robbiezero wrote: » What is the probability of transmission of the virus for someone who has been obeying the restrictions and keeping social distancing, visiting elderly parents (who have been doing the same) and meeting them in their garden for a chat while keeping the 2 metres distance for a few hours?
Penfailed wrote: » Really?! Anyone else saying this has been branded as a 'lockdown nazi' or a member of the 'lockdown brigade'...by you!
hmmm wrote: » Mental health is going to be badly affected if the virus starts going exponential again and the news is full of reports of overloaded ICU departments. Then we'll be back to lighting candles at 8pm, but with new haircuts.
easypazz wrote: » All these articles are just journalists making predictions, in fact we are probably doing a better job on here. Fast food chains to be allowed reopen for takeaway? They are already allowed open for takeaway, lots of them are, including Supermac. Nothing new in these articles at all. Construction to restart from next week, roadmap for everything else, phased reopening and stepback if cases get out of hand.Nobody ever expected back to normal next Tuesday.
Penfailed wrote: » Well...no. They questioned the justification for a lockdown until a vaccine is found. That's not feasible. They didn't question the justification for a continuation of current restrictions.
The HorsesMouth wrote: » It's seems obvious at this stage that the lockdown is being extended because they don't have different elements to control an outbreak in place i.e testing, contact tracing. How can it all hinge on a couple of admissions to ICU more than anticipated? If they feel they cant deal with a few extra admissions then why would they ever lift restrictions?! And you know I think if they came out and said to us that there have been delays but by May 14th for example we will be in a solid position to deal with it then people would accept it. But this slight blame game going on last week about more people out and about is not sitting well with people...more specifically the 90% of people who are following the rules as they have been asked. For the record I do support this lockdown and the next couple of weeks if that's what it takes (not sure if I could take much more after that) but I think a bit more openness and honesty would go a long way.
Nermal wrote: » https://www.forbes.com/sites/gabrielleigh/2020/04/27/the-predicted-coronavirus-catastrophe-hasnt-arrived-in-sweden-whats-next/#7b44042b3caf Sweden: roads busy. Shops busy. Travel agents busy. One can avail of luxuries forgotten here such as, for instance, a haircut. Spend the evening at a packed barbeque. Field hospitals empty. We're in the midst of a mass delusion.
is_that_so wrote: » Now the question of collective mental health becomes as much an issue as controlling the spread of the virus.
jonnny68 wrote: » yep if they announce a 2 week extension then a substantial amount of people will do their own thing, people are at breaking point as it stands.
kenmm wrote: » You mean they can ease restrictions because they are better run or what?
Deleted User wrote: » Count me in, I’m done with this.
drunkmonkey wrote: » The message from media at the moment has to be no they won't lift restrictions. It'll be at the last minute they don't want us to get complacent this week. There towing the party line at the moment which is the right thing to do. Wait and see what Ivan Yates has to say about it this evening, he's not in the bull**** business.
facehugger99 wrote: » If the rumours are true about the pathetic relaxations of the current restrictions than it is clear we are dealing with a caretaker Govt. that has become paralyzed with fear and incapable to making decisions. I hope people take it upon themselves to send a clear message that this is unacceptable. Our jobs, prosperities and children's futures are being flushed down the toilet by a Taoiseach and Ministers too scared to face down the social-media hysteria merchants.
easypazz wrote: » You obviously don't understand how the media works. A newspaper never refused ink.
stephenjmcd wrote: » The sad thing is despite all of the restrictions on the public, half of our deaths occurred in long term care settings or nursing homes. That's a failure by the department of health and the HSE not on the restrictions of the general population.
SNNUS wrote: » The way they release this information is so disrespectful, clap along the government if you like and don the green jersey shoite but the virus is going nowhere so if lock down is their only forward plan don't complain when you see people out etc when walking your dog...
Gael23 wrote: » Yes theres 7 days until May 5th but a decisinwill be made in advance of that date. Public support is diminishing so people will begin doing their own thing anyway
[Deleted User] wrote: » Newstalk News at 8am saying lockdown is likely to continue............for another 2 weeks
Deleted User wrote: » I’m not on here during the day. I’m gardening or walking. I listen to News first thing in the morning , 8am, then 9 o clock News at night , missed it last night so I watched Claire Byrne instead. That’s it .I’m not on here all day, it would wreck my head.
callaway92 wrote: » Where did I say that? Cop on to yourself and get a grip. I was explaining how journalism works.
kippy wrote: » Stop listening to as much news or being on here. Assume they will continue for two more weeks. Try break away from reading or listening to anything about this if you find it so upsetting. Try not worry about the uncontrollables
robbiezero wrote: » Vacuum of leadership.
stephenjmcd wrote: » For anyone interested this is part of today's independent article. It'll be interesting to see the plan they come out with but if the first phase is minimal changes then what's the point? 2 more weeks then minimal changes, so basically until the end of May or is the first phase from 5th May. I'm sorry but what a load of crap, I've said it before I've been following the restrictions to the letter since the start, but after next week I'm done.