CinemaGuy45 wrote: » https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8221495/Elderly-man-shocks-shoppers-browses-supermarket-aisles-wearing-SANITARY-TOWEL-mask.html
Boggles wrote: » They asked for clarification nearly 2 months ago, basically should they be wearing masks or not, and if not, why not. I guess they finally got their answer.
Wearing a mask can significantly reduce coronavirus transmission, study on hamsters claims Published Tue, May 19 2020 The study was released Sunday by the department of microbiology at The University of Hong Kong. Local media reports stated it will be published in the Clinical Infectious Diseases medical journal, suggesting it is yet to be peer reviewed. Thomas Tolstrup As the debate over the effectiveness of wearing masks during a pandemic continues, a new study gives weight to arguments by medical professionals and government leaders that wearing a mask does indeed reduce virus transmission — and dramatically so. Experiments by a team in Hong Kong found that the coronavirus’ transmission rate via respiratory droplets or airborne particles dropped by as much as 75% when surgical masks were used. “The findings implied to the world and the public is that the effectiveness of mask-wearing against the coronavirus pandemic is huge,” Dr. Yuen Kwok-yung, a leading microbiologist from Hong Kong University who helped discover the SARS virus in 2003, said Sunday.
Coralcoras wrote: » What is you experience with mask uptake in your area? My eyes 1/15 at Tesco Westport. I have a feeling they won’t take off unless respected individuals in government lead the way.
brendanwalsh wrote: » Where are most people sourcing their FFP2 / FFP3 grade masks and filters ?
brendanwalsh wrote: » Where are most people sourcing their FFP2 / FFP3 grade masks and filters ? I got some from Hong Kong a few weeks ago but now looking to reload. How many of you are wearing full or half faced respirators.?
standardg60 wrote: » Jesus do you or anyone you know have the virus? I don't. Would you rather be in the UK? Leave your own political prejudice in your head and acknowledge a job well done. The CMO has been dealing with politically motivated idiots (as most politicians are). Move to a country with one of the differing CMO's if you're that convinced and see how you get on.
ShineOn7 wrote: » Thoughts on these? https://www.inishpharmacy.com/p/biobase-3-ply-disposable-face-masks-bulk-box-50-pack/biobase-50 A box of 50 for 100 euros. I was going to get them for the parents But do they really offer anything more than the box of 50 for 45 euros in Aldi (or is it Lidl) ?
Away With The Fairies wrote: » I don't understand people wearing gloves and not masks, especially after the advice to wear masks. The main way of transmission is through respiratory droplets. How will gloves protect people?
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Good point. Politicians could give guidance by wearing them.
Billgirlylegs wrote: » Some of the stuff here is Comedy Gold. This contribution is almost as good as hamsters wearing facemasks or a Risk Averse person standing in a pretty big queue at the ATM. Which of our highly respected politicians would you think people will unquestioningly copy?
Seanergy wrote: » This thread has already been bombed with glove talk enough, maybe those interested in talking gloves should do so in PPE thread or start a gloves thread!
Boggles wrote: » 99% of commuters 'ignoring advice' on face masks according to transport workers Add to the fact large swathes of people are now acting like there is no pandemic, it will be a fúcking miracle if this thing doesn't flair up again in the next 6 weeks.
Away With The Fairies wrote: » It's not a surprise when masks/coverings aren't mandatory.