Doctor Jimbob wrote: » Probably because in plenty of places on the continent people literally couldn't leave there homes while geniuses on here were harping on about a police state (despite having less strict restrictions than many places) and bragging about how the lockdown ended for them on a random date that suited them.
ixoy wrote: » Are we not testing more? So of course, if we do, we'll find more when we've reduced the criteria for testing. These sorts of cases were always there, just hadn't met the criteria to be eligible before.
is_that_so wrote: » What precise law can they use to do this?
road_high wrote: » How the fcuk are we doing so poorly?
Draconian stay-at-home orders and shutting all non-essential businesses had little effect on fighting coronavirus in Europe, according to a study. But the same scientists discovered closing schools and banning all mass gatherings did work in halting outbreaks across the continent. University of East Anglia researchers now say relaxing the stay-at-home policy and letting some businesses reopen could be the UK's first step to easing lockdown. The findings throw into question whether Britain's total lockdown - announced on March 23 - was necessary. Other top scientists have claimed Britain's COVID-19 crisis peaked and started to decline before lockdown began, arguing that Number 10's drastic policy to shut the UK down was wrong. It comes after Boris Johnson yesterday confirmed that strict rules imposed under the six-week coronavirus lockdown will start to be eased on Monday.
tobefrank321 wrote: » We can't close the borders. We can't stop people coming from NI. We can't stop NI people flying en masse to London or returning and then heading south for a day trip or round of golf. We can't stop Travellers coming from London for large gatherings. At what stage does the penny drop that we could remain in this half arsed farcical "lockdown" infinitely and numbers will remain relatively high. You either go full lockdown or don't bother and go for a more targeted approach.
road_high wrote: » Seriously depressing reading last night the increased figures here- while dropping on the Continent and life getting back to normal. WTF are we at?
Discokiiid wrote: » What do we think about shopping centres? The likes of normal stores? River island , JD Etc?
Pitch n Putt wrote: » No point waiting for smaller daily case load if that’s what they’re doing The constant change in testing criteria will mean that numbers are going to stay at similar levels or increase. Simple maths will say the more u test the more likely you are to get positive results. Active cases is where the focus should be. That’s dependant on good testing system and quick results turn around. Again another problem for us. We can’t progress to the CMO/HSE and NPHET plan if they can’t get these sorted and they’ve had 8 weeks already but we live on in lockdown with the promise of 100k tests per week If the only done 30000 tests with max 48 hr results turn around it would be far more beneficial than talking rubbish about numbers that will never be efficiently achieved.
road_high wrote: » Seriously depressing reading last night the increased figures here- while dropping on the Continent and life getting back to normal. WTF are we at? The lockdown here has been strict, well supported and very well adhered to. Nothing much is open. How the fcuk are we doing so poorly?
is_that_so wrote: » CMO seems to be looking for signs of low hospital and ICU admissions. They also want to see a much smaller daily new case load. I don't know what that is and I can't see him ever giving a number just being encouraged, hopeful or concerned. It's being paid for by the surplus and the money that had already been borrowed. Once that's exhausted we'll get more and there will be a lot of extremely cheap money about for that.
mandrake04 wrote: » https://www.independent.ie/world-news/coronavirus/passengers-refusing-to-give-details-of-plans-for-quarantine-39187275.html?fbclid=IwAR0XAAD18WtPUZhKczCh4-hZnNHsmdXPj6EwiQ5Yf44LoKgWSuJBcyqq-IQ This is the problem, the sooner the government puts people in forced Isolation the better, maybe give them a bit of kicking to ensure they dont get itchy feet
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Ahhh, another day in lockdown. So, rangers in Wicklow Mountains National Park have been told to stay at home due to social distancing. They have the most isolated job on the planet as you can appreciate, wondering around the forest by themselves. Here, we will be laughed at for many years to come with our nonsense approach. News update - German Bundesliga will resume May 15th (1 week from now). 198 players will take to the pitch and break all social distancing rules Simon Harris wishes for for about 90 minutes.
tobefrank321 wrote: » In the year 2025, when we are all in rags and starving, you'll still have the curtain twitchers ringing the gardai about groups of young men breaking the lockdown. This appears to be the direction we are now headed. And we'll still have incompetence dealing with nursing homes. I'm all for lockdowns except when those who brought in the lockdown don't know what they are doing and have no credible exit strategy people can buy in to.
Deleted User wrote: » Some people here would love that. Put up a wall around the country. No-one in or out. Lockdown for weeks more and suppress the virus at all costs, with zero consideration given to the longer term impact. Too many people think like this for a more ambitious release of restrictions to be a political runner. But once the £350 payment is cut in half, and sitting on your arse at home is no longer possible, I suspect that we will see the appetite for a more rapid release of restrictions shift quite rapidly
CruelSummer wrote: » AIB tumbles a further 10pc as investors run scared of Irish banks - article in today’s Irish Independent. Why are we destroying our lives? Many more than the virus will... I see some countries have also formed a ‘travel alliance’, Germany and other neighbours. Could also include Australia and New Zealand. We are left out cold...the government are useless at the moment. If Eamon Ryan doesn’t agree to government in the next week, off to the polls with us.
CruelSummer wrote: » I see some countries have also formed a ‘travel alliance’, Germany and other neighbours. Could also include Australia and New Zealand. We are left out cold...the government are useless at the moment. If Eamon Ryan doesn’t agree to government in the next week, off to the polls with us.
easypazz wrote: » You forgot No. 11 11. There has been a sharp drop in cancer referrals since the onset of Covid-19 pandemic, this is one of many areas where regular medical intervention has been impacted. The government is concerned about secondary mortality as a result of restrictions.
‘When it comes to cancer, early detection is key and can be the difference between life or death in some cases. ‘That’s why it’s so important people contact their GP immediately if they notice potential cancer symptoms like a lump, bleeding, weight loss or fatigue. ‘Despite COVID-19 we have been assured that GPs are there for anyone who needs them and urgent cancer services are continuing to operate.’ At the end of March, the Government announced that public healthcare capacity will increase by 17% through an agreement with the Private Hospital Association.
_Kaiser_ wrote: » ... and as long as the general public are willing to support and buy in to the measures. Something that, beyond the small corner that is boards.ie, seems to be lessening by the day as people weigh up the longer term impacts to themselves and their families. Just wait till the Government are forced to reduce the €350 because the money's run out. Any remaining support will drop like a stone.
easypazz wrote: » They can only prolong things as long as somebody is willing to keep giving us money.