Deleted User wrote: » Then by end of week,we should be finished with these and work from there as regards new case numbers??
Spencer Brown wrote: » Can someone explain how this works because after 2 months I still don't think I understand. Let's say we wait for a few more weeks to start easing restrictions, what changes? What's the actual benefit of waiting a bit longer?
Penfailed wrote: » Eh? Who's the, 'sick bastards'? The guards for doing what they are told, or the government for trying to save lives?
Wanderer78 wrote: » Why did you promise him, if you do not know for sure what's gonna happen, you could have been vague with him about when, he d be fine?
Deleted User wrote: » He is argueing,that sectors will close down if not reopened?? If these sectors are viable,new businesses will replace them,if there demand exist?? Like realistically china waited until they were several days without new cases to reopen,we should get as close to that as we can..... 700 new cases yesterday,is forever too high,afaik.that is one of our highest daily increases,deosnt seem to be slowing atal??
drunkmonkey wrote: 5km or 10km won't cut it, it needs to be a completely done away with. I promised the young fella last night we'd be catching crabs at the beach in 8 more sleeps and come hell or high water he'll be out with his fishing net and bucket.
is_that_so wrote: » That's pure CMO-speak! There may be some like that I think but that speaks to 2 week reviews. Other stuff like schools and some businesses will have to have actual dates.
rovers_runner wrote: » You'd have to assume most of the lockdown merchants on here are the teachers and civil servants who are on full pay and will be while this charade goes on. The restrictions will only last on businesses and movement of people while the Govt can continue to pay the €350, once they reach the end of the road with affording that it will be every man for themselves. Then the sh1t will hit the fan and hundreds of thousands will be left unemployed on €200 a week and told they are on their own now, landlords and vulture funds at the ready.
is_that_so wrote: » Nursing home testing is still ongoing so no surprise in higher numbers.
stephenjmcd wrote: » I get the feeling that this exiting lockdown plan is going to be the most vague document the government has presented to us yet. Independent also reporting that there wont be any dates or timeline given to the phases in it other than "at the appropriate time"
Discodog wrote: » I wonder if it's a good idea to have loads of checkpoints, right up to the end & then none. Better to phase them out.
niallo27 wrote: » A destroyed economy costs lifes and destroys even more though. There has to be a balance.
is_that_so wrote: » BH weekend will have some people even more antsy and as it might be the end of this current regime of restrictions, there is a need to ensure people hang in till the end of that period. The weather might help there anyway!
ChikiChiki wrote: » You really value the economy over mass deaths?
drunkmonkey wrote: » We've suspended cancer screening, that already has to have had a knock on effect. Probably a whole host of other progressive diseases put on the back boiler as well.
Penfailed wrote: » He does. He has said as much repeatedly. He tries to defend it by saying that if the economy tanks (which is bound to happen worldwide anyway), there will be deaths as a knock on effect.
easypazz wrote: » They are on about a bigger garda operation this weekend, more checkpoints and starting earlier. Sick bastards.
Deleted User wrote: » I dont think any econmy is worth losing 20K lives for,catch a hold of yourself