political analyst wrote: » His political career is nearly over. So what has Leo got to close by lifting the restrictions earlier? How can the health service be overwhelmed when the elderly and those with serious underlying problems are cocooning? I don't see why healthcare unrelated to Covid-19 should have been halted - given that all forms of cancer have higher mortality rates than Covid-19, the symptoms of which are not much different from the flu.
Arghus wrote: » Tell me how the economy in Italy has been less restricted than in Ireland for the past three weeks. Children in Spain couldn't leave their homes until this week.
facehugger99 wrote: » As long as we have clappy seals like this with a vote, we're royally fcuked.
niallo27 wrote: » Can you tell me what it was please. You think an extra 3k is good.
igCorcaigh wrote: » https://twitter.com/newschambers/status/1256286621835632643?s=19
nj27 wrote: » Am I right in thinking that if cases spike they can revert to previous stages of the plan, could they also advance more quickly if cases dry up?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Sorry to have a go at you, it wasn't meant to be personal, just used you as a punch bag. :eek:
malinheader wrote: » So you're saying unless you're elderly or have an underlying health issue you won't need to be hospitalized.,I know of 2 cases in my own area under 55 no health issues and needed to be hospitalized. So I still think it was a statement that will please hospital staff.
growleaves wrote: » There's been no indication of that, that I've seen or heard anywhere.
The framework is intended to be applied flexibly, so that it would be open to the NPHET, at any point in time, to recommend measures from later phases depending on the prevailing circumstances
FintanMcluskey wrote: » I've said this twice but I understand what Im dealing with. 3 weeks ago Spain reopened construction and manufacturing. Thats less restricted by 6 weeks by the time the 18th of May comes. The point about kids is unusual, kids would struggle with diggers I reckon
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Thats the issue. Its time for the media loving doctors to be stifled and return to covering up scandals they were better at that. Its time for the economists to take over
They will never jump ahead and will jump back in a heartbeat.
SAMTALK wrote: » Do you seriously think the government want this ? Do you think they want a recession ?
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Typical of the posters who scream life over economy I imagine
FintanMcluskey wrote: » They couldn't care by the sounds of things. Their livelihoods are completely safe and pensions won't suffer, so from what I see they have chosen the easy option devoid of any form of leadership, and will walk away with the country in total ruins
Pitch n Putt wrote: » They will never jump ahead and will jump back in a heartbeat. Three weeks between phases is absolutely ridiculous.
Ashleigh1986 wrote: » Up to this point the " lockdown " was pushed out by every 2 weeks . The 5 stages are going to be 3 weeks apart . This is a major mistake . The 5 stages should be only 2 weeks apart from each other . This would have meant country reopening on 27 th July . 5 weeks in summertime would mean a huge DIFFERANCE to businesses .
malinheader wrote: » He is damned if he does and damned if he doesn't. Opens up and health services become overwhelmed hes a cnut. Doesn't open up he is also a cnut. No winning whatever he was going to suggest.
Ashleigh1986 wrote: » Up to this point the " lockdown " was pushed out by every 2 weeks . The 5 stages are going to be 3 weeks apart .This is a major mistake . The 5 stages should be only 2 weeks apart from each other . This would have meant country reopening on 27 th July . 5 weeks in summertime would mean a huge DIFFERANCE to businesses .