the kelt wrote: » Only time will tell, if we have done such a great job with testing, tracing etc how come it looks like we will be the last country in europe to begin easing restrictions substantially?
gozunda wrote: » Bolloxs. The disease can affect any age any group. The young, the middle aged and the elderly. Medical research indicates that over 60% of the worlds population will become infected at some point. Why the need for restrictions? Exactly because just about anyone can get it and all those can spread it. Hence the restictions to control the spread of the disease and to stop heslth services being overwhelmed - like Italy. Nursing homes across the world are unfortunately being badly affected - not just Ireland. The reasons for this is because the people living there cannot socially isolate and have vulnerable people who live alongside the healthy. But more importantly nursing homes cannot be completely isolated from the wider community. Nurses, staff, catering is all required to keep these homes happens. The staff and other personal live in the wider community. Get rid of those restrictions and the infection rate will climb and more people in the community will increasingly bring the disease to those in such settings . Restrictions are there for these exact and very good reasons. That some refuse to acknowledge that is neither here nor there.
KrustyUCC wrote: » They expect people to be able to host gatherings at home on May 18th
KrustyUCC wrote: » The key to the roadmap will be what is in each phase It can't be too stung out and too unambitious or long Take Belgium for example They expect people to be able to host gatherings at home on May 18th As an from Monday you can meet up with 2 people who dont live with them All shops to reopen May 11th with social distancing Their plan has specific dates in mind Will be interesting to see if Leo's does later
stephenjmcd wrote: » That's the thing from the leaks in the last week it seems as if this will be dragged out while countires who've been in much worse positions than us will be essentially back up and running. A plan without a timeline will be basically no good as it doesn't give anyone anything to actually aim towards. Find it mind boggling how every other country can manage to give a decent laid out plan but not here. I hope I'm wrong and this evening we'll see I just get the feelings it's going to be more of these are the phases but we'll get the "when the time is right" talk
Naos wrote: » They may be in a worse position than us in terms of cases/deaths, but look at the total number of ICU beds per 100k if things start going south: Belgium as you've quoted have almost 2.5x the ICU beds we have. I'm aware we have increased capacity recently with the Private hospital takeover, not sure if other countries have done similar, a quick google says they have so using the above to keep it like for like.
gozunda wrote: » And btw I was replying to those who dont believe in any restrictions - of whom there are many on this thread apparently.
C__MC wrote: » Will Harris lift the laws around restrictions anyone think? I think the restrictions wont make a huge difference to most people from tonight on, many people are out and about as it is.
Kobe Colossal Cape wrote: » Any idea what time the announcement will be made this evening from the government?
stephenjmcd wrote: » I dont think anyone is arguing against the phased reopening it's the proper way to do things.What's annoying people is being told constantly we're doing well but not well enough, when the vast majority of the general public have done what's been asked of them and seem to be still getting the blame for want of a better phrase as to why we're not in a position to start the phased reopening. When the HSE and dept of health have been talking about meeting this target of 15k tests a day for the last 4 weeks, likewise contact tracing not up to scratch. The public have done what's been asked, the powers that be haven't
hmmm wrote: » Mass testing will not suppress this, it will only help to suppress it. Social distancing and the ban on gatherings are probably the key measures which have suppressed the virus so far. They will have to continue, with some exceptions if possible.
mandrake04 wrote: » Mass testing just tells you if you are going in the correct direction, but it has to be done right with results back in 12-48 hrs tops. None of this 2-3 week circle-jerking. Too many infections now to try and suppress it, you can only restrict the growth take the edge off rather than suppress and snuff it out NZ style. The chance was missed in early-mid March If you want to suppress it now you need to close down everything, supermarkets, off-licence, everything. No one steps out their door for 2 weeks, once the two weeks are up it will be suppressed and those still standing can walk out the door. That's not going to happen ...so you can only stumble forward and restrict.
yosemitesam1 wrote: » It's pure guesswork and nothing else when "estimating" how much of the population will potentially get infected. There's no evidence to back any of it up. For all we actually know, infections might have fallen anyway without intervention. Other endemic coronavirus strains increase in late winter/early spring then fall naturally. We have no data to prove this strain is any different.
KrustyUCC wrote: » The key to the roadmap will be what is in each phase It can't be too stung out and too unambitious or long Take Belgium for example They expect people to be able to host gatherings at home on May 18thAs an from Monday you can meet up with 2 people who dont live with them All shops to reopen May 11th with social distancing Their plan has specific dates in mind Will be interesting to see if Leo's does later
RugbyLad11 wrote: » Yeah he has to do some, the meeting up with two people would be such a moral boost but I won't hold my breath
showpony1 wrote: » People that don't live at home with family will then be exposed to everyone they live with's gatherings?
never_mind wrote: » The effects of this are beginning to take hold and am having quite horrible thoughts. This would be a lovely things for us to do safely. Even if I could visit a family member outside of 2k in their garden.
RugbyLad11 wrote: » Yeah he has to do something, the meeting up with two people would be such a moral boost but I won't hold my breath
JayRoc wrote: » Yes. Exactly my point. I don't know why people keep bringing up 2km in relation to anything other than their daily exercise. It's infuriating
RugbyLad11 wrote: » YES! as this virus is not going anywhere so we must learn to live with it