GazzaL wrote: » I was chatting to a bank manager yesterday, he said owners of SMEs are crying down the phone to him. The businesses they've worked so hard to build are being destroyed. 50% of our workforce are dependent on handouts from the State. A lot of the temporary job losses are going to become permanent because of the poor decision-making and handing over of power to the HSE. The longer the lockdown continues, the worse it will be.
Multipass wrote: » Well that rankles- unlucky to have been made unemployed just before all of this, my household is 2 adults living on 240 total.. Doesn’t feel a damn like we’re all in this together. I can already predict in the coming recession being told how we all partied on 350 each.
HeidiHeidi wrote: » This. Every single day at the start, either Simon Harris or Tony Holohan explained that they didn't want to impose harsher restrictions any earlier than they absolutely had to, because they becoming increasingly hard to stick to as time goes on. How they can now resist saying "I told you so" is beyond me. If I had the energy I'd go back and see who was clamouring for a total lockdown early on, and see if they're the same ones now screaming for the (non-)lockdown to be lifted because they're sick of it. I bet there'd be a lot of crossover.
iamwhoiam wrote: » https://extra.ie/2020/04/28/news/irish-news/covid-19-was-present-in-irish-hopitals-two-weeks-before-first-positive-test Four patients treated in ICU in the weeks leading up to the first positive COVID-19 test later tested positive for the disease according to Virgin Media News. The first positive test in Ireland was confirmed on the 29th of February, however, it has now been reported that the virus was in fact present in Ireland for some time before that date I wonder how true this is ? But it seems to have been verified
Penfailed wrote: » @easyspaz
Penfailed wrote: » @easyspaz, here's another post that quoted your 'Source?' post.
easypazz wrote: » Good to see. There were quite a few on here trying to pretend this is not a major concern. Normally the same ones that like to pretend we are not in lockdown either.
Deleted User wrote: » Imagine the threads if the government had shut down the country when the rest of Europe was wide open
GazzaL wrote: » Hopefully an intrepid journalist will ask him to clarify later today so!
Discodog wrote: » Listening to Newstalk. There have been a succession of contributors warning that deaths from lack of routine medicine will kill more than Covid.
Scruff101 wrote: » How do you know? He's only giving covid figures. There's other people taking up ICU beds for other non covid reasons so we don't know the capacity.
Nermal wrote: » I assume he just forgot to add consideration of the economic impacts to the list?
seamus wrote: » There won't be dates at all, as the plan will be goal-driven, not date-driven.It'll be more like, "When number X has been at or below value Y for two consecutive weeks, then we will move to phase 2. Phase 2 will last for at least four weeks. At the end of these four weeks if <...> criteria are met, we will move to phase 3. If not, we remain in phase 2 for two more weeks. If the figures regress, we will step back to phase 1". And so on. The people agonising here over tiny statements is a bit bizarre. Journalists are attempting to draw the CMO on exact figures so that they have a story to write. So that they have a stick to beat him with later on. This is like asking an army general when he thinks his troops should withdraw, knowing full well that the final decision does not rest with him. It would be very irresponsible for him to give specifics to the press, before the government have presented a plan. He is not the one making the decisions, he is providing advice. If he says one thing, and the government presents something slightly different, then the media will hammer a wedge into that gap and undermine public confidence in the lockdown. There is a concerted effort within our media, to undermine the state's effort and controlling this outbreak. I have no idea where it's coming from, but it's there. DOB's media are bad for it, but there are worse ones.
the kelt wrote: » What do people want, say nothing, ask no questions, follow and baa like sheep, clap when instructed to?
KrustyUCC wrote: » Changes will be made every two to four weeks but the Government will intervene if things are going off track and some elements would be reintroduced. Mr Varadkar said he hopes to put the plan before Cabinet tomorrow to be signed off on. He said there were five key priorities to be considered in lifting the restrictions: Progress of the disease Healthcare capacity and resilience Testing and contact tracing capacity Ability to shield and care for at-risk groups Risk of secondary morbidity due to the restrictions themselves
GazzaL wrote: » He was asked for a number and avoided giving it. We're way below ICU capacity at the moment.
[Deleted User] wrote: » https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
KrustyUCC wrote: » It's going to be a big big issue as this goes on Peoples mental health can be fragile Taking the Irish Times article from the other day as being four phased Everything going well apparently travel beyond 20km is in phase 4 So that's 4 X 2 weeks = 2 months 2 months more of not seeing friends, family, other half's not living together If some phases are a month in between then that's further out Not seeing friends, family, other half's not living together for a minimum of 4 months will be extremely hard on people 2 months down the line at best before you could even go to a garden, social distance but yet see people
Penfailed wrote: » Jesus. Seriously? A quick Google would tell you that the first confirmed case in Spain was on the 31st of January. The first confirmed case in Ireland was the 28th of February. We're one calendar month behind them.
polesheep wrote: » Absolute nonsense! Would you prefer to live in North Korea? Questioning the actions of the state is a vastly different thing to undermining it. In my opinion, journalists have been too slow to ask the right questions.
easypazz wrote: » Cop out. Never saw anything about it and I have been following this thread quite closely.
seamus wrote: » I'm mainly talking about stuff like this; https://twitter.com/thejournal_ie/status/1255551168731906054 And the Keelings rubbish. The spread of false or misleading information to create a people -v- government sentiment. But there are also parts of the open media who are deliberately overstating or misstating things in order to wind people up.
seamus wrote: » There won't be dates at all, as the plan will be goal-driven, not date-driven. It'll be more like, "When number X has been at or below value Y for two consecutive weeks, then we will move to phase 2. Phase 2 will last for at least four weeks. At the end of these four weeks if <...> criteria are met, we will move to phase 3. If not, we remain in phase 2 for two more weeks. If the figures regress, we will step back to phase 1". And so on. The people agonising here over tiny statements is a bit bizarre. Journalists are attempting to draw the CMO on exact figures so that they have a story to write. So that they have a stick to beat him with later on. This is like asking an army general when he thinks his troops should withdraw, knowing full well that the final decision does not rest with him. It would be very irresponsible for him to give specifics to the press, before the government have presented a plan. He is not the one making the decisions, he is providing advice. If he says one thing, and the government presents something slightly different, then the media will hammer a wedge into that gap and undermine public confidence in the lockdown.There is a concerted effort within our media, to undermine the state's effort and controlling this outbreak. I have no idea where it's coming from, but it's there. DOB's media are bad for it, but there are worse ones.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Changes will be made every two to four weeks but the Government will intervene if things are going off track and some elements would be reintroduced. Mr Varadkar said he hopes to put the plan before Cabinet tomorrow to be signed off on. He said there were five key priorities to be considered in lifting the restrictions: Progress of the disease Healthcare capacity and resilience Testing and contact tracing capacity Ability to shield and care for at-risk groupsRisk of secondary morbidity due to the restrictions themselves