easypazz wrote: » Problem with increasing limit is people will all pile into some small seaside town or forest park, it will be all over twitter and everybody will throw their toys out of the pram.
Del Boy wrote: » I'd say it could be extended but by June it will have to go altogether. People won't tolerate it long term.
VonLuck wrote: » I know no one here has the answer, but do people think that there will still be a limit on the allowable distance you can travel? I'm hoping they lift the 2km restriction altogether instead of imposing another limit like 10km.
martingriff wrote: » That was me and no I did not suggest just that. I suggested way people may be able to get in contact with other people and have a social life that way. There was a good few other suggestions by me an others. But I suppose since it's not a 1 size fits all we should not try stuff
Unelected CMO wrote: » Source?
LiquidZeb wrote: » Ah no just turn on the PlayStation and it'll be grand. That's what some genius suggested a few pages ago.
Nermal wrote: » https://www.miamiherald.com/news/coronavirus/article242260406.html University of Miami randomised study finds 165,000 Miami-Dade residents with antibodies. 0.14% fatality rate, given reported deaths. Every day, more evidence that our policies were an over-reaction and a failure. That the small number of additional years of life we are saving is not justified by the gargantuan costs. It's hard to get institutions to admit error and change course. So just remember yourself in a year's time, when the excuses flow - an alternative was possible, that serious commentators and experts questioned the panic.
polesheep wrote: » No, no, no. Just stop. There are mentally ill people who want you or anybody else as far away from them as possible. Just don't go there. Thank you.
JoeA3 wrote: » The power is going to Tony’s head. There’s a real school headmaster vibe off him and no one likes being told off by a school teacher. Harris is sitting up at the top of the class with his briefcase. The teacher’s pet. Sooner we start seeing and hearing less of either of them, the better.
wirelessdude01 wrote: » Just read between the lines with primary schools. It is all about glorified baby sitting. Will be dressed up as education and the mental health of the children but really it is about baby sitting. Not sure what the parents think is going to happen in July when they have to look after their children again as there won't be any summer camps this summer to provide child minding for them.
BanditLuke wrote: » Not good for the open it all up warriors on here.https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2020/0425/1134732-holohan-coronavirus-restrictions-compliance/ The good doctor is very careful with his choice of words but i think we all know what he thinks of the people who arent putting their shoulder to the wheel for ireland, a right bunch of asshats who are ruining it for us all.
Cork Boy 53 wrote: » Only if you thoroughly scrub and disinfect the bin cover after using it. Potential of transmission of infection to the refuse collectors is high.
lord quackinton wrote: » what you describe happened every day before this lockdown the courts were full of people not following the law and not seeing a day of jail over it. if you want to be a good sheep then baa away i am a lion, and lions eat sheep all day every day
almostover wrote: » Unfortunately for me I do. An intimate understanding of it.
lord quackinton wrote: » i dont care who believes me i am just telling you a story that might be true or not true. sweet uisce beatha yum yum
lord quackinton wrote: » But we are told they are They barely see their family Maybe less stupid **** like this and they would see their families more
khalessi wrote: » It isays in the article they used their spare time. Unless you want them working 24 hours a day
lord quackinton wrote: » https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.irishmirror.ie/news/irish-news/coronavirus-ireland-heroes-mater-hospital-21858845.amp They can’t be too busy