freddie1970 wrote: » Imagine the scenario if we actually were forced to work during this crisis..the government saying the economy was more important and can't be shut down ... Would Gemma be on the streets looking for a shutdown ...
Balf wrote: » In fairness, it was already pretty much inaccessible to most of the city. But well within the 3,500 km range allowed to Bulgarian fruit pickers under the Health (Load of Bollocks) Regulations 2020. I'd say they're hopping if they noiw can't visit the Zoo.
Topgear on Dave wrote: » Entirely? Have all the gates been shut?
EDit wrote: » Not sure if it’s the same video, but In the one I’ve just seen Gemma says something like “your time is coming”. I understand why the Gards didn’t take it further at the time, but is that not considered a threat? Oh, I forgot to mention, she is a raging ****
Balf wrote: » I suspect the 'argument' is wishful thinking. Grown-ups know you can't have your cake and eat it. This is a farce being played out. Dragged out.
redarmy wrote: » The Phoenix Park has been completely closed off thanks to a protest organised
brightspark wrote: » I have seen an argument that the long term effect on GDP would be higher if we just allow the virus to spread (death rates would increase dramatically amongst the working population once the hospitals are overrun).
Balf wrote: » I fear your spark is dimming. Like all of us, you need this peculiar time to end.
Balf wrote: » I think our political leaders just needed to show the alternative is unsustainable. And, in fairness, that need seems global. I suspect, though, that the WHO are just technocrats. Probably surprised at the extent to which they were actually entertained.
brightspark wrote: » This whataboutery is pointless,...... Also I doubt if many complaining about the 2km limit on exercise ever walked even half that most of the time.
ArmaniJeanss wrote: » Potentially a similar court case in the UKhttps://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/may/01/uk-government-faces-legal-challenge-coronavirus-lockdown-businessman-simon-dolan Though it does seem to be a more reasonable way to approach it - I don't think he'll be going the screeching at police officers route.
Heat_Wave wrote: » When she told the guard that she “seemed quite nervous” over and over I felt my teeth gritting with anger. Oh course she’s nervous, you’re videoing her against her will, naming her to hundreds of thousands of people, and you are shouting abuse in her face, all whist she is standing on the frontline trying to protect horrible people like you from a deadly virus. What a vile human being! Reminds me of that a*sehole from White Moose Cafe. Attention seekers and bullies.
He is taking the action... on the grounds that the lockdown was both legally defective and disproportionate in law. He is also seeking minutes of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) meetings this year, some of which involved Boris Johnson’s adviser Dominic Cummings.
Grab All Association wrote: » Those of you in here calling for laws against recording encounters with An Garda Síochána seem to be forgetting what happened in the O’Higgins commission regarding Maurice McCabe, Jobstown trial where Gardaí committed perjury on the stand and the Rte cameraman assault etc If your a Garda and you’re not abusing your power then you should have nothing to worry about someone recording you.
Clarence Boddiker wrote: » Nobody at all bothered by the fact that the legislation may be unconstitutional?
Horsebox9000 wrote: » https://www.change.org/p/irish-court-services-gemma-o-doherty-and-or-john-waters-do-not-speak-for-us
krissovo wrote: » I would happily give 100 euro to any essential worker who experiences a filmed outburst of these vile citizen's. We should start go fund me's each time!
sweetie wrote: » I'm about to bury my mother who has passed due to this horrible virus. If I ever meet either of these despicable excuses for human beings so help me God I hope there's someone with me to keep me from driving a size 12 up their respective holes.