Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Which is also your opinion. We will see what happens.
KerryConnor wrote: » Re measuring "life years" rather than lives.. I find that way of looking at it disturbing. No life is more expendable. If that was ok than you could judge the worth of a life in all sorts of ways.. how much decency, brains or sporting ability someone has. No way of knowing how much lifespan anyone has left anyway.
Ellie1988 wrote: » This idea is still in its early days and theyve only just starting discussing it in the uk now, but if we could implement something like this after May 5th it could be the boost people need https://www.google.com/amp/s/metro.co.uk/2020/04/24/small-bubbles-friends-family-allowed-meet-soon-12605196/amp/
lord quackinton wrote: » in the times today there was an article that quoted ronald reagans great line the nine scariest words in the English language were: “I’m from the government and I’m here to help. funny because its true. the bigger government grows the more individual liberty weakens government naturally wants to grow and grow and individual departments are actually in competition with each other for power. the more unemployment the happier dept of welfare are the more working the happier revenue are the more sick people the happier dept of health the more immigrant children the happier dept of education never trust governmentharris and king leo are actually loving the power that comes with this crisis. they dont want it to the end.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Really? Strange isn`t it that after the GE results that FG and Leo in particular wanted to go into opposition. Explain that one.
Amirani wrote: » Pharmacoeconomics does this for all medicine. It's not just life years, it's quality life years. It's the only sensible way to deal with the unavoidable scarcity in healthcare and medicine provision.
road_high wrote: » They might be bad but the other vegetables have about as much interest in governing and hard work as you have in ending the lockdown. So we are stuck with them, for a long time
RugbyLad11 wrote: » They have to do something, they can't come out on the 5th May and say there will be 0 changes. They have to give people something to look forward to
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Which will not happen, legally anyway, for a long time to come.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Stating a fact is whining now is it?
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Really? Strange isn`t it that after the GE results that most FG politicians and certainly Leo wanted to go into opposition. Explain that one.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » So you do acknowledge that despite their mistakes they are actually governing the country through this crisis. You are making progress.
lord quackinton wrote: » It’s called bitterness at getting bottoms spanked They gave us abortion and gay marriage and could not believe they lost many seatsBut this crisis they believe is their road to Damascus moment Idiots
Unelected CMO wrote: » Are you familiar with medical privacy rules? Anybody could claim they had anything and there isn’t a Dr. anywhere who’d openly contradict them as it would be a clear breach of those laws. Perfect example- a doctor can sign you off sick without stating a reason and the only recourse for the employer is to request an occupational health assessment. Even in that situation the Occupational Health Doctor can only confirm (in their opinion) whether you are fit to work or not. They can’t tell your employer what you do or don’t have
lord quackinton wrote: » It’s called bitterness at getting bottoms spanked They gave us abortion and gay marriage and could not believe they lost many seats But this crisis they believe is their road to Damascus moment Idiots
prunudo wrote: » And this is what really got to me about Leo's comments yesterday, no talk of a plan, no mention of hope, just threatening the bold children with further restrictions if they didn't behave. I was pleasantly surprised to read some of the comments on this thread as of late between boards, other social media I've felt that I'm surrounded by people who want to see current restrictions contuine for as long as possible. I'll be honest, if they don't relax even the 2km limit on May 5th I'll crack up. All the 'tools' that I used during the financial crash to maintain decent mental health have been taken and I'd fear for my sanity if these current restrictions last much more.
is_that_so wrote: » They are working on a plan and will have to have it before 5 May. He's certainly said this on other occasions.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I am dying to see my family face to face. I am dying to go to the sea which is 5k from my home, there are lots of things I would love to be able to do. But will observe the rules. It is for all our good. Hopefully DIY stores will re open ( with strict in and out and distancing rules), because many want something to do at home, that's ok.Public Transport is off the radar unless for essential travel. Can live with that, but like many used to love the DART trip out to Killiney and walk back up the Vico Road and have a few and a meal in Finnegans in Dalkey. Gone, but hey, it's not essential.I know I'm just talking about myself, but I live in a little quiet enclave of Dublin, and have discovered some really amazing spots over the last few days from Facebook. I am anonymous there and just use it to get info about the locality. Eye opener for me anyway. Never had the time before I suppose.
prunudo wrote: » I hope you're right, just not the impression I got yesterday.
FintanMcluskey wrote: » Stay away from the comment section on the journal.ie the people who post on that need to be rounded up and medically assessed