stephenjmcd wrote: » To be fair enough of it has been leaked that we know what's coming unless they've already seen public reaction and decide to change the plan slightly it'll be what we know already I think
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Just saying... it's a new world out there, and we have never had to stop kids from mingling and hugging granny and grandad and their cousins etc. up to now. It is all so nerve wracking in a lot of ways. Granny and Grandad are a bit concerned too, but DO want to see the kids. Tough call, because I know the first thing the kids will do is barrel up to them and hug and kiss them and so on, it is tough for everyone. I don't know the solution either.
road_high wrote: » Not even bothered watching this plonker in all his glory. Pointless waste of time, the headlines or whatever will confirm whatever they’ve been drip feeding all week. Ie let’s bury our heads in sand for another blast and cross our fingers
SusieBlue wrote: » I also said my dog was overheating due to the weight of his heavy coat & cannot be walked properly because of this, which in my opinion is a reasonable, legitimate concern as an animal owner. I said I was happy that TD’s are pleading with the government to open dog groomers as they are an essential service for a lot of people. You then took the piss out of me, mocking me saying I just wanted to get my dog a haircut so I gave you another example of an elderly woman who has injured herself and is now in hospital after an accident that occurred when she was trying to bathe her dog. You know, to further prove my point that animal groomers are in fact an essential service. Even your choice of language of ‘poor doggo’ just shows you are still sneering and trivialising my point which is quite pathetic but totally transparent to anyone reading these posts. Whatever, clearly you think it’s funny and irrelevant and that’s you’re prerogative but this isn’t all about you and this is an essential, necessary service that people are struggling without.
KrustyUCC wrote: » Exactly They will lose a lot of public support by going down that road
timmy_mallet wrote: » Be comfortable with the risk as a family or not. Dont see much else you can do?
arctictree wrote: » What if they provide us with a plan but the numbers just stay where they are indefinitely? Do we just stay in lockdown indefinitely? Not going to work....
Long_Wave wrote: » People need to take back control themselves and open for business.
Mickla wrote: » Never heard of "productivity allowance" in the civil service and I worked in a good few departments. Do you have experience of working in the public sector and if so what area has this?
Spencer Brown wrote: » In all seriousness, you could have a lash off doing it yourself, the dog won't judge you if you don't do a great job :pac: We bought a few bits to groom our dogs about a month ago expecting that the groomer wouldn't be an option for a while. Give it a go might save a lot of money in the long run.
FloatingVoter wrote: » No productivity allowance. At least not in this century. We do get flexi-time. You can work up to 18 days a year off by early starts and late finishes on the other days. In reality, discount that first and last hour of "work" as teabreak / newspaper / gossip time. Most people manage about 5 or 6 days a year of flexi.
FloatingVoter wrote: » No productivity allowance. At least not in this century. We do get flexi-time. You can work up to 18 days a year off by early starts and late finishes on the other days. In reality, discount that first and last hour of work as teabreak / newspaper / gossip time. Most people manage about 5 or 6 days a year of flexi.
FloatingVoter wrote: » No productivity allowance. At least not in this century. We do get flexi-time. You can work up to 18 days a year off by early starts and late finishes on the other days. In reality, discount that first and last hour of work as teabreak / newspaper / gossip time. Most people manage about 5 or 6 days a year of flexi. Anyone with long commutes or school runs isn't really at the party.
gauchesnell wrote: » nope and nope - speaking for myself thats incorrect. such a sweeping statement. and at present we can work up 1.5 days per month flexi. No flexi while working from home.
gmisk wrote: » I have been in PS 16+ years and definitely not heard of a productivity allowance. You get flexitime if you are below a certain grade only (below AP). As for your first and last hour thing....not in my experience I am lucky to get 30 minutes for lunch.
Long_Wave wrote: » They are obviously waiting for the uk
FloatingVoter wrote: » No - flexi is gone during the pandemic. I'm talking about the normal hours in normal times. 1.5 times 12 = 18. It's about as sweeping as the last circular.
gauchesnell wrote: » ah grand. still wondering what newspaper time is
FloatingVoter wrote: » Reading the newspapers to find out what brilliant statements our glorious leaders have made the night before to at least appear aware of what is going on. That I'd count as work. Keeping up with the Kardashians, swapping cake recipes and Wondering if Jack got off with Jill last night is the idling time. I just mean we're not robots. Once clocked in we're not exactly on the job. No more than when clocked out we're off it.
gauchesnell wrote: » oh dear where do you work!!!! none of the above thanks
FloatingVoter wrote: » . Privileged. But easily found. I'm sure that's true of most office cultures though. You turn up half asleep and you go home half dazed. Then it's time to get up again.