Beasty wrote: » It's not just the elderly. However this Is a relatively minor issue in the context of this virus and we all are having to adjust to doing things differently.
JP Liz V1 wrote: » What does folks without cards do, a lot older do not have cards or want to use over bank charges, now places want contactless payments
biko wrote: » I have not seen any shop reject cash yet. Card is just preferred.
double jobbing wrote: » Using a card for payment is nothing short of demeaning
Dial Hard wrote: » You're going to have to explain that one for those of us in the cheap seats...
WashYourHands wrote: » (I use card nearly exclusively) It's a loss of privacy. Facebook was able to tell me how many time I had used my Revolut card/app (+200 times). Unfortunately it didn't provide more information than that so I don't know what exact information was shared. That doesn't happen with cash.
Heroditas wrote: » Also how it's the fastest most efficient way... ???
TheChizler wrote: » Is all the time spent finding and queueing for an ATM, putting in your pin, navigating the menu, and waiting for it to process time well spent?
With Google Pay I often have the transaction completed within a few seconds of the cashier running up the total.
double jobbing wrote: » But not faster than by using cash. Never can be never will be.
double jobbing wrote: » Yes. But not faster than by using cash. Never can be never will be.
double jobbing wrote: » Just feels wrong. I bought a hoodie today, 55 quid. Had I been carrying cash, which I always was prior to this craic, I'd have 55 quid in my hand. Transaction done in under 7 seconds with receipt. If it was a transaction where I wouldn't want a receipt, transaction done and leaving till in under 3 seconds. Unfortunately I've become so accustomed to not using ATM's I went into the shop with no cash on me, plain forgot to go. Time taken to fire up the machine, enter PIN, be approved- probably 20 plus seconds. Doing something that takes up to 8 times longer every day for 50 years until the day you die eventually accumulates into a lot of lost personal time. It's a hateful method.
Emmersonn wrote: » It is not a minor matter if you have not got a card.
phormium wrote: » I have only come across one shop, a petrol station convenience store that will only take contactless, all others I have used would prefer contactless but will take cash.
Creamy Goodness wrote: » Don’t use Revolut then they include the Facebook SDK’s so that you can log in and invite friends pay friends etc.. My “traditional” bank doesn’t include Facebook SDK’s or geo locates my phone with a purchase I do in a shop unless I use Apple Pay. I’d go as far as to say if you want your privacy Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp should be deleted off your phone. I don’t get the elderly thing either. Both my parents are in their mid 70’s, they only use cash when trades people are involved. Don’t get me wrong I get the appeal of cash but I also get the greater appeal and especially the hygiene factor of cards/phones/etc. in a pandemic.
WashYourHands wrote: » I was answering a question. Not debating the merits of using Revolut vs traditional banks. Your traditional bank probably charges for transactions. That's another win for using cash.
thelad95 wrote: » Since retail has re-opened, I've been to multiple shops that are not taking cash and honestly I think they'll keep it that way long term. IKEA, DID electrical, Woodies, Power City, Curry's all not taking cash.
gipi wrote: » My sister went to a Boots chemist a few weeks ago and they refused to accept cash. She doesn't have a card of any type, (afaik she doesn't even have a current account!), so she had to leave without her purchases.
corsav6 wrote: I dunno, march in and slam a €20 on the counter while shouting "pump number 2 love" is about as fast as a transaction can be done
[Deleted User] wrote: » Unsure if there's any truth to it, but a cashier in Woodies was saying that they can't say no to cash as they're an Irish company, and it's only UK companies etc. that can say no to it.