road_high wrote: » I don’t get it. If people wanted to join the ps there has been ample opportunities to do so in the past 5 years. Obviously there will be a recruitment bar now but might lift if the economy recovers quickly. The focus needs to be getting us all back to work for all our sakes. I know lots in the PS working away from home, doubly different as it’s not something they normally do unlike many of us that always did it with laptops etc- many wouldn’t have even had a laptop for to encryption and security protocols. There’s much more of a very rigid office culture in the PS.
lord quackinton wrote: » updated - figures taken from worldometer Sweden Chances of dying from corona .025% - no lockdown Uk Chances of dying from corona .04% - late to lockdown and Large population Ireland Chances of dying from corona .025% - early to lockdown and small population. Half of Sweden’s population America Chances of dying from corona .019% - Donald trump has received world criticism and is held been personally accountable for the thousands of deaths Time to open up?
arctictree wrote: » What if they provide us with a plan but the numbers just stay where they are indefinitely? Do we just stay in lockdown indefinitely? Not going to work....
lord quackinton wrote: » updated - figures taken from worldometer Sweden Chances of dying from corona .025% - no lockdown Ireland Chances of dying from corona .025% - early to lockdown and small population. Half of Sweden’s population America Chances of dying from corona .019% - Donald trump has received world criticism and is held been personally accountable for the thousands of deaths Time to open up?
FloatingVoter wrote: » There could be a second wave. They all have their eyes on the Spanish Flu.
gauchesnell wrote: » wow...yeah there is a lot of PS hate at the moment which is understandable I suppose. We are still getting paid cos we are working from home - unfortunately some jobs cannot be done from home. There will always be messers no matter where you work. I despise working from home though
FloatingVoter wrote: » It's not official newspaper time. Just getting in early and get up to speed. Lads that I know working on sites do exactly the same. They just want to know about stuff going on in the world. I'd be doing the same if I was working in a bakery or a bar. I could call it cartwheel time but my back is shot. And I'm not doing Yoga for the same reason.
road_high wrote: » Other side of the coin- I worked much harder in the PS role I worked than the private role I’m in now- so much more autonomy and decision making. Probably more specific to the role, but I had tons of clients always ringing me, scheme deadlines etc.- if you didn’t do the job you’d be stirring up big problems. You were also chained to a desk or on visits 9-5 with a weekly diary to fill in of your activities. I couldn’t hack that now.
gauchesnell wrote: » ????maybe. I think I have worked in one area like that but not currently or recently. Definitely no newspaper time in my experience so far in PS.
FloatingVoter wrote: » . Privileged. But easily found. I'm sure that's true of most office cultures though. You turn up half asleep and you go home half dazed. Then it's time to get up again.
gauchesnell wrote: » oh dear where do you work!!!! none of the above thanks
FloatingVoter wrote: » Reading the newspapers to find out what brilliant statements our glorious leaders have made the night before to at least appear aware of what is going on. That I'd count as work. Keeping up with the Kardashians, swapping cake recipes and Wondering if Jack got off with Jill last night is the idling time. I just mean we're not robots. Once clocked in we're not exactly on the job. No more than when clocked out we're off it.
gauchesnell wrote: » ah grand. still wondering what newspaper time is
FloatingVoter wrote: » No - flexi is gone during the pandemic. I'm talking about the normal hours in normal times. 1.5 times 12 = 18. It's about as sweeping as the last circular.
Long_Wave wrote: » They are obviously waiting for the uk
gmisk wrote: » I have been in PS 16+ years and definitely not heard of a productivity allowance. You get flexitime if you are below a certain grade only (below AP). As for your first and last hour thing....not in my experience I am lucky to get 30 minutes for lunch.
gauchesnell wrote: » nope and nope - speaking for myself thats incorrect. such a sweeping statement. and at present we can work up 1.5 days per month flexi. No flexi while working from home.
FloatingVoter wrote: » No productivity allowance. At least not in this century. We do get flexi-time. You can work up to 18 days a year off by early starts and late finishes on the other days. In reality, discount that first and last hour of work as teabreak / newspaper / gossip time. Most people manage about 5 or 6 days a year of flexi. Anyone with long commutes or school runs isn't really at the party.
FloatingVoter wrote: » No productivity allowance. At least not in this century. We do get flexi-time. You can work up to 18 days a year off by early starts and late finishes on the other days. In reality, discount that first and last hour of work as teabreak / newspaper / gossip time. Most people manage about 5 or 6 days a year of flexi.
Mickla wrote: » Never heard of "productivity allowance" in the civil service and I worked in a good few departments. Do you have experience of working in the public sector and if so what area has this?
FloatingVoter wrote: » No productivity allowance. At least not in this century. We do get flexi-time. You can work up to 18 days a year off by early starts and late finishes on the other days. In reality, discount that first and last hour of "work" as teabreak / newspaper / gossip time. Most people manage about 5 or 6 days a year of flexi.
Spencer Brown wrote: » In all seriousness, you could have a lash off doing it yourself, the dog won't judge you if you don't do a great job :pac: We bought a few bits to groom our dogs about a month ago expecting that the groomer wouldn't be an option for a while. Give it a go might save a lot of money in the long run.