na1 wrote: » I'm bit out of the loop, so what's the story with stay-at-home until 5th of May rule? Is it going to be announced today? should it be published on gov.ie or any other resource?
RugbyLad11 wrote: » I'm expecting the announcement tonight to be bad so he will be on the late late show to try win the public over
gozunda wrote: » I'd disagree. Never took you for a Boris fan tbh. But no matter. If the hat fits then wear it. The analogy is closest to home with a small self serving number of individuals suggesting we should throw certain categories of people under the bus and give up even trying to control the rate of infection and stopping the health services been overwhelmed. And yes the analogy stands - i reckon the same would have been cheering on the Vichy republic. But to remind those who've forgotten again - it's not just the HSE and Ireland. This is a global problem and thankfully not one to be decided by self serving idiots.
Roanmore wrote: » The one thing that annoys me here is people saying I'm going to listen to the medical experts over you. A medical expert messed up my wife's surgery and left her with permanent nerve damage. A medical expert presided over the Cervical Check controversy. A medical expert presided over Hep C scandal. A medical expert presided over the symphysiotomy scandal Medical experts are presiding over the trolley numbers. Yes of course listen to Medical experts, take on board what they say but this blind allegiance and look down attitude of some to people who question medical experts is nauseating and then when somebody is questioned they pull out the "dead relative" card.
JPCN1 wrote: » Should have realised he'd be on the Late Late, he does love the limelight. Will scold us again? Prefer him to explain why we had one of the lowest ICU capacities in the EU at the outset of this... Maybe how he couldn't pay a dignified wage to the army and other frontline workers but now can throw 115 million a month for empty private hospitals. How is he going to sort out the waiting lists which will have grown hugely over the period.. Trivial stuff like that. I guess it'll be more Churchillian rhetoric and a bit of Heaney.
snotboogie wrote: » and have thousands of people policing the hundreds of border crossings with the North? No more entering Ireland at all for the foreseeable future?
gozunda wrote: » As was pointed our previously- its just as well a lot of just 'live with it' brigade weren't around during ww2. So we are just to give up and surrender yes? No restrictions and if someones dies of the disease tough titty? Glad I dont live in your world ...
gozunda wrote: » So we are just to give up and surrender yes?
boring accountant wrote: » Tell that to the Gardaí outside my estate every other day.
nelly17 wrote: » The Meeting with NPHET is 3pm so Leo will probably be on the 6 one news - hes due on the Late Late tonight also
KrustyUCC wrote: » OK I take your point Majority of other countries have plans in place thoughhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rte.ie/amp/1135935/ Portugal should have less ICU capacity than us Our ICU capacity due to COVID is 103 of the 312 beds we originally had Apparently we should now have 800+ beds Even considering non COVID ICU cases that Shoukd be a good buffer
RugbyLad11 wrote: » YES! as this virus is not going anywhere so we must learn to live with it
JayRoc wrote: » Yes. Exactly my point. I don't know why people keep bringing up 2km in relation to anything other than their daily exercise. It's infuriating
RugbyLad11 wrote: » Yeah he has to do something, the meeting up with two people would be such a moral boost but I won't hold my breath
never_mind wrote: » The effects of this are beginning to take hold and am having quite horrible thoughts. This would be a lovely things for us to do safely. Even if I could visit a family member outside of 2k in their garden.
Naos wrote: » They may be in a worse position than us in terms of cases/deaths, but look at the total number of ICU beds per 100k if things start going south: Belgium as you've quoted have almost 2.5x the ICU beds we have. I'm aware we have increased capacity recently with the Private hospital takeover, not sure if other countries have done similar, a quick google says they have so using the above to keep it like for like.
showpony1 wrote: » People that don't live at home with family will then be exposed to everyone they live with's gatherings?
RugbyLad11 wrote: » Yeah he has to do some, the meeting up with two people would be such a moral boost but I won't hold my breath
KrustyUCC wrote: » The key to the roadmap will be what is in each phase It can't be too stung out and too unambitious or long Take Belgium for example They expect people to be able to host gatherings at home on May 18thAs an from Monday you can meet up with 2 people who dont live with them All shops to reopen May 11th with social distancing Their plan has specific dates in mind Will be interesting to see if Leo's does later
yosemitesam1 wrote: » It's pure guesswork and nothing else when "estimating" how much of the population will potentially get infected. There's no evidence to back any of it up. For all we actually know, infections might have fallen anyway without intervention. Other endemic coronavirus strains increase in late winter/early spring then fall naturally. We have no data to prove this strain is any different.
mandrake04 wrote: » Mass testing just tells you if you are going in the correct direction, but it has to be done right with results back in 12-48 hrs tops. None of this 2-3 week circle-jerking. Too many infections now to try and suppress it, you can only restrict the growth take the edge off rather than suppress and snuff it out NZ style. The chance was missed in early-mid March If you want to suppress it now you need to close down everything, supermarkets, off-licence, everything. No one steps out their door for 2 weeks, once the two weeks are up it will be suppressed and those still standing can walk out the door. That's not going to happen ...so you can only stumble forward and restrict.
hmmm wrote: » Mass testing will not suppress this, it will only help to suppress it. Social distancing and the ban on gatherings are probably the key measures which have suppressed the virus so far. They will have to continue, with some exceptions if possible.
stephenjmcd wrote: » I dont think anyone is arguing against the phased reopening it's the proper way to do things.What's annoying people is being told constantly we're doing well but not well enough, when the vast majority of the general public have done what's been asked of them and seem to be still getting the blame for want of a better phrase as to why we're not in a position to start the phased reopening. When the HSE and dept of health have been talking about meeting this target of 15k tests a day for the last 4 weeks, likewise contact tracing not up to scratch. The public have done what's been asked, the powers that be haven't
C__MC wrote: » Will Harris lift the laws around restrictions anyone think? I think the restrictions wont make a huge difference to most people from tonight on, many people are out and about as it is.