frillyleaf wrote: » Maybe they don’t think anything will happen to them?
99nsr125 wrote: » Some people resist Because they question Because freedom is something they feel more. We need these people, they protect us from tyranny. Ireland has few actually resisting, look at Australia or Sweden in comparison. That in itself may demonstrate why we remained British subjects for so long.
joe40 wrote: » To compare the current restrictions to tyranny is an insult to the millions of people throughout the world that do actually live under tyranny. They would love your life right now.
standardg60 wrote: » Was I the only one watching the news yesterday of the couple celebrating their anniversary being visited by members of their family thinking Wtf? And RTE thought it was ok to make a feature of it when they've been bleating on and on about non-essential travel? Op if there's one good thing to come out of all this it's that people will be able to see who is actually only ever out for themselves.
Jim_Hodge wrote: » I don't think a son, a daughter and a granddaughter, who live within 2km, leaving gifts at the door and stepping well back while the 92 year olds came no further than their door, is unreasonable when they were celebrating their 65th wedding anniversary. Five neighbours stood at their own garden walls across the road to sing to them. No breach of restrictions there.
pgj2015 wrote: » how dare they go visit their 94 year old relatives and talk to them from 2 metres away:rolleyes: they might have lived only down the road from them btw.
standardg60 wrote: » You must know more about their circumstances than me. Not sure about neighbours standing at garden walls though, I saw a group of people in close proximity applauding. Not to mention several takes by the clearly there camera crew to get things right, plus handling possibly contaminated gifts for the elderly to then handle! In short, I don't see the necessity for these 'good news stories' and 'communications' staff being bundled around the country when there is a lockdown.
lozenges wrote: » Same. People that I would have considered to be intelligent and well educated are suggesting going for walks (live in different household) as long as we stay 2m apart. Neighbours also let their 3 toddlers (from 3 different houses) play together all afternoon on Saturday while chatting to each other on the lawn. Nice people and yeah it must be insanely difficult keeping small kids entertained but it basically puts all the measures they've engaged in so far to waste. Basically I think people will engage in all sorts of mental gymnastics to justify their actions or deliberately misunderstand guidance which is objectively extremely clear.
Jim_Hodge wrote: » Those present were explained in the piece, including who they were and that they lived with 2km. They ere entitled to call to check ln the welfare of their parents even without this major celebration. The gifts were left just as their groceries would have been. The neighbours were certainly off the property and across the street. If you don't ned god news stories, we who are not getting to hug or kiss our only family members certainly appreciate them.
standardg60 wrote: » Seriously? That's exactly what everyone's been told NOT to do!
tdf7187 wrote: » Told by whom? The whole fake crisis is a textbook case of mass propaganda. Literally Orwellian. I'm kind of hoping the virus does cause billions of deaths as the human race has proven itself to be so easily manipulated into obsequious compliance with absurd and entirely disproportionate diktats, all propaganised for by so-called free media, that it doesnt deserve to survive. 5 years ago most of youse were on yer high horses about the perfidy of Putin, ye really are hilarious.
paddythere wrote: » I observe the restrictions entirely apart from the 2km exercise restriction. I have my routes that I always run and I dont see any reason why I should have to stay within 2km of my house when running, in fact I think it would probably be counter-productive to do so.