easypazz wrote: » It is noticeable how there are fewer members of the "its not a lockdown" political party posting on here each passing day. Most people realise now that this is a crock of sh1t and have had enough of these measures. The tide is turning fast.
lawrencesummers wrote: » It says a lot about people when that are praising Ivan Yeates. People have short memories.
drunkmonkey wrote: » I'll say one thing about the medical handling of this, I'm pretty sure there's only 2 genders now they've stopped reporting the unknown genders, this can only be good for the youth of the country.
gozunda wrote: » Truth hurts obviously
alwald wrote: » I sense some bitterness in your post now that you realise that your predictions of May 5th, the "big day", aren't materialising.
Stark wrote: » https://twitter.com/GardaTraffic/status/1255957627110031371?s=09
Discodog wrote: » Mr Harris said that a similar garda presence would be in place for the May bank holiday weekend. He said that there was a time limit on how long the current high level of garda monitoring could continue. "We can't keep going at this operational tempo, which began around the 16th of March, indefinitely, or indeed, for very much longer," he said.
easypazz wrote: » Lockdown will be lifted in all but name after this weekend.
Longing wrote: » Good job Ireland is going to War anytime soon. Physical I mean. Because reading comments here about lifting restrictions is like people running to the enemy with your arms open to Covid 19. We are at War against invisible enemy so far 20,612 casualties and 1,232 deaths in two months. In the last number of weeks we have brought up the heavy artillery (Restrictions) and its working. So why would you lift restrictions for the enemy to regroup and counter attack.
munsterlegend wrote: » And if you keep saying the same thing repeatedly it will happen? nothing will majorly change for a number of weeks maybe months. That’s reality.
Seanachai wrote: » This thing could be the death knell of wokeness, people just won't have the patience for all that noise when they're trying to rebuild their lives.
begbysback wrote: » People are not designed to have their freedom restricted. If a member of society breaks the law then what is the worse thing we can do to them? Restrict their freedom. There are seriously violent convicted criminals in jails around this island at the moment, and they have more freedom than us. House arrest must be removed this weekend.
gozunda wrote: » Not disimilar to those who argued for Frances capitulation to Germany during ww2.
easypazz wrote: » Its not truth its drivel. Like this bit And reading the accounts of posters on this thread and elsewhere who have detailed their experiences - the illness is no joke I mean seriously, what sort of analysis is that?
munsterlegend wrote: » Ok so if somebody does something wrong /makes bad decisions anything they do after that must also be damned? Must be some view from your ivory tower. We won’t even mention your past tasteless comments on this forum.
marno21 wrote: » Re: death rate in under 45s. 2 deaths in 15-24 category, 3 deaths in 25-34 and 9 deaths in 35-44 year olds. 14 deaths in total from a total of ~8k cases. I'd also be willing to bet that many cases in these categories were sufficiently mild to not warrant testing or be asymptomatic. I'd bet that if under 45s with no underlying conditions are at negligible risk. Having them under house arrest is ridiculous when you look at the figures that Dan O'Brien is pointing out, which he is spot on. Source: https://www.hpsc.ie/a-z/respiratory/coronavirus/novelcoronavirus/casesinireland/epidemiologyofcovid-19inireland/COVID-19%20Epidemiology%20report%20for%20NPHET%2020200429_website.pdf
gozunda wrote: » Do you always write such complete and utter rubbish?
_Kaiser_ wrote: » While I agree with your point to an extent, this is no different to any wealthy people using loopholes to limit the tax they pay, or companies setting up effectively mailboxes here for the same purposes, or multinationals routing profits to where they pay the least. Distasteful maybe, but perfectly legal - and in the latter cases they provide thousands of jobs we absolutely depend on.
gozunda wrote: » A good analogy. There are those repetively pushing the dictate that 'we have to live with disease' or wtte, that only those living on "borrowed time" will die and that the economy is the most important thing yada yada yada Not disimilar to those who argued for Frances capitulation to Germany during ww2. The same who supported that living with the enemy was the only solution, that only certain people including Jewish citizens and those deemed unfit would die and this will save the economy. Yeah that worked lads. I never thought I'd see the day that Ireland was populated by similar surrender monkey types. But I suppose it not that surprising tbh. The same seem to exist in all societies. Things evidently dont change.
Penfailed wrote: » For real?! I think you are wrong. Very wrong.
facehugger99 wrote: » Yep, it's literally the exact same thing.
lawrencesummers wrote: » If you find the truth distasteful that’s your problem.
rovers_runner wrote: » Not to be flippant but I wonder how many people of the age bracket 15-44 died of the following causes in that period: - Road traffic accidents - Suicide - Cancer - Other LTI associated deaths