes in technology over a human lifespan, hence the dates I gave. And what relevance is 200 years to the Bible? It covers a much longer period than that.

4068ac1elhodqr

SuperGrover wrote: »

Remember when barcodes were the mark of the beast?

Unless you're calling 750gms of retail Corn Flakes a beasty-evil...
...nope.

But do try to think of the last time folks got serial numbers lashed onto their arms, circa mid-century.

[Deleted User]

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

Unless you're calling 750gms of retail Corn Flakes a beasty-evil...
...nope.

But do try to think of the last time folks got serial numbers lashed onto their arms, circa mid-century.

Again, people made the exact same claims you do now only about barcodes.

They were wrong then.
It was a ridiculous theory fueled by paranoid fringe religious beliefs.

You've not shown that your claims are any different.

4068ac1elhodqr

King Mob wrote: »

Again, 'people' made the exact same claims you do now only about barcodes.

Lol, 'people', so mysterious non cited people, made some claims, some time ago, apparently.

Has there even been a proposed program (ever) to lash barcodes onto people? Nope.

Fact is, QDT now have proof of concept after $millions of Gate's funding at the best minds over at Gate's MIT team, with the purpose, intent and patent to be an intricrate part of a mass vaccine program.

These are the best case solution, proposed to the global issue of vaccine 'immunity certificates'.

Unless they find a better solution (don't say mobile bluetooth, cas that would be funny, funny), as it stands this is the most likely solution for the 7bn vaccines <12/18mths.

[Deleted User]

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

Lol, 'people', so mysterious non cited people, made some claims, some time ago, apparently.

Yes they did.
Are you denying that happened?

And yes, these people also had spurious conspiracy theories to back up their claims about barcodes. Yours are exactly the same.

You also forget that while what you point to are plans and pilot programs, barcodes became used worldwide and they are used in almost all small purchases.

I don't think you can buy or sell anything without scanning a barcode at some point.

The barcode is a better fit for the mark of the beast anyhow as it actually fits the description in the bible, while yours doesn't at all.

Timberrrrrrrr

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

Lol, 'people', so mysterious non cited people, made some claims, some time ago, apparently.

Has there even been a proposed program (ever) to lash barcodes onto people? Nope.

Fact is, QDT now have proof of concept after $millions of Gate's funding at the best minds over at Gate's MIT team, with the purpose, intent and patent to be an intricrate part of a mass vaccine program.

These are the best case solution, proposed to the global issue of vaccine 'immunity certificates'.

Unless they find a better solution (don't say mobile bluetooth, cas that would be funny, funny), as it stands this is the most likely solution for the 7bn vaccines <12/18mths.

Here you go

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.wired.com/2012/12/upc-mark-of-the-beast/amp

Dohnjoe

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

Lol, 'people', so mysterious non cited people, made some claims, some time ago, apparently.

Barcodes
https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=65924490

ID
https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055382334

RFID
https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=57780439

Cashless
https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055225833

Microchips
https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2055819254

Same hysteria, same silly arguments, just repackaged every time new tech comes out. Note all the "mark of the beast" references.

4068ac1elhodqr

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Here you go

So no actual program, no one actually getting these retail codes as embodiments, just one journalists commentary, cool stuff.

If anything it does show the 666 signature common through technologies, control systems, processors, DRAM base frequencies, other systems of data capture, storing, and so on.

More recently the 666 signature springs up in MSPatent names and the US TRACE Act, and the cheerful Lucifer-esq QDT enzymne. Think www in hebrew or some ancient lingo is linked 666. Still all these are just novelty asides, and just subtle signatures in the greater scheme of things.

The important thing is 666 is a man-made or 'synthetic' number usually for systems of 'control', information processing, and order. It has no real place in nature.

Natures own (golden) number equivalent would be 1 : 61803399 (or 1.618), as seen in many creations from tiny sea shells, to distant interstellar galaxies.

4068ac1elhodqr

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Same hysteria, same silly arguments, just repackaged every time new tech comes out. Note all the "mark of the beast" references.

Struth you must be bored digging about the boards, have you not any other hobbies?

Think there was a new CT today on some other topic, how come you're not all over it? Is the pager broken?

Anyway sunshine and fresh air beckons now, sure give it try Dohnny Joe, you might even like it!

[Deleted User]

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

So no actual program, no one actually getting these retail codes as embodiments, just one journalists commentary, cool stuff.

But there was a program. barcodes are used all over the world to buy and sell things to the point that you can't buy anything without a barcode these days.

This fits the description in the bible while your mark of the beast doesn't.

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

If anything it does show the 666 signature common through technologies, control systems, processors, DRAM base frequencies, other systems of data capture, storing, and so on.

More recently the 666 signature springs up in MSPatent names and the US TRACE Act, and the cheerful Lucifer-esq QDT enzymne. Think www in hebrew or some ancient lingo is linked 666. Still all these are just novelty asides, and just subtle signatures in the greater scheme of things.

The important thing is 666 is a man-made or 'synthetic' number usually for systems of 'control', information processing, and order. It has no real place in nature.

Natures own (golden) number equivalent would be 1 : 61803399 (or 1.618), as seen in many creations from tiny sea shells, to distant interstellar galaxies.

This is all meaningless waffle.

Dohnjoe

Callie Billions Author wrote: »

Struth you must be bored digging about the boards, have you not any other hobbies?

Think there was a new CT today on some other topic, how come you're not all over it? Is the pager broken?

Anyway sunshine and fresh air beckons now, sure give it try Dohnny Joe, you might even like it!

Make same comment about no hobbies and sunlight ✓
Deliberately misspell the username ✓
Doesn't address any points ✓
Usual whataboutery ✓

[Deleted User]

Dohnjoe wrote: »

Make same comment about no hobbies and sunlight ✓

Deliberately misspell the username ✓

Doesn't address any points ✓

Usual whataboutery ✓

It might become funny on the 17th time he uses the same witty joke.

quickbeam

Mod: closing as this is covering the same ground as the Digital ID's thread.