Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Pretty interesting. Just googled "Denmark lifting restrictions", 9/10 top results from google are over 2 weeks old. They've been lifting restrictions since 14th of April. Surely if there is a spike in cases or deaths from their reckless approach of not staying at home for further 3 months we would hear about that? Kinda feel like - Denmark opens up & does ok, no news coverage. UK reports 400 more deaths - all over the news. Could the "save the 70 year olds" brigade please enlighten me, are Denmark people much healthier than here? or is covid19 much weaker in Denmark?
mollser wrote: » This is kind of the exact time that kids use the parks though! They are generally doing home school from 9 - 12 (generally with rte2's show from 11 to 12), then go out for air in the afternoon! Better to have the parks from 9 to 11 for the over 70's ffs
NIMAN wrote: » News tends to report the negative rather than the positive.....especially Irish news.
gmisk wrote: » If they are finished at 12....go out at 12...that's a big gap til 130.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Pubs not a business? Should open at the same time as restaurants. With the same rules - social distancing enabled by seating plan, capacity based on seats available and table service only. Looking forward to reserving my favourite table at the local pub.
bloodless_coup wrote: » Great to see, life moving on and leaving the doomsdayers lock up in their houses wearing tinfoil hats.
mollser wrote: » tends to be when they have their lunch though! It's also about filling the day for the kids. They have been fkd over in this much more than any other group, and now the over 70's have a license to revert to glowering at them. Sick of this sh!t.
Penfailed wrote: » To what benefit...if there's no work going on?
iamwhoiam wrote: » Bring a picnic lunch to the park at 12 . Or go at 3:30 when it nice and quiet . And I beg your pardon but why would you think over 70,s would glower at your kids ? The vast majority are grandparents who adore kids
gmisk wrote: » The time picked seemed a tad odd alright in Spain they picked 10-12 for over 70s. It's also only guidance in Dublin I really doubt it will be enforced in any way at all.
iamwhoiam wrote: » I think maybe the idea behind it was because the shops have elderly hours between 9-12 . Although I do agree that possibly the morning would be more suitable for the park times
mollser wrote: » You clearly haven't been out with kids over the last 7 weeks Not so bad the last few weeks but at the start, when they were considered vectors and superspreaders, it was awful!
easypazz wrote: » Its nothing short of criminal now the damage that is being done with this kick the can down the road plan. Compared to the time frames in most other places we are almost alone as a complete outlier.
gmisk wrote: » Ah your could be right, that might be the logic. But surely they shouldn't be shopping that much? I know my folks who are just under 70 do one huge shop a week.
iamwhoiam wrote: » Yeh . I do one big shop once a week too . No need to go any more often . It does seem a bit odd to pick a time when kids are more likely to be out I will be going walking in a park early as I think it’s probably best when the families are not yet out
Kermit.de.frog wrote: » Do you realise how rediculous you are all going to look behaving the way you are if/when the second wave occurs and the health system ends up overwhelmed and a more comprehensive lock down needs to be put in place? It's just this reckless, selfish and belligerent attitude from the handful of posters here could really come back to bite you. It's not a good place to be psychologically in my opinion when this blows up again in our faces. However, I endorse the government's sensible and prudent approach. We need to do everything we can to avoid the worst consequences of the next wave of the virus. The measures are entirely appropriate, the time line is great and the vast majority of right thinking people in this country fully accept it is the correct way forward. Work with science, not belief. It will all work out better in the end :cool:
Fann Linn wrote: » According to data presented to Govt there is no clamour from the public for the lifting of restrictions and its just a vocal minority making that demand an ESRI report states in today's Times.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » There is work going on. There are plenty of barbers who provide a safe haircut, make a living wage and contribute to society. And then there are people who collect 350 eur per week and think that pubs should not be allowed to re open as how could they possibly do social distancing there.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Kermit could we work with facts please instead of science? Science predicted 65,000 dead from Swine flu in UK, 392 died. So, pass. Ok so Denmark, Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, Norway, Finland have all opened up their economies, schools opened since 14th of April in Denmark, barbers 21st of April. Where are those spikes? where is the 2nd wave?? Why are thousands of people not dying in those countries? Why is Bundesliga going to play its games on 16th of May, are they mad? Ohhh the dreaded 2nd wave, must be applicable in Ireland only?
JPCN1 wrote: » According to Martin Wall also in Today's Irish Times... "This means there are about 1.23 million workers relying on State support for all or part of their income" That is beyond bleak... even if we get many of them back to work with the promised State loans the fact that tourism sector has missed a summer means a great many will be non viable.
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Kermit could we work with facts please instead of science? Science predicted 65,000 dead from Swine flu in UK, 392 died. So, pass. Ok so Denmark, Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, Norway, Finland have all opened up their economies, schools opened since 14th of April in Denmark, barbers 21st of April. Where are those spikes? where is the 2nd wave?? Why are thousands of people not dying in those countries? Why is Bundesliga going to play its games on 16th of May, are they mad?Ohhh the dreaded 2nd wave, must be applicable in Ireland only?
Ginger n Lemon wrote: » Youve pointed out that the deaths in this country are low because of lockdown restrictions. I am unsure of this, because there is a country out there with nearly identical death rate but with no lockdown restrictions. Thats the "incorrect part". There is another country out there too, Belarus, no lockdown, less than 200 deaths, population 9.5m. its an unpopular country I admit, but it exists, and videos of 1000 + body bags on the streets in Belarus are not exactly circulating are they...
jmayo wrote: » Aren't you being a bit disingenuous when you don't give the full picture about the Bundesliga supposedly going to play their matches. You don't mention they are in empty stadiums, may involve a ban on players celebrataing together and even rumour they may have to wear masks ? In fact 10 people linked to top two tiers have been confirmed with covid19 this week.
hmmm wrote: » Don't laugh now, but opening the pubs would be easier if they didn't serve alcohol, or limited customers in some way. Pissed people staggering into toilets and generally unable to be physically distant does not sound like a good place to start to relax restrictions.
jmayo wrote: » Aren't you being a bit disingenuous when you don't give the full picture about the Bundesliga supposedly going to play their matches.