DubInMeath wrote: » You might want to recheck your facts on that, non essential businesses were closed by order and travel limited to medical and food shopping, an allowance for walking the dog also. Some regular posters on here are ex pats living over there and have been complaining about the lockdown and comparing the Spanish police to fascists due to their handling of the lockdown.
kippy wrote: » I've wasted enough of my Sunday engaging with you.
LiquidZeb wrote: » I know having family that want to visit you must be like science fiction to you.
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Im sorry for wasting your Sunday, could you possibly find the time to send me a link to the schemes for boosting economic liquidity in Ireland?
kippy wrote: » You have no understanding of economics. So I deem it a pointless conversation with no endpoint
FintanMcluskey wrote: » This made me laugh more than it should
theballz wrote: » Just back from a run, I was running down by the canal in Dublin. Safe to say social distancing is not being practised this weekend, people are drinking cans in the sun and BUNCHES of people together. Not a single Garda to be seen. Was quite disappointing. One thing that was fairly evident was that many of these people look to be foreign national students. A lot of South American’s (which isn’t a surprise) they love the sun and when we get it here they tend to make the most of it. Disappointing either way.
robbiezero wrote: » It seems like the Governement havent copped how big an issue this is for people. Like in a couple of weeks you can work all day on a building site with colleagues but cant sit in a garden with your elderly parents for 12 weeks. I have no problem with leo using notes on the late late, fair play for not winging it or bull****ting, but it was instructive that it was this question that he did not know the answers. I think a very large cohort of people will start ignoring this rule very soon and in an ad hoc fashion instead of having clear guidelines on how it could safely be done (with tiny risk)
FintanMcluskey wrote: » I dont have an understanding absolutely none. So I would appriciate some information on the schemes you are referring to?
FintanMcluskey wrote: » They were always allowed out to work. The urban areas limited movement for leisure
KrustyUCC wrote: » https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/coronavirus/whos-in-charge-cracks-appearing-as-tensions-mount-over-lockdown-exit-strategy/ar-BB13wvJx?ocid=sf2 Interesting article NPHET wanted 4 weeks in between phases lol Ours is one of the slowest plans in Europe as it is with 3 weeks inbetween phases
Thelonious Monk wrote: » My folks in Spain got outside for the first time in 7 weeks yesterday. Before that only one at at time could go to supermarket or pharmacy. It was all areas not just urban.
_Whimsical_ wrote: » Has that happened? Has anyone been sneering or unkind to a bereaved person visiting a grave? If so that's terrible. That person needs to be offered support and encouragement to stick with the measures in place. The last thing that person needs is unkindness, but they also don't need illness. If people are lonely we could all volunteer to ring someone up for a talk or we could all start a chat server to allow people desperate for some distraction have a new outlet and make a new friend. I think the reason why one groups difficulties surrounding the isolation is less well received is because only one group proposes an action that may cost lives and perpetuate a lockdown with huge personal,social and economic consequences. Traveling more than the proposed restrictions risks carrying disease to areas not badly affected. It's disinegenuous to compare the needs of both groups though because they are not the same, we cannot accept death because people are lonely etc because there are alternatives for those people, even if it is baring down a few extra weeks on it. Ultimately we share one primary need and it is not to die ourselves or not to be conforted with the grief of losing a loved one in dire circumstances without a hand to hold afterwards in our mourning or a funeral to attend. If you find yourself unfortunate enough to see what that looks like you will know it's a very different vista from being depressed , which is very difficult too. 2 weeks ago someone I know died. There was no funeral, no hugs for the family, no being able to reach out a hand to squeeze in place of the choked words that could never touch the heartbreak felt. There was just standing across a road watching a tearful goodbye to the coffin of a young person. Now there is a quiet house there with no visitors due to the vulnerability of a family member. If this virus spreads that will be the reality for many families, at the sharp end of this there is a tremendous, life long burden for some to carry. If we all act now to contain it , we might avoid it, we might be able to make more exceptions to reach to those most in need. We are not just preventing death, it is preventing depression and mental illness too by not traumatising people for life by losing loved ones in an awful way or traumatising medical staff who are risking themselves to treat the illness.
kippy wrote: » https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/economics.asp It's a good starting point.
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Thanks but I asked for the economic schemes implemented to counteract the 1m plus jobs lost here since the restrictions began? You said schemes were introduced that would boost the economy other than the Covid payment, what are they? The Covid payment is only increasing the national debt
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Im struggling to understand
FintanMcluskey wrote: » You might want to recheck my argument. They restarted construction and manufacturing over 3 weeks ago. If you worked in those industries you went to work. The rest of your post is correct, I never suggested otherwise
kippy wrote: » There's no point discussion economics with someone who doesn't understand economics even on a basic level.
DubInMeath wrote: » Actually it's not what you said at all, both your statements regarding work and exercise were factually incorrect.
iamwhoiam wrote: » An ICU consultant said in an interview last week that the vast majority of the Covid patients in the Mater were Roma and Brazalian . Make of that what you will
FintanMcluskey wrote: » My lack of understanding does not prevent you from referencing your argument. What are the schemes implemented for economic revival aside from the Covid payment? Ill leave it when you post what they are?
giveitholly wrote: » If we get fine weather in June I reckon the amount of bbqs and house parties that go on will be massive,there won't be much social distancing at these so I can't see the pub owners being too happy having to stay closed
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Considering Italy will open the pub's on June 1st the publicans have every right to feel aggrieved having to wait 2.5 months longer