Redgirl82 wrote: » It's called movements. Like #MeToo that people associate themselves with and promote so it gets recognition. You want to promote a group of racist. That your decision. Not sure why boards is allowing that? to be it would be against the charter and not something they would want to be associated with.
Redgirl82 wrote: » What’s a vulture fund Bowie?
McMurphy wrote: » It is best to keep quiet about things you know nothing about, never mind try and turn it back and imply the other person is the idiot "for not understanding" how things work.
Bowie wrote: » They are private entities Fine Gael throws tax payer money at that make profits as the housing crisis worsens.
Bowie wrote: » You falsely claimed you knew a short while ago. Anyway... They are private entities Fine Gael throws tax payer money at that make profits as the housing crisis worsens. Instead of building social and affordable housing in any great numbers FG engage in 25 year leases and other private rentals, as discussed, for everyone needing it including those that might be in arrears.
FrancieBrady wrote: » :D It's a group of racists now? So if somebody went on the #metoo group and said 'women are inferior'...#metoo would be a group of male chauvinists? You have no clue about how twitter works, do you?
atticu wrote: » This is good advice, and, don’t get me wrong here, I am not telling you what to do... But, in my honesty opinion, you should read your own advice and try and follow it. There have been a few times on these boards where you have not followed your own advice, and we all know how that ended.
Redgirl82 wrote: » Sorry, what would you like to call them?
efanton wrote: » you do understand the term racist and what it means? racist /ˈreɪsɪst/ noun a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another. So unless Leo is not Irish (which is not true), or people discriminate against him because of his Indian heritage (which has not happened), it would be totally impossible for anyone here to even be considered racist no matter what they say about him. They might say a lot of unflattering things about him, they might call him a liar for instance (which has been proven in Dail record), but none of them would be racist remarks.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-dvmTm6whw ,
FrancieBrady wrote: » What they are...a collection of differing opinions on the subject of the hashtag. It isn't a 'group' in the sense that it acts or contains the thoughts of a homogenous group. You just revealed you don't know what you are talking about and keep digging.
Redgirl82 wrote: » So this is not racism? (person details removed) Shows what happens when you let a non irish person run Ireland #notmytaoiseach If not then what would you call it?
FrancieBrady wrote: » It's a lie. Do you not see that one as well? Concentrate on the 'non Irish person' bit. Leo is Irish.
Redgirl82 wrote: » Francie, I didn’t reveal anything apart from my disgust at what those people said. You are the one going around promoting it.
Redgirl82 wrote: » Are you actually serious? You are actually defending this statement? Shows what happens when you let a non irish person run Ireland #notmytaoiseach
Deleted User wrote: » Link.this tweet.....this could be like your imaginary 16 year old,the other day? Ive read last 80 or so tweets and the top 30 or tweets.....this isnt the sentiment atal.....your misrepresenting,what is being said (Twitter deosnt have a sort by controversial option)
FrancieBrady wrote: » Leo is NOT a 'non Irish person' He is as Irish as you and me. It is false/a lie to say any different.
Deleted User wrote: » This post is a thing of beauty
Redgirl82 wrote: » Find it yourself....
FrancieBrady wrote: » :D I didn't read many of them, I just thought it relevant to say that two twitter hashtags, critical of FG were trending. Seemingly I am now promoting 'racist groups on Twitter'. Interesting that a good long trawl had to be done to find that tweet redgirl is outraging about.
Redgirl82 wrote: » No, you just defended racism on here. Put a smiley face on that
Deleted User wrote: » Imo....its like your imaginary 16 year old Its not there,i didnt find a single tweet,of a racist nature that your describing under that hashtag.....tbh i was suprised,there wasnt any Your blowing smoke mate
Redgirl82 wrote: » How many will times will you post about an imaginary 16 year old?
You can’t even use the shift or caps lock key, or to type a comprehendible sentence. Finding a tweet was always going to be a task too far for you.
Deleted User wrote: » Unlikely to be as many as you.....37 posts iirc was yours wailing about it I copied and pasted the supposed tweet off your post,and a 2 year old tweet (from one of gemma odoherty supporter types),unrelated to the hashtag came up?
FrancieBrady wrote: » What???? Where was that? You better answer this time, as I have no intention of being accused of defending racism.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The easy thing to do would be to post a link to the tweet, I would have thought. Most users of Twitter do that here.
Redgirl82 wrote: » So threatening people now as well?
Redgirl82 wrote: » Where in the charter does it say I have to provide a source? It’s your hashtag, off you go!!!